post
You'll never guess which political article people will repost for weeks!
Ho hum... the white liberals are trying to distance themselves from their (more honest) fascist cousins again - this time using "sCiEnCe!"
You sound desperately confused.
Or maybe just desperate
As confused as a liberal that refuses to understand why the pretend-democratic blow-up dolls they keep voting into power never raises a finger against fascism?
That confused, lib?
You mean the libs pushing progressive candidates who are polling better than Republicans in the midterms?
You seem to be assuming that every liberal is a neo-liberal. That's an incorrect assumption.
You mean the libs pushing progressive candidates
Which (so-called) "progressives" are you talking about? Those pretend-left edgy liberals who co-opt and deradicalise leftist thought in order to protect the liberal socio-economic status quo from working-class dissent? The ones who go "No we shouldn't" straight after promising "Yes we can," perhaps?
Are those the ones you are referring to?
You seem to be assuming that every liberal is a neo-liberal.
Were you under the impression that liberalism's core tenet - the private ownership over the means of production and almost everything else by a capitalist elite - only stems from the 70s and 80s?
No, Clyde - that is what liberalism has always been about since the very start.
The only thing that differentiates neolibs from other kinds of liberals is that they are perfectly candid about it.
[✓] conditioned to accept arguments on faith
[✓] conditioned to submit to authority
[✓] conditioned to reject evidence and learning that contradicts faith
[✓] conditioned to think the past was better and evil is rising
Passes the common sense check.
(which, reminder, means you should be suspicious of it and the sources. Internet loves to tell you what you want to hear (and what enrages you). Check the source; read the argument; see if you'd find it convincing for a different conclusion.)
“Faith” can be any kind of belief system. I know an older man who thought they could make money off the stock market by watching stock prices and by listening to analysts. They’re naive about how things function.
Connected to that is an inability to learn/how to teach themselves by using critical thinking and so heavily rely on other people to spoon feed them information.
Lastly, it’s an identity threat for them when reality doesn’t match their beliefs. So they dig their heels deeper.
The four checkmarks of US school education.
You'll never believe it, but I guessed it!!
Turns out »facts don’t care about your feelings« gets awkward when the facts start measuring vocabulary. Still, correlation isn’t destiny, and this study is about Christian nationalism, not every conservative or Christian. The headline is doing a lot more ideological cardio than the paper.
I'm fascinated about the vocabulary of that article, aimed at keeping the focus group from understanding it.
“People with higher intelligence are more likely to have a general understanding of the constitution”
The ideology that offers easy (poor) answers to complex problems?
The ideology that tells them they're the good guys by fiat so long is they obey the leaders that tell them they're special?
IQ: bullshit
Low cognitive ability: not bullshit, evidently. BTW, this was determined entirely by a 10-question, multiple choice vocabulary quiz.
Someone doesn’t know how science is actually done. It’s a series of surveys over 35 years using sample sizes between 1,500 people and 18,693 individuals, from the limited methodology publications I read through in the last 15 minutes. That’s far more than is required to be considered trustworthy, reliable, and accurate as long as their other methods were sound, which they appear to be.
The study uses binary and ordinal logistic regression models that appear to be highly reliable with large sample sizes, and their accuracy appear reliable based on the study meeting standard core statistical assumptions and they seem to avoid rare-outcome traps.
This is a sound study, and you should probably look into statistical modeling in producing such studies before using language you’ve likely read in comments sections that like to dismiss studies because they don’t like the results or findings for political or personal reasons.
Their methodology:
Your word salad didn't explain how a 10-question vocabulary quiz is not problematic for assessing intelligence but an IQ test is.
You'll notice that I didn't take umbrage with the sample size.
Maybe discussing science papers isn’t for you, if you can’t understand basic methodology language and practices.
"smart people don't like me" "I love the poorly educated"
This post is just ONE MORE piece of evidence that shows you are stupid if you vote conservative and arent a member of the 1%.
You morons failed the intelligence test the first time you voted Republican. Ever since Jan 6th, we have watched you and your party CONSTANTLY fail moral tests to reach a point where you guys defend treason and pedophilia now.
So, not only do we have proof that you are stupid. We also know that you are cruel and love to watch those who don't look like you suffer.
You are all despicable and destroyed the country
They've broken the social contract, no succor of its protections for them anymore. End up destitute and homeless? Good, stay that way for the rest of your life. Maybe then conservatives will realize what hell this country is after it affects them directly.
Is chunes@lemmy.world a Republican?
Sounds like someone texted poorly on their cognitive tests
Wait, only 10 questions? Doesn’t sound very reliable to me.
.....
you did see tgr comment 2h before you posted yours about how it actually works? respinding to the same person you responded too.....
Checks out because I have low cognitive ability
I'm going to guess that they're partisan ideologues of the red and blue variety. They both are just so very fond of their thought-terminating cliches', so it makes sense.
Uh, let me guess. Red hats? Big trucks that aren't used for hauling? Number one sport is cow tipping?
Using data from spanning from 1989 to 2024, the researcher cross-referenced scores on a cognitive vocabulary exercise with responses to questions about how important it is to be a Christian to be “truly American.”
There are many peoples who I could consider to be ‘truly American’ but I don’t think any of them were Cristian….
it suggests Christian nationalism (like religious fundamentalism or right-wing authoritarianism) is not the result of more sophisticated and complex ruminations on politics, religious ethics, and pluralism,”
Lmao. lol. ROFL even.
Everything with them is projection, and they claim liberalism / progressivism is a mental illness.
If the people of Oklahoma could read, they'd be really angry at their university right now
I learned a new term today, "European-style Christianity".
The study, published in the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, looked at cognitive factors while stripping out variables like demographics and education. It found that in the US, those who subscribe to the doctrine of Christian nationalism — characterized as a belief in strict social order, blurring of religion with a sense of civic belonging, and promotion of European-style Christianity — tend to correspond to a low level of cognitive ability.

all 16 comments