top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 117 points 1 week ago (6 children)

It may look like gambling, but it's actually fraud.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Like real gambling it’s all fixed by the mob.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    It is gambling attached to a ponzi scheme. It kind of works so long as growth can keep up, but if it ever stops and reverses for any reason...

    Unrelated, how are sea surface temperatures going nowadays?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 week ago (5 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago

    Andrew Beyer’s horse racing book “On Speed” (from the 70/80’s iirc?) showed that a long while ago the basic math for the stock market is very much similar to how paramutual horse / dog betting works.

    it is gambling all the way down.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

    Honestly... Yeah. Outside of insider trading, there's no real way to know what the future holds, so every stock and every bond is just a gamble with varying levels of risk (or Crypto if you like getting rug-pulled over and over)

    Life in of itself is way more about being lucky than most people at the top would like you to think about

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 week ago

    While this has changed, used to be you could look at the financials of a company and determine whether it was a reasonably good long-term investment, so you could pretty consistently build wealth with a diverse array of investments. With algorithmic trading down to the millisecond, much of this has gone out the window

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago

    Yeah, I was going to say something similar. What job you take, where you decide to live, friends you make all have a risk/reward element to them.

    That being said I do believe there is a big difference between polymarket/prediction markets and stocks (or at least some stocks). Prediction markets is either betting on pure chance or against insider knowledge. Technically stocks should be seen as investing in a company (especially ones that pay dividends). Could a company run into hard times and lose you money, sure, but there is at least a bit more freely available information on that available to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    And be very wary regarding any person telling you something is "Economics 101" - they are full of shit.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJrhBwGw7Ac

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago*

    Jokes on you, I put all my savings in USD in 2000 and I'm only down 50%. I just gotta keep putting more in, I'll win eventually.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago

    We need a Stakeholder economy, not a Shareholder economy!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    It's not gambling for the people that the state will bail out.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    It's not gambling for the House, because the odds are already stacked in your favor.

    It's not gambling for the state, because this is guaranteed tax revenue and campaign contributions, off the backs of people who are more than willing to feed the beast.

    It's not gambling for the players, either. In the end, they always go to zero.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago

    Life is one big slot machine

    A rigged one

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago* (15 children)

    Speaking of which, I've always been curious to try "investing in stocks", but have no idea how. Does anyone have tips on starting?

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    I keep writing and deleting this same post a lot, because there're so many facets to it, but I swear it's not really that complicated once you understand how much of it is about tax efficiency. It turns out that answering the question you asked is the best place to start: "tips on starting."

    Tips:

    • Pick a brokerage that isn't Robinhood. Fidelity, Charles Schwab, and Vanguard are big names with zero trading fees; Schwab probably has the best user interface since they got ThinkOrSwim when they bought TD Ameritrade.
    • Get comfortable with the idea that you'll want to do direct bank ACH transfers to your accounts with the brokerage. You should at least have a normal brokerage account that doesn't have tax advantages or rules, and a Roth IRA.
    • Learn about Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). You can buy shares of $VOO (if I use a dollar sign it means it's a stock "ticker symbol") and get a slice of the entire S&P 500. A share of $VT buys a slice of (one of Vanguard's interpretations of) the entire world market. You can be diversified with just one fund.
    • Find good websites to research. Bogleheads is a good one that I like. $RDDT had several subreddits that looked at the topic from all different aspects, but now that's just another thing they've stolen from the world.^1^
    • Ask questions if you have them and find good websites to research. Most of the buy-it-and-hold crowd's advice won't have changed at all across decades (that strategy is where you buy the stock, and then hold it), but search engines tend to push newer websites, and it's kind of pointless to set up a new website that just always says to buy and hold.



    Some links:



    [1] Since we know they do marketing campaigns that will push certain topics/movies/whatever if they're paid to, AND we know they have carte blanche with shadow bans/hiding posts/etc, has anyone done any analysis to see if they're being paid to push certain stocks in whatever tattered remains are left over from their investing forums? I guess you'd have to pay them for access to scan their comments now with any kind of speed, and I'll also guess you wouldn't be able to buy a product from them that would prove they're doing it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)
  • Margin is a short term loan from your broker that requires interest payments. As noted in the boglehead article, usually this requires borrowing against your portfolio (or if you're using Robinhood, you flip the switch that allows margin and borrow against a software bug). The brokerages have high speed computers programmed with people who like money to make sure anything risky you do on margin doesn't come back on them, and they can/will sell shares out of your portfolio to balance their risk.

    If you want more exposure than you have cash, there are funds like $NTSX that use witchcraft to effectively capture 90% of the 500 largest stocks in the US (saying S&P 500 is trademarked or something) and 60% of the bond market, for a total of 150%. I don't know much more about it except to say that if the fund goes to zero, which everything could, your exposure is limited to the money you put into it.

