[an orange character is driving a bulldozer, facing a house]
I am going to bulldoze your house

[a yellow character is shocked]

[yellow asks politely, hands clasped]
Could you please not do that?

[orange, pushing the bulldozer's controls, answers]
NO!

[yellow walks away from their house, looking dismayed]
Well, I guess I tried to do everything I could
Too bad

[orange smiles smugly as they bulldoze yellow's house]

https://thebad.website/comic/respectable_resistance

top 94 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 120 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I am going to delete your post

Image of a bulldozer on soil; credit to MathKnight on Wikimedia Commons

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 105 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Could you please not do that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 97 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    its not like its going to matter. they are bulding an interstellar highway tomorrow.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 93 points 1 month ago (17 children)

    Bit late to object now, the plans have been available in the planning office for the past nine months.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago* (13 children)

    I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (12 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (11 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Ah well, the lights had probably gone

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (9 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    But look, you found the notice, didn't you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Yes. Yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying "Beware of the Leopard."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    ... It's not as if it's a particularly nice house

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I'm sorry, but I happen to like it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Oh shut up. Shut up and go away, and take your bloody bypass with you. You haven't got a leg to stand on and you know it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Some factual information for you. Have you any idea how much damage that bulldozer would suffer if I just let it roll straight over you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    he was probably happier to bulldoze my house than i am sad to lose

    the worlds total happiness increased

    so whatever

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 49 points 1 month ago
    [–] 24 points 1 month ago (19 children)

    How could Our Cause have failed? I upvoted and downvoted everything I was supposed to!

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] [S] 15 points 1 month ago (18 children)

    We even signed the big petition and did an op-ed in the WaPo, guess it's time to take the L and move on, nothing else can be done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 month ago (17 children)

    nothing else can be done.

    Why aren’t you doing it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Quit my comfy regular job six years ago to become a full time activist.

    Didn't feel like being passive in the era of rising fascism and extinction level threat climate change.

    I'm probably not the person you should be asking that question to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    Six years and this is where the worlds at. Seems you’re just as ineffective as everyone else. Good thing you post edgy comments though, that’ll turn the tide.

    I'm probably not the person you should be asking that question to.

    You’re exactly who I should be asking that question to; smugly superior writing cute little comics to attack and divide people.

    If narcissistic triangulation was a meal you shoved it down your gullet in one go and asked for more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    Aye, cute performative anger right there.

    The goal has never been to save the world, one person alone can't do that. The goal is to do our best to help those who are suffering from the current state of society, while building collective momentum in order to achieve structural change.

    I've been doing extremely well on both of those goals, thank you very much for inquiring so politely.

    Your life seems sad if you've reached the point where all you can do is bark and bite through a screen, maybe you'd have a better outlook on life if you too tried to follow whatever your dreams and ideals are. It helps become a calmer person. I'll keep posting my comics. If you ask nicely, I'll send you a kiss emoji next time. Have a beautiful day!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    lol, go back to your pithy comics couched in the guise of social commentary.

    Seems like that and ad hominem arguments are what you’re good at.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Sure, I love making them, I'll make a lot more!

    Pot calling the kettle hominem buddy, see you in the next one :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago

    Sure, I love making them, I'll make a lot more!

    I’m sure you will. I imagine they feed your superiority complex without actually engaging in any meaningful action.

    Pot calling the kettle hominem buddy, see you in the next one :)

    Using and ad hominem after being called out for an ad hominem? Bold move. However, you won’t see me at all. That’s one of my favorite things about blocking people!

    Enjoy your circle jerk!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

    I just assume people who say this shit are snitches and deserve what they gonna get.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I just assume you and others like you would rather fall into the trap of division than foster unity to go after the select few who actually pull the strings and manipulate events.

    I agree in part though; you all deserve what your going to get and it will be really unfortunate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    You're up in here attacking a person who very sincerely claims to spend their time doing the things you're complaining about people not doing. This is the ally you seem to want, but yet here you are. Just doubling down and getting hostile with anyone on the topic after you made a bad assumption.

    What unity are you here fostering lmao? Kinda seems like it's you being the divisive one here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    This is the ally you seem to want

    You’re wrong. I have no use for those who insult and degrade those who’ve taken any action of any sort.

    The rhetoric from OP in this comic is to deride the character who made an effort as β€œnot being enough”.

    The ally I want is one who draws this comic but with the last panel having community stepping up to bolster that individual and encourage them to continue resisting with their support. A comic that shows how the everyday people are stronger together when they support each other.

    I’ll take allies that are willing to try what they’re capable of over those who lift themselves up by shitting on others for β€œnot doing enough”.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    Your original bad take was:

    Why aren't you doing it?

    It has been you, from the jump, shitting on others, insulting and degrading others for "not doing enough". Like what are you even saying, are we in the same thread? You started this by doing the thing you are literally now complaining about others doing.

    [Edit: the rhetoric from the comic that I read is attacking the assertion that we can politely, civilly, solve heinous problems such as what's depicted. It's your idea that the comic represents shitting on people who do try. That's been your interpretation that others don't seem to share. And then you respond by doing the literal thing you are complaining about the comic saying, but the comic didn't even say that. You have layers of wrong going on here and I think you're just too defensive at the moment to see what's going on.]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    It has beenΒ you, from the jump, shitting on others

    Nope, just OP.

    the rhetoric from the comic thatΒ IΒ read

    I question your reading comprehension and understanding of context. The comic, as well as OPs comments don’t fit your narrative at all.

    You have layers of wrong going on here and I think you're just too defensive at the moment to see what's going on.

    You disagree and attack me as being β€œdefensive” for (checks notes) defending my position.

