all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 21 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Unpopular opinion, but this is right and good.

I do think we should be using the metric system, but I think three stacked footballs, or whatever the fuck makes it easier for people to visualize it, is a good thing. Some of us just don't have brains geared toward hearing an arbitrary number and visualizing that size in real terms.

So, yeah, right 30cm, and show me a damn football, or two dollar bills, or a cake pan, or whatever i may have that can help me actually visualize the size.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    My main qualm is that they just added them with GIMP or such. You can't really use it for estimating the height, because they also just ballparked the perspective.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I was going to say, even not being into sports I still understand quite well how tall that stand is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    On the other hand, TIL that these footballs are longer than the diameter of actual footballs the rest of the known world uses- and I'm still unsure if this item's height. 🤷🏼‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    In the one dimension, yeah. Less volume though. (I did have to check that just now to be sure, but I figured it would be.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    Agreed, I'd guessed the same, but I did interact with both just yesterday... when a few geniuses thought it clever to play with them inside the fenced dog park, and then were somehow surprised the dozen+ dogs assumed they were invited. 🙆🏼‍♂️

    That aside, the diagram does nothing for me beyond reminding me how stupid they think we are— and they're nearly half right. 😶

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    They should do the height in feet and the width in inches for the full imperial experience.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    The grammar pisses me off more than the image.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The world is leaving us behind. The US will be a third world nation.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Fractional inches even. Blech.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 23 comments in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 22 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    44 pounds = roughly 17.6 rotisserie chickens.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Big Mac uses 1/8 lb patties. I would wager they are closer to 1/3 or 3/8 of a pound

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    They are referred to a 10:1 patties, so 1/10 of a pound each.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Omg my work kept telling us during covid if we didn't know what 6' was just image two shopping carts. I fucking hated that shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Except the drug dealers. They use metric.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I doubt many Americans know what the size of an American football is.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago
    [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    True. Some of us do know how to use commas, though.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    It's called a football. Only 11 inches long. Not even spherical. Smh.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Don't get me started on short forms. Lbs and oz?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    lbs is from libra, the Latin word for "scale". oz is from onza, the Spanish ounce.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    pd and oc would make more sense in an English-speaking country. Here again, the metric system is easier to understand. (We won't talk about Claude Emile Jean-Baptiste Litre.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Right, though by nature of being an archaic system, it is susceptible to archaisms in terminology as well.

    By extension, the UK should then change the iconography of the Pound Sterling (£) from a stylized L to a stylized P.

  • source
  • parent