    Note that none of this is investment advice, and any cash you stick in a mattress loses purchasing power to inflation.

    Sources:

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago
    1. Don't seek advice on a meme forum
    2. Use common sense, a company that has had profits for the last 5 years is probably a good investment.
    3. Seek information online, with the biggest grain of salt imagineable. If an investment bro or comment online seem manic or urgent, it is a bad investment. Those are the people you are suppose to be profiting from.
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

    This is the best, most consistent strategy for the past 50+ years:

    Step 1: Open an account. If you have a 401k, you already have a retirement account, probably with Fidelity. If you don't have a 401k, Fidelity is still a fine choice. You could also choose Schwab or Vanguard. Don't overthink it, though, because it doesn't really matter.

    Step 2: Put everything into $VOO.* Every time you get a paycheck, put some of it into your account and buy more $VOO.

    Step 3: Don't touch it. Don't. I know you want to. I know you want to look at that number. Don't. Don't do it. I know you heard about trading options somewhere and you saw the posts of people who turned $10k into $10 million. That's not going to happen. Don't touch the money. Leave it alone.

    Step 4: When you have enough money to live comfortably for the rest of your life, start selling it to buy bonds.

    *Everything else you do might get more money, but it is worse on average. For example, you might be feeling smart, and decide that all these big tech stocks are overvalued. So you'll buy $RWL instead. That might get more money, but it probably won't. If you insist on doing something fancy, at least put most of your money in $VOO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Put everything into $VOO.* Every time you get a paycheck, put some of it into your account and buy more $VOO.

    VGT has been beating VOO for almost it's entire existence. Higher volitility, but better long term results.

    Everything else you do might get more money, but it is worse on average

    That's a real YMMV situation. If you want an easy way to guarantee around 10% ROI on your savings every year, no thinking required, VOO is great (VGT is marginally better, but not an enormous difference).

    If you get into the weeds, actually learn what you're investing in, find equities that are undervalued, and stay well diversified, you can do better than the market more often than not.

    The big caveat is most people don't know how to value equities. It's difficult, complicated, it can carry a lot of risk, and it can be very stressful.

    The other caveat is, you won't do that much better. So if you aren't working an eight figure+ fund, the difference between 10% ROI and 11% ROI won't be worth the leg work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    If [things], you can do better than the market more often than not.

    This is not true for 90+% of people who attempt it.

    If you were born with an extra luck-bone, go for it. If not, $VOO and turning your brain off is a superior strategy.

    ...VGT...

    I said 50+ years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (5 children)

    Roth IRA. put 10% in each paycheck.

    If you're instead looking to trade stocks like Pokemon cards, there are plenty of apps that let you do that. And just like Pokemon cards, you'll put more in than you'll ever take out if you trade like that.

    Buy the dip, hold. You'll either eventually come out ahead or the company you bought will dissolve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    As long as he isn't turning them over in trades, or overweighting his purchases, he can pick stocks like Pokémon cards and do fine. Plenty of buy and hold investors beat the indexes and the ones that don't usually aren't that far behind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    Buy the dip, hold.

    Timing the market is always a bad idea. You're routinely better off fully invested than with cash on the side waiting for the dip.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 1 week ago*

    Star fox tried to warn us!

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago* (8 children)

    (VTV+VXUS+BNDW)×(Roth) the most boring winning strategy. Get modestly rich slowly through consistently disciplined and simple contributions. It's your best bet for beating the house (because you're in the house, or at least its mudroom).

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    What happens when the AI companies get into the indexes? Big tech is already heavily represented and the AI bubble popping will probably destroy sensible index fund portfolios.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    Probably bad things, which is why I feel (marginally) safer in VTV, Vanguard's large cap value fund, focused on consumer staples, insurance companies, holding companies like Berkshire, defense contractors...basically large companies with the lowest P/E and P/B ratios. I'm not saying it won't hurt when the bubble collapses, but it intentionally excludes the FAANG and overpriced tech.

    It ain't perfect by any stretch, but it at least tries to capture profitable and (relatively) underpriced companies with proven records instead of market darlings.

    VXUS for exposure to foreign markets. BNDW for the ginormous market of bonds.

