all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 141 points 1 week ago (7 children)

“Where are the engineers” to manage this on prem hardware?

Well, you laid them off, you fuck.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    They’re going to use AI to install the AI.

    Recursive Self Installation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

    IBMs a bit weird. They fired a shitload of them a while back.

    Then they said they're only replacing junior roles.

    Then I think they're hiring a lot more juniors because they need to build the next seniors.

    I didn't really follow too closely but that last statement is at least something I can respect.

    [edit] I think mushroommunk is absolutely on point [/edit]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 1 week ago

    It's not really something you should respect. It's PR shell games. They fired senior staff to replace them with cheaper juniors. Not because they actually think they're training the future but because they think they can get the same work out of them+AI

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    Of course IBM has a hardware solution for you

    Krishna also predicted demand for on-prem AI will spur sales of Big Blue’s Spyre mainframe accelerator cards.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 week ago* (3 children)

    Yep. This is why Nvidia is preaching open weights literally every chance they get, too.

    Still. It’s a better stance, even if for selfish reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Guy selling fruit says fruit is juicy more breaking news at 11

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 week ago

    I mean, obviously, but I guess the only reason they're saying this is because their own models aren't that great (IBM granite sucks) and this way they can still sell consulting services.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago

    Whose premises? Release the GPUs and make them cheap again you motherfuckers

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

    Maybe I'm just sleep deprived, cynical, or thinking too deep into it, but I don't even like how they are using the words "on-prem" throughout the article instead of simply saying they're running local LLMs. Seems like such a weird choice of wording that is meant to subtly steer less informed people away from looking into alternatives to the subscription based LLM services, as most casual people wont associate it as the same thing and ignore it and move on. Even if that's the correct terminology for that specific field, I feel like most people would just naturally say "Yes, we are running the LLM servers locally here" as that's the only way I've ever heard people say it even online.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    For a company "on-prem" might not mean the same as "local". You might run them in your company data center or in a colocated server (rented space in a data center). In either of those cases, the data center might be physically close to you, but it could be on a different continent.

    "On-prem" implies that the company has physical access/control of the server.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 week ago

    "On-premises" as it refers to enterprise hw/sw, has been a phrase much longer than "local LLM"

    Even though everyone moved to cloud, most companies keep some portion of their infrastructure on-prem, like prod env in the cloud and on-prem test env/backups, or vice versa

    Maybe most consumers wouldn't recognize the phrase, but industry professionals certainly would

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

    BTW, IBM/RHEL is hoping you might go for some red hat, IBM solutions for local distributed AI stuff :

    But you know, the CEO isn't biased. /s

    At least they're working on letting you have access to the open source (ish) local way of working with AIs instead of just the subscription model that the others are pushing.

    I did some digging into this before giving the fuck up since my computer is a potato, and I have too many fucking things to do with my time.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    If I could pick a company that has fucked up more than Microsoft or EA, it would be IBM. For the past 20 years, the whole company has been on a wild bender of buying good products, and shoving them headfirst into the ground.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    For all their faults, IBM has treated Red Hat and Hashicorp better than Broadcom has treated VMware.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    I read your article and still think my statement stands. In fact, your article shows that the behavior the author didn't like from Red Hat existed long before the IBM acquisition. If you see the Red Hat treatment of its paying customers equal to what Broadcom is doing to its VMware customers, then I don't believe you have a good grasp of the Broadcoms current behavior.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    It was always the future no big tech wanted.... That's why they enbeded models everywhere.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 19 points 1 week ago

    Man who has a vested interest in selling sever hardware: "You can buy a server and host things on-prem"

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago

    Pure big AI (OpenAI, Anthropic) companies are so cooked, small models are coming to eat their lunch. Meta, Google et.al. have other arrows in their quiver. Even IBM are likely too big, Qwen 3.8 27B is a beast you can host on a gaming rig and suitable for many, many use cases.

  • source