all 43 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 82 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

The shape of a helmet is important for how it handles shocks and impacts. I doubt this thing is as protective as a similarly heavy helmet with a plain old bowl shape.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I'm no safety engineer... but wouldn't the contoured top take some glancing blows, and rather than deflecting off the side of the head, convert then into direct hits on top of the head?

    Like, isn't this basically a concussion scoop?

    Wouldn't the stiff wide brim convert hits that previously would have missed your head into neck tortion or compression?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    The brim could cause an issue. Imagine two items falling in rapid succession. With a bowl helmet the first one glances off, second one hits and you’re protected.

    Now with the cowboy hat, first one hits the brim and flips the hat off your head. Second one…. Yeah, that’s gonna suck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    Yep. Firefighting helmets have a strap for that reason.

    I think that it'd be way better to loosely attach a thin, lightweight, cardboard or thin plastic brim to a 'real' hardhat than use one of the faux cowboy hats.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 0 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)
  • [–] 37 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    Looking at the inside picture you can see the inside contours of the Stetson top, I think we're looking at a straight up hat shaped helmet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I think the entire thing is plastic. The photos show how shiny the rim is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    As someone who does have one at work, they are all plastic and Fully ANSI rated. I don't wear it, mostly because it's ridiculously impractical for tight quarters, but also the opening for your head is a fixed size, and my head is just a little too big, so it doesn't really fit me that well. Still, it's funny to whip out on occassion

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

    Some of those are legit OSHA compliant.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    Possibly not for much longer. I see those stupid cowboy hat hard hats worn by GCs on occasion, but more and more I’ve seen a push by safety for Type II, side impact rated, hard hats. Pretty soon everyone’s might need to use the rock climbing looking hard hats with the chin strap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Just got done with a hurricane in NW Florida. Line guys from all over the US were wearing similar helmets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    They just make sense. Like if you’re just wearing a standard type 1 hard hat, and you fall, your hard hat isn’t staying on your head. Plus type 2 are side impact rated, which is the main feature.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 21 points 3 weeks ago

    M’Safety.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Not sure how bad it would be in practice, but the divot on the top of this hat seems like it might funnel things that would have glanced off a standard hardhat into a solid impact at the top of the head instead. And the brim could likewise be problematic.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    Yeah, I could see the brim being useful for shielding from the sun, but would probably want to use a shape like a pith helmet instead:

    That way the brim might actually even offer useful protection, although should still test that it's not dangerous when you fall off a roof or whatever. Could probably just make the brim out of cloth in that case, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    From wearing regular ones (okay many years ago working in wood sort of mills/production but not long either) I'm not sure the divot would make much a difference if proper clearance from sides to the inside harness, though guess may force impact in a way not intended for proper safety gear.

    Still doesn't seem quite right to me, cause you wouldn't want your head knocked to a side if the brim was hit.

    Probably a reason they were never designed in that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    unfortunately most sites ive worked on outright ban these. either on the "ppe required" sign on the fencing/gates outside, or mentioned in some sort of orientation.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Needs a high-vis (and stylish) stripe.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    Makes sense, working out in the sun

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    First piece of debris knocks the helmet off hitting the brim, second goes for the coup de grace

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    In other news, the safety manager has hired two new people to manually check the heatwave of every special jackass on the worksite, instead of just glancing at it.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    You keep using that word

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    You can also get these in smoke tinted transparent. Not sure why you would want to though.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    so a fire helmet? looks like a cairns with a crush on the top lol.

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 3 weeks ago

    Western-style hardhats have been a thing since the 90's.

  • source