all 47 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 79 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)
  • [–] 33 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    I don't think that's the appropriate action. It's against the law. They should be tried for committing the crime. Anyone with knowledge should be held accountable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    Disqualified by who?

    Yeah, neither of these are happening. It's a crime though. They should (not will) face criminal consequences, not just a disqualification.

    (Edit: Just FYI, I originally copied your question, but "whom" is not correct here. Just use "who" if you don't know how to use it. It doesn't make people look smart. Anyway, "whom" is for the subject of the verb. "Who" here is performing the action of disqualification. "They disqualified whom" would be where "whom" is used. I don't really care if people just use "who" all the time, but it really bothers me when people go out of their way to use "whom" but don't actually know when to use it. It isn't just for the end of the sentence.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I love that you completely misread my comment (I never once said 'disqualified') and spent a great deal of effort to act like a pedantic grammar snob.

    You're wrong, by the way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago

    The one at the top of this chain did. The one I was responding to.

    That page disagrees with you though. The thing being acted upon gets whom. That's the rule. That entire page is just different situations where that can happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    What journalists need to do is ask Trump why he can't afford to pay for his ads himself if he's so rich?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    He does own a "media" company. I'd be willing to bet that he billed himself for the work like he charges the Secret Service to stay at his hotels.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 54 points 3 weeks ago* (3 children)

    They didn't order them off the air, they ordered the Trump admin to take them down. Which they will promptly just ignore like the rest of their rulings, because there is no accountability. As my friend Coffeezilla says, crime is legal.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    People need to grow a fucking spine and say no to doing illegal things for Donnie dinkie diddle.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 43 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

    I guess donnie will be having another tirade about the mean ol' judges.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

    that was the point.

    Sure he can't have the ads... but now he has a talking point for all his rallies. A talking point he can misrepresent about how the judges are corrupt, and the deep state is trying to silence him (and them). And his idiot followers will ask no questions, follow up on no parts of the story, they will just accept it as gospel.

    THAT's the real ad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] 10 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    Is he really getting that much turnout at his rallies?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    What's the endgame? That's the real question. He's almost too fat and old and shitty to keep going. Is it really just to protect his name? We joke, but he really doesn't give a shit about anyone else. So is this all really only so we don't talk about his Epstein Island Excursions? Because that's etched in stone. In caves. Good luck finding it, chomos.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    They voted for the biggest waster and grift of all. They complain about using taxes for public benefits, believe there is so much fraud and people scamming the system, then elect the biggest grifter of all, so dumb and will double down on stupidity over and over and nothing will help. We give the answers to the exam and they still fail and the world suffers!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    Ooooooooohhhhh. This is a spoke of the pitchfork!!! An actual probable offense of the constitution!!!

    Do you think he heard me talking about the army of his sycophants & critics joining forces to toss him into Boston Harbor

    "No taxation without representation and no Epstein vacations! No bombing of nations and no dodging implications. No sucking Putin's butt in a gas station. No dragging your nuts over the constitution and no more explanations!! Bill & Ted said it best when they said "Station" "

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    I'm sure they'll comply

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    If they aren't removed, I predict a sternly worded letter is in Trump's future

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    ..and another thing!!!!

    If everything is gonna be censored fucking blur "his* droopy-twat neck! It looks like Eath's ugliest vagina.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    Bet that they won’t stop and no one will do shit about it.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/politics@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I got so pissed when I saw "paid for by the US Government" below a trump campaign ad this weekend...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago

    That'll teach him!

  • source