all 42 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 55 points 1 week ago (8 children)
  • [–] 40 points 1 week ago (7 children)
  • [–] 21 points 1 week ago (6 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago (5 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    All the 90s kids on lemmy having a nostalgic time remembering the irc era.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 89 points 1 week ago (11 children)

    Not using the decentralized part of your decentralized currency is kinda crazy.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    All the hacking risk of keeping your money in a regular bank, but none of the protections that come from reversible transactions and KYC laws.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    KYC laws still apply to all these major brokerages

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Not in the context I'm alluding to. With conventional banking, the only place to move money to is another bank. You can withdraw cash at an ATM, but large transfers have to go to another bank. If someone hacks my bank account and initiates a large transfer, that transaction can be reversed. And moreover, it will be going to an account at another bank that is owned by a known customer.

    But crypto exchanges must have the ability to transfer to unvetted crypto wallets. No crypto customer would accept an exchange that simply didn't let you transfer coins to your own private wallet. So even though the accounts themselves have KYC, you can still hack a crypto account and send the entire balance to an unknown person.

    The equivalent for regular banks would be if your regular bank offered you the option to send a large cash withdrawal to a physical address of your choice. Enter any address, and any amount of your funds can be sent to any address you specify. The closest banks have to that is bill pay, and even that is just a bank to bank transfer in the form of a check in the mail.

    The closest real banks actually get to this is wire transfers, and those are pretty locked down nowadays. They often require going to a physical branch, showing ID, etc in order to initiate a wire transfer. They're locked down precisely because they're the one irreversible transaction built into the regular banking system.

    Crypto bros often fail to realize what actually secures the banking system. The banking system is not secured by foolproof cryptography. The cryptographic security of crypto solves a problem that doesn't exist. Every bank is not the gold standard of IT security. Rather, what really secures the banking system is that there's not much you can actually do with stolen bank login credentials. Pretty much every way you could move money out of said bank account would require you to show your face somewhere or transfer funds to an account traced to your real ID. And pretty much any method of moving money out of a bank account can be reversed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    The cryptographic security of crypto solves a problem that doesn’t exist.

    The point of crypto wasn't to be more secure than money, it was the ability to move it around without having to rely on a third party allowing you to, and charging a large fee for the privilege.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago

    your funds are SNAFU

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    Stealing is wrong, but also... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 week ago (16 children)

    Turns out centralized banking has its benefits

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 week ago (12 children)

    This is a centralized exchange. This attack could be mitigated by encouraging users to move their funds to their own wallets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    But yeah, he's gotta point. Why don't central banks loose money like this? Is it because their cash isn't in a Blockchain?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    Because it's the bank, financial institutions and the trail of transactions registered to known entities who say whose the money is. For crypto you only need the keys and it is yours.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago* (7 children)

    Since crypto is more of a trading asset than currency, they're not that useful in your own wallet because then you constantly need to move them in/out of the exchange and pay all the fees related to those transactions.

    Yeah yeah "actually they're currency" blah blah, except they're not really usable as currency in the functional real world (just like stocks)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Closest by far is Monero. They are actually willing to spend it as a currency, and when looking at statistics from companies that accept different cryptocurrencies, Monero is always either number one or number two on the list.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

    companies that accept different cryptocurrencies

    But this is the issue, that's like 0.0001% of possible places you can use your funds (probably I'm way too generous with that number), and none of it to not die from hunger, cold or dehydration.

    And the volatility is still absolutely absurd for something to be used as currency, like all other Cryptos it is dominated by instability and speculation to an excessive degree.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    I have been buying groceries through giftcards for over 3 years now and i have not died of hunger or dehydration. The cold is admittedly a bit harder. I dont have that one figured out yet.

    But I am able to take my Monero and use it to interact with the brands and companies that everybody else uses.

    What I was saying above is that for companies that accept different types of cryptocurrency directly, Monero is always in the top one or two spot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago*

    I have been buying groceries through giftcards for over 3

    Fair enough, this seems very regionally specific though. I can only buy gift cards for local supermarkets with my credit card for example. And in all the countries I've been to (granted mostly on the European continent) I've never seen an option for using crypto for gift cards.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    they're not that useful in your own wallet because then you constantly need to move them in/out of the exchange and pay all the fees related to those transactions.

    Hot wallets are for small amounts for daily spending

    It's the same as constantly going to the ATM to get cash in your wallet....

    Nobody carries around their whole net worth in their pockets

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    What that statement ment was, that you can't use it to invest and diversify you portfolio if its not in an exchange. So unless you keep the majority in the exchange, you can't trade it without paying the transaction fees every time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

    Seriously (why are you downvoted?). How do you even go about refunds or fraudulent charges in crypto? Are you essentially powerless against scammers and thieves/hackers?

    Apparently private wallets are not safe as those are seemingly hacked most commonly, every virus and crack looks for it. Online exchanges get constantly hacked and online wallets have a tendency to randomly rug pull.

    Entire crypto scene is basically banking but "we got blackjack and hookers so we are better"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment