Fireworks go off in the background with a sign that is blue that says conservative and a man stands on the stage with his arms out wearing a black suit

For the first time in nearly a century, B.C. has a Conservative government.

Lorne Doerkson’s BC Conservatives won a majority government, defeating David Eby’s incumbent NDP. It’s a stunning win for the Conservatives after a chaotic couple of months, culminating in Eby’s decision to call a snap election almost two years ahead of schedule.

Doerkson, a low-profile MLA first elected in Cariboo—Chilcotin in 2020, became the party’s interim leader one day before the snap election was called.

On the campaign trail, Doerkson presented himself as a mild-mannered former rodeo rider and grandfather, promising to bolster B.C.’s economy while cutting taxes, reducing regulations and courting investment. The Conservative campaign platform mentions climate just once, stating “climate decisions” should be based on three principles: protecting people from extreme weather, reducing emissions in B.C. and beyond and delivering measurable results.

In the end, a majority of voters threw their support behind the Conservatives, handing the former opposition party the reins of the province for the next four years.

“Together, we seized this opportunity, you guys, and together we voted for a better British Columbia,” Doerkson told an electric crowd in Vancouver. During his victory speech he promised to “supercharge” the province and “cut red tape like it’s never been cut before.”

A man in a blue big rig truck looks at the camera while a line of people stand below him.

Lorne Doerkson was first elected under the BC Liberal banner in 2020. One day before the snap election was called, he became the BC Conservatives’ interim leader. Photo: Lorne Doerkson / X

Despite choosing to call an election while the Conservatives were in chaos, the BC NDP will now form the official opposition. Eby held on to his Vancouver—Point Grey seat but in his concession speech offered his resignation as party leader.

The BC Greens maintained their seat count with party leader Emily Lowan winning the Saanich North and the Islands riding where she was seeking a seat in the legislature. Incumbent Green MLA Jeremy Valeriote was re-elected in West Vancouver—Sea to Sky.

Here’s a breakdown of some of the promises Doerkson and the Conservatives made on the campaign trail.

The end of DRIPA and a new approach to Indigenous Rights

One of Doerkson’s first public statements after becoming interim leader of the BC Conservatives was to declare his intention to repeal B.C.’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA.

The pledge, which is a top priority for the Conservatives, appears in the party’s platform under a section titled “protect private property rights” — despite the fact that the act doesn’t deal with private property.

During the campaign, Doerkson was vague about what his government’s next steps would be after repealing the act. Ditching the law will not eliminate the B.C. government’s consultation obligations with First Nations or eliminate friction related to Indigenous Rights and Aboriginal Title. Even in a post-DRIPA province, the constitutionally guaranteed rights of First Nations can be hashed out in the courts, as they have been for decades.

“Simply just repealing it isn’t going to do anyone any service,” Dallas Smith, president of the Nanwakolas Council, told The Narwhal in an interview during the early days of the election campaign.

The Conservative platform promised to pass a law requiring information about Aboriginal Title claims and ongoing negotiations to be made public. The proposed law would also publicize information about legal actions and agreements related to First Nations Rights and Title.

The party’s platform also promises to “restore equal access to Crown land and provincial parks,” a pledge that appears to target annual temporary closures of Pipi7íyekw/Joffre Lakes Park, which restrict visits to members of Líl̓wat and N’Quatqua First Nations, whose unceded territories encompass the park. These reconnection periods have been taking place since 2023 and are intended to allow the nations to conduct traditional harvesting, as well as ceremonial and cultural practices.

Under a BC Conservative government, reconciliation with First Nations will focus on “practical co-operation, clear and fair treaty agreements and economic opportunities,” the platform says. It emphasizes opportunities for First Nations to benefit from projects through revenue sharing and ownership opportunities.

LNG, fracking and fossil fuels

The Conservatives have promised to make B.C. an “energy superpower” by doubling liquefied natural gas (LNG) production by 2032 and tripling it by 2035. With LNG Canada the only LNG export facility currently operating in B.C., the province is already on track to more than triple the province’s LNG production by 2035 with five additional LNG projects currently in development.

On the campaign trail, Doerkson lamented the number of LNG projects proposed under the BC Liberal government of the 2000s and 2010s and said his party is keen to see if any can be revived.

The Conservative energy platform also pledges to get rid of B.C.’s industrial carbon tax and replace it with new rules that it says would ensure B.C.’s gas exports are competitive with the United States and Qatar.

An orangey brown river and road lead into an industrial plant

The BC Conservatives plan to double liquefied natural gas (LNG) production by 2032, then triple it just three years later. Photo: Marty Clemens / The Narwhal

A BC Conservative government would take a new approach to tallying B.C.’s greenhouse gas emissions, one that runs counter to the 2016 Paris Agreement. The Conservative platform proposes taking credit for “emissions avoided through cleaner B.C. exports,” using the example of exported gas replacing coal.

Doerkson has also promised to use deregulation as a tool to spur economic development, partly by bringing back a ministry dedicated to getting rid of rules, processes and laws it deems burdensome or unnecessary. For every new regulation a Conservative government makes, it would axe two existing regulations, according to Doerkson.

Energy, electrification and renewables

Beyond boosting natural gas and LNG production, the BC Conservatives are promising to boost B.C.’s energy self-sufficiency, a commitment that would mean building a considerable amount of additional energy generation capacity. The province currently balances its energy needs through a mix of energy imported from other jurisdictions (mostly Alberta and western U.S. states) and locally generated power.The strategy, basically, is to use local sources when they are cheap and convenient and buy imported power — such as solar-generated power from California — when it is plentiful and cheap. To date, the strategy has worked out well, though recent drought conditions have put a squeeze on those margins.

The Conservatives are committed to boosting B.C.’s energy production “from every available source,” according to its platform.

Two bald eagles sit on a power line.

The Conservatives are promising to bolster B.C.’s energy self-sufficiency “from every available source,” moving away from the current strategy that includes buying imported power from Alberta and the United States. Photo: Katherine Cheng / The Narwhal

Boosting biomass production is a key part of the Conservatives’ energy pitch. The party is proposing to increase the use of logging and mill waste to make renewable fuels. On renewables, the Conservatives support wind, solar and small-scale hydro power “where economics and reliability make sense,” as well as geothermal projects where a business case can be made — i.e. with little investment from the provincial government.

Notably, the 2026 B.C. Conservative platform did not mention nuclear power, an energy source the party touted as part of the solution to B.C.’s energy crunch during the 2024 election.

Beyond increasing exports, a Conservative government would consider opening the door to more natural gas power production in B.C. by making it eligible for BC Hydro’s call for energy project proposals.

The Conservatives are also promising to “restore choice in energy for home heating and cooking” — a commitment to attacking restrictions and bans on natural gas use implemented by local governments — and overhaul B.C.’s Energy Step Code, which sets energy efficiency standards for new buildings.

Logging and old-growth forest conservation

On the campaign trail, the BC Conservatives promised to do many of the same things the NDP government did to bolster the province’s floundering forestry industry — secure support from the federal government to offset the impact of U.S. tariffs on softwood lumber, boost policies aimed at getting more woodfibre to mills and provide cash for mills to upgrade their operations.The Conservatives’ forestry platform promised to make more trees available for harvest — but does not address how the party would ensure companies actually harvest the maximum amount allowed, something that has not happened in years due largely to the dwindling availability of economically viable trees to log. The Conservatives are also promising to focus on streamlining permitting, reduce costs for forestry companies and support value-added manufacturing.

an old-growth forest on Haida Gwaii

Though the BC Conservatives’ promises regarding forestry are largely the same as the NDP’s, they have not addressed how the party would ensure companies can actually harvest the maximum amount allowed, with dwindling availability of economically viable trees to log. Photo: Josiah Fennell / The Narwhal

Conservative forestry policies would double government revenue from stumpage fees by 2028-29, according to the campaign platform. The 2026 provincial budget did not include a specific revenue estimate for stumpage but estimated total forestry-related revenues will increase 3.3 per cent per year through 2029.

The BC Conservative platform claims conservation is a conservative value but doesn’t offer many specific conservation-focused commitments. The party pledges to increase enforcement in parks and wilderness areas with more conservation officers in the field, and to establish sustainable fish and wildlife population objectives.

The platform promises a science-based approach to wildlife management with input from hunters, anglers and First Nations. It also repeats a 2024 campaign commitment to develop a made-in-B.C. species-at-risk law. The Conservative platform doesn’t mention B.C.’s existing commitment to protect 30 per cent of lands and waters by 2030, known as 30-by-30. In May 2024, former BC Conservative leader John Rustad told The Narwhal he would abandon the goal.

What now?

When the B.C. legislature began its summer break at the end of May, the BC NDP held 47 seats, the BC Conservatives held 39, and the BC Greens held two. There were five independent MLAs, all of them formerly members of the BC Conservative caucus.

The BC Conservatives had just elected a new leader, Kerry-Lynne Findlay, a former Conservative Party of Canada MP and cabinet minister. Findlay won the leadership race to replace John Rustad, who resigned as the party’s leader in December 2025 after weeks of caucus infighting. Findlay’s victory was narrow; she won 51 per cent of party members’ votes, barely beating out second-place finisher Caroline Elliott. Elliott is set to head to the legislature after winning the West Vancouver—Capilano riding for the BC Conservatives.

A view of the front lawn of the BC legislature with a large Canadian Flag hanging above the front steps

“I think David Eby is going to regret this,” Lorne Doerkson said at a Vancouver press conference following the snap election call. “Because this election actually offers an opportunity for hope and for real change.” Photo: Province of British Columbia / Flickr

The BC Conservatives had a spectacularly chaotic summer. Findlay’s leadership lasted just 113 days, ending in her resignation on Sept. 20. Before she stepped down, 13 MLAs had left or been removed from the BC Conservative caucus and one more — Abbotsford—Mission MLA Reann Gasper — stepped down to allow Findlay to secure a set in a by-election.

Doerkson was appointed the party’s interim leader the day after Findlay stepped down.

After Eby’s snap election call, the by-election was cancelled, Findlay exited the party and 10 of the 13 MLAs who had left the caucus signed up to run again.

“I think David Eby is going to regret this,” Doerkson said at a Vancouver press conference following the snap election call. “Because this election actually offers an opportunity for hope and for real change.”

He was right. The Conservatives won a historic victory, though Doerkson’s future as premier is uncertain. His party’s constitution bars interim leaders from running to become a permanent leader, though the constitution can be changed. Tweaking the rules to allow Doerkson to remain premier will require the support of two-thirds of party members at an annual general or special general meeting. The Conservative Party’s board of directors committed to “pursue the appropriate means” to keep Doerkson as party leader in the event of an election win.

The Narwhal’s reporters are telling environment stories you won’t read about anywhere else. Stay in the loop by signing up for our free weekly dose of independent journalism.


From The Narwhal | News on Climate Change, Environmental Issues in Canada via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
31 comments in c/britishcolumbia@lemmy.ca view that post
[–] 41 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

One of Doerkson’s first public statements after becoming interim leader of the BC Conservatives was to declare his intention to repeal B.C.’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, or DRIPA.

So white supremacy and land greed are their driving principles then.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    Every time I see this guys name, I just see Dork-son.

    I know names are a low blow, but why does it seem so many conservative candidates just have the names that likely got made fun of in school?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Hope you guys like data centres in poor towns.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (2 children)

    Why couldn’t more people switch from ndp to grn instead of con, what fumble on disillusioned voters.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    If you look at the actual voter turnout, it doesn't look so much like people switched as it looks like NDP voters just stayed home. Conservatives got something like 40k fewer votes than last election and the NDP got something like 270k fewer votes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago

    What an embarrassment.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    What horrible news. My wife and I were planning to flee to BC from the states if November went poorly. Currently live west coast.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    This likely shouldn't change your plans. The Conservatives here are not great, but they aren't nearly as bad as republicans most of the time.

    It will also likely only be 4 years. They are likely to shit the bed and get voted out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    The one saving grace is that the BCCons spent two years fighting over each other that they haven't sat down and made (or had written for them by wealthy interests) an evil policy document like Project 2025, which had we seen this result in 2028 they'd have more time to prepare. We can still protest and push back against many of their developing ideas for governance.

    I am bracing for destructive policies but we're going to have to move forward and do what we can to limit the worst damage.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    This is so sad. The old growth forests in the PNW are some of the most efficient carbon capturing forests on earth. Combined with Brazil going to a far right government and it's looking bleak as hell. I think these are the final nails in the coffin of our species.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Conservatives are an existential threat to all life on earth. There has never been a peaceful solution to an infestation of conservatism. It must be dealt with harshly.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Except when it's conservatives from "minority communities". NDP, Greens and Liberals treat them like royalty and the sole, rightful representatives of all "minorities".

    Remember that time when Left decided everyone in the country should be forced to hear Adhan so everyone knows when it's time to pray to One True God?

    Or that time when they decided which religious headgear is a valid replacement for motorcycle helmets in various provinces?

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -9 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

    liberalism has become too extreme and solved too few problems, not that conservatism is better

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    This is the most terminally-online, red-pilled take I see far too often. You are conflating online opinions with reality. There are absolutely people online that want to tear down capitalism, entirely move to renewable energy, and whatever other 'evils' you can think of. But if you look at what the elected parties employ, it's the most white bread bland shit ever. There are almost no meaningfully progressive policies getting through and if they do it is watered down to the point that it obviously won't do anything anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    OK good luck affording a home

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    Anti-progressive policies are why housing is an investment instead of a right. If true progressives were voted into power then landlords would be taxed out of existence and housing would be affordable for everyone again.

    Instead centralists want to make it easier for people to get on the "ladder" and then continue to let the prices frow infinitely, kickin the can down the road until someone realizes basic community functions can't escalate in price infinitely without doing more harm. Conservatives want something even worse, they want to protect commercial investors such that rent grows higher every year and renters have less rights.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    true progressives

    What's Olivia Chow? Chopped liver?

    If Jagmeet wasn't a true progressive, why did NDP keep doubling down instead of kicking him out?

    Do you know who destroyed the Ontario liberal party? A true progressive, psychotic ideologue.

    Leftists' appeal to purity and ever shifting goalposts aren't palatable anymore.

    You know what else causes harm? Flooding the country with more people from elsewhere when the citizens can't afford housing and food after paying exuberant taxes all their lives.

    I think "progressives" have caused enough harm already. The majority of this country does not want your "utopia".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    The reality is progressive policies lead to better societal outcomes, one of which is housing being more efficient (either cheaper for the same quality, or higher quality for the same price).

    So if your politicians haven't enacted policies to accomplish those things then they aren't progressives no matter what they say or what the media is telling you. Immigrants are not the reason Canada has the issues it has. Everywhere in the world is claiming that same issue, it's just not accurate. If governments wanted to solve the housing issue they could and swiftly.

    I know Canada hasn't banned landlords and I have no doubt they're more interested in protecting the investments of the wealthy than they are interested in delivering better life outcomes for it's people. So they by definition the people in charge can't be progressives. This isn't a purity test it's a fundamental definition check. Maybe they're progressives in terms of social rights but that's only one of the government's role.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Why does NDP or Green Party always fail find a "real progressive" leader time and time again?

    Why do you hide behind the "progressive" label? Why not outright own the fact that you want full blown communism? Cuz it seems you want full blown "everyone is equal but some are more equal than others" communism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    Idk enough about Canadian politics to comment on the NDP or the greens. I'd love to do some reading, I imagine the same exact patterns would play out there as they've played out everywhere, which is the people in power are not people for the people.

    I don't want "full blown communism", idk really what that even means. I'm positive you don't either because of how you're talking about it. What I do want is for you to own your business (or your share of the business if you work with others), the building you do your work in (or your share, etc), the tools you use to do your work, the profit of your work, the home you live in, and the right to do with your profits and your stuff as you see fit (as long as it doesn't endanger anyone else). I also want the money you pay towards your community (taxes) to benefit you and your neighbors far more than it benefits the people who are necessary to administer those community benefits (small, efficient government) or the people who would attempt to corrupt those administers. That means univeral healthcare, that means robust public transit, that means free education and quality libraries and protected parks. That means renewable energy and strong regulatory bodies. That means a no more than sufficient sized military and strong trade bonds. That means easy immigration and emigration, so governments are held accountable via immigration.

    I don't care what you call that, but you have to recognize that as the best future for all people, the most cost efficient future, and the one that would do the most objectively good and good based on any major religion I think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    Communism is a stupid, archaic idea that has not and will never work. It's no different than chasing an 'islamic utopia' or a Mormon 'zion'.

    I'm with you on most of it with some caveats. You can't build strong social nets and public services with local taxes and then open the floodgates to everyone in the world. You either limit access to the services and benefits for those who didn't pay or severely limit immigration. Can't have both simultaneously.

    This isn't to say "immigrants are the reason Canada has issues" but I'm not naive enough to pretend immigration itself doesn't affect anything at all. Both negative as well as positive.

    NDP and Green Party are ideological parties that pretend to be for the workers but they're only in it for themselves and their unrealistic, fanciful delusions. Exactly as you said, they're people in power who are not for the people.

  • source
  • parent