    The crash will hurt. It'll be a good buying opportunity for anyone with cash. I have a few more decades to weather the storm, so I'm just staying steady. I've already tried my hand at picking stocks (gambling) and learned the hard way (because I ignored the books telling me what not to do) that I suck at gambling. Technically, any normal person is supposed to suck at gambling, otherwise it wouldn't survive as a venture.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    That serms like a sound plan. It’s all gonna be terrible, but that should at least be a hedge against the insanity in big tech. I suspect that defense will have a slow decline as our former allies contine to back away from our unreliable dumb asses, but it won’t have the spectacular crash out like AI related stocks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    I'm having trouble looking up all those acronyms. I know about roth 401ks, but not the other stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    I wouldn't say that common stock trading is gambling, but futures and options trading definitely is.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    As a futures trader, I can confirm that trading futures is gambling. Like poker, if you know what you're doing, you can make a living. Most people can't make a living playing poker, and 95% of traders are not profitable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    it's educated gambling where the house has significantly less of an edge (or at least appears to)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    gambling has negative expected value, the house always wins in the long run.

    the stock market has pretty much always trended up over time so if you just buy a bunch of stuff and wait a while you will pretty much always win. (you can still gamble with stocks, it's just that stocks are fundamentally different and you can also not gamble)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    I was watching the World Series last night and made a comment in a chat about how ads and companies these days in the US are just one grift after another. Seriously, the ads were:

    • AI (multiple companies)
    • Medications that are borderline poison but somehow get approved anyway
    • Kalshi and other betting platforms

    The US creates problems for its citizens and then finds ways to sell them the cure. All of this has accelerated over the years and it’s just going to get worse.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Spouse was just watching something on some free streaming app and all the ads are ai generated and scams aimed at old people. This one was about some fake life insurance claims when it flashes a 1-2 second picture of this at the end where it tells you if you call they will add your information to their databases and sell it and you choose to void your rights and take yourself off the national do not call list..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago*

    My mom got hit with this kind of shit. It’s the reason she ended up with 10 car warranties. I overheard her answer the phone one day while I was at her house and it was the parasite warranty company again. I ripped that motherfucker a new one. Made him tell me exactly how many warranties he can see that she had prior, made him cancel them all while I was on the phone, all with the threat of legal recourse. After all of that, I told him to get a real job and to stop fucking over the elderly.

    A country that allows this, knows exactly what it’s doing. Just like the US government knew what it was doing when it repealed gambling regulations in 2018.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    Prospecting is gambling

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago

    Absolutely not a stunning revelation. Stock brokers and others in the industry have always used betting terminology pretty openly.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Y'all's in America got no Fintech regulation?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago*

    Basically regular people are doing real shit like growing corn and mining and fixing computers and all that, and then you've got this like teeming mat of busy busy parasites that lays over everyone and figured out they could generate money by playing games loaning, withholding, or just guessing what the regular people will do. Then you've got another layer of parasites over that one who do the same thing but just with the lower parasites, and they're even more useless and richer than any of the others combined.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (8 children)

    Agriculture is gambling.

    It’s also the origin of interest.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    No, because you still have to do work and make a product when farming. The same can’t be said for gambling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (4 children)

    gambling

    the activity of risking money on the result of something, such as a game or horse race, hoping to make money

    Agriculture fits: you put in resources and hope that weather/pests/etc. will leave enough for you to survive

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    Agriculture is a low risk bet that is that reduces variability and isn't all or nothing. Gambling is a high risk/reward zero-sum game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Reducing variability is just how we are doing it now, not what it is. And I can just as well not bet all my money in one go. Besides, seen recent (last decade) news on climate changes? Doesn't look like low risk for agriculture to me

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago* (6 children)

    I love shitting on the markets as much as the next person, but saying the Nasdaq is like polymarket is deliberately flippant.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    Bet365? Gambling?!

    Never

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Put gatcha and all them mobile games alike and yeah.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    Hey kids! We heard you like video games! How would you like to foster a gambling addiction while playing them?

    We'll make them free-to-play and help you develop these lifelong habits in your youth! Yay!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    The joke might be on the dude with the gun since gunpowder needs oxygen no?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

    Yes, in the manufacturing of the cartridge, but once it's made, it doesn't need an atmosphere containing oxygen to activate. The explosive charge behind the projectile is ready to go and just waiting for prime time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Ah good info! Then there might still be the challenge of recoil?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

    Newton's third law dictates there must be recoil. The momentum of the projectile and gasses exiting the end of the barrel must be exactly balanced by the force of holder's hand multiplied by the time it takes to arrest all motion of the recoiling firearm.

    Momentum = definite integral of force as a function of time multiplied by the duration of time where momentum and force are both specific to an equivalent directional vector.

    Could also use an energy analysis. The total kinetic energy of the projectile and exiting gasses will equal the handheld force multiplied by the distance the gun moves backward - more movement backward, less average force...in the limiting case of minimal movement backward, the force will be extremely high and short-lived.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    The New York Stock Exchange was founded by basically selling shares of itself alongside wheat and tobacco and betting on the fact that it'd be something someday.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    insemination is the biggest slot machine

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Sports betting = Yob gambling

    Stock markets = wanker gambling

    So come on now, whatareya?

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Equating actual regulated equity markets with gambling apps is literally just gambling industry propaganda.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    Using Overwatch crates, when it was Valve's TF2 that started off the whole thing...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment