This must be US centric yeah? I am in a union in Denmark as an engineer, and was when I was specifically a software engineer too.
I hope it can happen everywhere, it's been great for us in the few years I've been part of it.
This must be US centric yeah? I am in a union in Denmark as an engineer, and was when I was specifically a software engineer too.
I hope it can happen everywhere, it's been great for us in the few years I've been part of it.
I'm in one right now. There's a ton of guilds too in the US.
Got me a raise and fought a RTO sillyness.
As their jobs keep getting devalued, by AI (whether appropriate or not), and they are increasingly treated as unskilled labor, there will be more pressure to organize in order to mitigate losses in pay and benefits.
Tech workers needed to unionize yesterday. The trillion dollar investment to automate away white collar work should have us all organizing. Unfortunately, software engineers tend to be very tepid and don't want to rock the boat. I've also found myself contracting a lot lately which gives me substantially less power to organize. But even the tendency towards contracting is one that disempowers workers and makes them feel disposable.
Unionization desperately needs to happen.
If it was possible to create a union without interacting with each other, it would already be done.
I remember an old coworker said he was anti union. "I'd just find another job if I didn't like the one I had", he said. Bold claim.
And that was true back then, which was essentially the reason why no one bothered to organize. Tech jobs were one of the highest paying jobs and it was easy to jump ship. Now with companies (stupidly) thinking AI can replace everyone, suddenly tech jobs are no longer as secure as before. And maybe that will finally start pushing workers to organize.
My personal bet would be no. They’ll automate themselves away and slovenly play the corporate game before unionising. As a collective that is. Perhaps there’s lots to say about the culture of the profession, but I suspect it’s just too childish and spoilt.
I am in a union, and I think everyone should join or start one too. It's important to lay the groundwork for a strong union while you are still in a secure position, for the day you may not be. Like tech workers are seeing now.
I've had colleagues who don't see the need to join a union because they have such strong protection in their contract so union memberships are dwindling in some areas... those people are incredibly short-sighted and don't seem to get that a strong union got those protections into their contract before they even started the job, and a weak union can see those strengths becoming hollowed out in time.
Use your strength to protect the weak. If nothing else then because you may one day become weakened yourself.
CAIT: Collective Action in Tech and the Tech Workers Coalition are both trying. Support them as best you can.
no, especially if they are all getting laid off, or barely getting hired. the time to do it was like 10 years ago, when they were hiring in-demand, even then laying them off will likely negate the union anyways if they arnt hiring them back.
Should we? Yes. Will we? Software Engineers are overall too prideful for that
Tech Workers Coalition exists, as does IWW, though neither fit what most folks think of when they think of unions
Nope. They're too economically right wing self-absorbed to unionize.
Speak for yourself. I don't feel that way. Nobody I know or work with feels that way.
Problem isn't the bunch of us, it's the one's who're getting well compensated for their work. Tech has a very uneven pay, plus it's susceptible to outsourcing. If anything Tech would require super globalized union, something that I don't think has a precent.
No.
Unionize mostly occurs for working class folks, esp those working in the public sector or for a utility/infrastructure type of service.
Software Engineers are not working class people, they don't do public or utility types of work. There also is no point of collective bargaining for them as they don't have centralized skills or a centralized set of employers like most union jobs do.
There also is no point of collective bargaining for them as they don't have centralized skills or a centralized set of employers like most union jobs do.
If you think "software engineers" don't have skills as comparably fungible as carpenters or factory works either you're not a programmer or your code is hot garbage.
It's also irrelevant with regards to unionization. Actors,.writers, lawyers, and doctors all have unions, and the last two are so old and so pervasive that it's easy to mistake them for something else.
Software Engineers are not working class people
You're regurgitating propaganda designed to divide us.
"Working class" mean you work for a living. If your primary source of income is selling your labor, you're working class. If you punch a clock or if you own a business where the main product is provided by your labor (electrician, plumber, small business owner), you're working class. Income doesn't matter. If you're retired, that still counts.
If your primary source of income is dividends, interest, passive income from investments or assets, or businesses where the main product is provided by the labor of others, you're not working class because you don't have to get up and go to work every day to make a living; other people have to get up and go to work every day to make your living for you.
they don’t do public or utility types of work.
Never heard of digital infrastructure or the internet, huh?
the internet is owned by private companies. including all the infrastructure.
the only thing that is public is ICANN and the standards.
all 37 comments