    As for my original question, the OP sarcastically hints at the need for action beyond what’s been taken. I call out armchair critics who like to criticize others for not doing what they themselves won’t do.

    It’s awful easy to risk someone else’s freedom and safety.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    This is pointlessly hypothetical but does get across what I am trying to point out - if you magically were never involved in this thread, it was a stranger who had written what you have - and you came along and read what had been written by everyone.

    I strongly believe you would disagree with the way you've behaved here, if you were a stranger stumbling onto someone else doing this exact thing. You're not making the sense that you think you are.

    I wish you well, all done for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago

    if you magically were never involved in this thread, it was a stranger who had written what you have

    I would agree with them. We’d hold the same belief.

    You want to believe I’d disagree because you disagree.

    That’s the difference between us. I don’t need someone to agree with me to be allied in a shared cause, I just won’t tolerate cutting down others because their efforts, whatever they may be, are deemed not enough. It’s akin to purity testing and it does no one any good.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

    The public education system in America doesn't cover domestic violence against/by the state and state allies. There are some region exceptions but even those often don't hit the full range of violent protest.

    We're taught about the labor movement and civil rights movement primarily through the lens of peaceful or passive resistance. They're frequently presented alongside figures like Gandhi, who himself has had is image simplified and white-washed.

    I didn't know what Tulsa was until someone mentioned it online in a video essay. There is so much that I know only because the internet was open and history nerds started making youtube video essays and podcasts. Even then, I only know about things like the 1934 Minneapolis strike because I was in a construction worker's union.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 19 points 1 month ago* (4 children)

    My kink is teaching americans about the MOVE bombing. Somehow it's more known outside the USA than inside, you'd think a country bombing its own city 40 years ago would be a bigger deal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    I have read about this, but it was an adult, not when I was still in school. For all intents and purposes, I find that education about American History ends in the 1960s with the civil rights movement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 46 points 1 month ago (11 children)
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

    Didn’t that guy terrorize an entire town?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (7 children)
  • [–] 47 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    freedom fighter Weird antisocial asshole.

    Seriously this was all over being told to pay to connect to the town sewer instead of pumping sewage into an irrigation ditch. This guy was just an asshole that decided to destroy his town because he couldn't be a selfish fake-libertarian piece of shit and dump literal shit out in the open. The killdozer as an item is metal as fuck, but he died a pathetic shit-slinger who wrecked everyone else's property and then blew his brains out to dodge accountability.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvin_Heemeyer?wprov=sfla1

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (5 children)

    That's one extreme of the story. The other extreme is that he'd been doing it, along with every other business in that area, for years, because there's nothing out there. It's just sand and rock for miles in all directions. There's nothing to contaminate because nothing lives there.

    The only reason he got involved in anything is because he was told it wasn't going to cost him any money. He shows up and starts filling out the paperwork and it doesn't say what he was told; it says he has to pay (souces differ) something like $6K-20K for an easement so he can dig up city property to access the sewer line to connect to it. He doesn't sign that paper. Instead, he gets up and walks away from the table, leaving behind the paperwork he'd already filled out, which included his application to connect to city utilities. Since he filled out the application, they file it, process it, and approve it, which is what "allows" city hall to start levying fines against him for non-compliance.

    Every other business in that area continued to do the exact same thing as him, but only he was being fined for it. What's more, if he'd just stayed home that day and never signed anything, there'd be nothing anyone could do about it.

    He knew he didn't understand the system, so he didn't want anything to do with it. Against his better judgement, he tried to comply. He started off acting in good faith. When he found out the other party wasn't, he walked away from the deal. He should have taken every piece of paper with his signature on it with him, but he didn't because he didn't understand how the system works.

    He thought that since he didn't sign everything, that meant none of it was any good. When he got the letters from city hall about the fines, he did what he'd done with all the mail from city hall for years: threw it in the trash.

    A city government, trying to expand its power and control, absued the system to extort money from someone who wanted nothing to do with them. If city hall had just left him, and well enough, alone, everything that followed could have been avoided.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    As someone not extremely familiar with the details of the situation, I don't believe Heemeyer was in the right, but do you have any sources about what actually went on?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago
    [–] 17 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    The only way to stop a bulldozer is with a bigger bulldozer covered in concrete armor.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Long live the legend of killdozer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    What Israel expects from Gaza....

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (6 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    Seems to fit better with the US government trampling on their citizens rights, destroying every international diplomacy norm, accelerating the destruction of the environment, and all around being comical levels of evil. And the opposition has largely done nothing because they are trying maintain decorum and not upset corporate donors while being steamrolled by fascism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Could be. It could also be about discourse, some people will condemn any form of protest that actually has impacts, and instead expect people to just do a peaceful protest that somehow uses magic and vibes to change the world

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    So what IDF is doing is good because it's effective.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    what? The IDF is not protesting, they are the aggressor. I think you misinterpreted my comment?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    They obviously weren't the original aggressor, but reacted to an atrocity (which also was a highly effective act) their enemy did first. So they chose to react not just by protesting, but instead by doing something highly effective. Which is what the comic is suggesting everyone should do.

    You might just admit that you think these rules apply to the side you hate and not to the side you like and be done with it. That of course precludes moral high-standing which seems to be the point here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • The atrocity was not at all effective since it didn't sabotage the Israeli state or the Israeli colonial project, instead it helped it. I don't think the author of the comic thinks October 7th 2023 was a good idea or a good thing whatsoever. The comic can totally be read as alluding to the Israel-Palestine conflict, but it can't really be turned around the way you do it. Israel is not just the original aggressor, they also provoked Palestinian aggression that lead to October 7th in the first place. Not to mention the state played a big role in Hamas getting into the position of power it is in today.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    This somehow seems very much tied to reality somehow in some way for some reason but I just can't tell why...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί