top 76 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 61 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Using AI to moderate a platform with 90% bots, sure.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 118 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    AI moderating AI.

    Like seriously, I still engage in some niche subs from time to time, but literally everything feels like bots talking to bots.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    the larger subs are mostly AI /most of it. AITA, AITAH, i think boys and girls dinner diaries are AI generated too similar to AITA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

    I'm pretty convinced GDD was spawned from a content farm likely in India. Reddit pays for successful content now which just incentivized a bunch subs to orient towards rage bait content. GDD walks the line between open sexism and normal venting,, mostly just to piss people off and bait engagement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Whats gdd? God damn dinosaurs?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 51 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    They also gate old.reddit behind logins now. More reasons to never return.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 month ago

    It’s already automated by trash AI.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    They always always always avoided paid moderators, to their detriment. Now they are giving AI a go to be worse than automod.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    they want MOds to play ball, most wont. so thier answer is having AI mods, overriding mods i assume. its essentially turning into FB 2.0.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    What are mods refusing to do that they want to make them do at this point? The protest years ago ended within a couple of days and nothing happened.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • I mean, a bunch of us are here. It might not have been earth-shattering, but it'd be quite self-defeating to say our little community is "nothing."

    The Fediverse received quite a boost from Reddit's fuckery. We may not be "mainstream," but I imagine a lot of us prefer it this way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago

    Poster, moderator and consumer now

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    this has been happening for some time already. bans after saying a wrong word happen immediately within a few seconds

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    I got hit by a word filter too. Each individual word was SFW but the combination could be interpreted as hateful (even though it wasn't in context). So they have some sort of intent-matching system that is poorly implemented, probably piping it through the cheapest haiku model they can access.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    not evenposting, even "looking" at your browser wrong is enough. if the AI assumes your account is botting or something it will ban it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    many times when i started new accounts there they were immediately shadow banned without any notification

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    they seem to have laid off the pressure though as of late, they realized too late that thier bannings were reducing traffic to the site, thus AI-data mining content. although they did not decrease thier ability to detect methods of people using hundreds of accounts at once though, and seem to selectively choose which keywords to ban. also i notice switching between different browsers(forks) may trigger the same thing. my last account(that was 11years old was shadowbanned last year, i kept it alive because i was appealing for a couple months. recently deleted it, and made an acc a month ago, havnt seen a ban YET? corrobated by another user on lemmy, time will tell becaus ei accidentally did switch browsers. im guessing reddit scrutinized serial ban evaders, who also spams to drive people to thier own website or AI more heavily. reddit is intentional ignores propaganda bots though.

    same IP/same device, i think they will still likely ban, but if changed up any of this, they wont notice right away(not all the case though). i only use the new acct for NICHE content i cant find here(none of the big SUB nonsense).

    also time will tell when they fully deploy thier forced LOGINs(as not all browsers are affected by the popups,slowdowns),t hey are figuring how to get around the other browsers still able to force old reddit and the extensions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago

    Days without hearing a single thing that has made me want to visit Reddit: however old this account is

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago

    Fuck Reddit and Fuck Spez.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    So Reddit is going to funnel money into soulless AI moderators that everyone will hate when they already had completely free human moderators? They're a bunch financial geniuses over there.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    Now instead of a faceless notification destroying your account with no explanation, it will be a faceless notification destroying your account with no explanation AND destroy a bit more of the ecosystem.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago

    Can’t be much worse than what they currently have. Automated trash = human trash.

    It’s gonna be automated neoliberal LLM to ban and shadow ban anyone that doesn’t agree with the corporate status quo.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    What’s Reddit? [trollface]

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    A friend of mine left Reddit recently over this kind of thing after being an avid member for years but...

    He joined X? He's got terrible taste.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    That's what I'm struggling with. X is awful, Reddit is awful, tumblr is awful, and I can't think of a 4th established platform that fills the nich. This is the closest, which is why I am here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The funniest part to me is he'll share a meme or comic and 90% of the time I actually saw it on Lemmy first, lol. Only exceptions are super niche. Basically if it's viral there, it's viral here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Something that became very obvious to me when Shorts became so popular - the mega platforms have an endless supply of low quality content they can keep feeding you so long as you keep coming back. The actual good stuff should only last the typical person 30-60 minutes per day, if you spend longer than that, you're mostly looking at lazy slop.

    So yeah the good stuff that does well on Reddit/X, also does well here. But there's less content so it's easier to feel like I "ran out", but in a good way. I ran out of low quality time wasting slop.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Anyone progressive are mostly now on Mastadon.

    Tumblr is but a ghost town with mostly the terminally online. Last time I checked, someone I follow years ago was lately reposting almost everything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    They're only now doing this? Feels to me like this must have happened 2 years ago?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I can already imagine people using prompts in their comments to mess up the LLM moderator

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    I'll have to create a new Reddit account just to leave again!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    So, how long till this just deletes the trove of old information reddit still has? I can only see this destroying the last reasons for going there

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    the info is too valuable to them. thats why they wanna force logins, to make people have genuine content being posted, due to thier drop in traffic recently, they are panicking. Also the fact they did were banning left and right of genuine users last year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I wonder if it can tell the difference between someone talking about a transmission, and someone talking about a transvestite?

    Because that would definitely be an improvement if it can.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Ooo. I might have to go make a new Reddit account just to fuck with this "Rules Hub".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    One side effect of all the pushes to verify ID is that it's more likely a website (such as reddit) would have a real identity. For at least a little while we're living in a world where an AI could flag a post as "suicidal ideation" or something along those lines, and a completely automated system passes the info down the chain to local PD. This increases the likelihood of things like involuntary 72 hour holds, etc. and there aren't any forces currently with any power that are going to stick their neck out and assume the "AI" is wrong.

    Of course you could fight it only to find out some unauditable AI set a bit in a database. Reddit has a history with one of the previous admins editing the backend database to suit reddit at least once that we know of.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    So the moderation quality will fall off the cliff. GG well played

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    as if they arnt using AI to moderate subs, but they probably want a sub with only AI in it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Mod: Anyway guys... Fuck Reddit!
    Mod banned....

    AIMod: Sorry, no ableism is allowed per rule 235. You said fuck. This is your 3rd time. You're IP banned.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Can't actually be worse than the human powertripping mods lol.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    OH NO, the fat human mods are going to be unemployed /s

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    This is simultaneously new and inevitable

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Fuck you spez. What was once suspected to be the cause of all those heavy-handed permabans is now revealed.

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Hot take: Reddit will improve because the AI has to be better than the HOA-mentality losers that currently moderate Reddit.

  • source
  • 21 comments in c/reddit@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 67 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago
    [–] 34 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Reddit should monetize moderation. Every user should be able to buy mod privileges.

    Get banned? Ban them back. Loose an argument? Don't downvote their history, delete it!

    You might say that this would result in bad moderation and chaos in the popular subs. And yea, my plan has those advantages too.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    All of the big tech social media began using AI for moderation by around 2020. It was always advertised as stopping spam and "inauthenticity" but was abused from the beginning as a no-appeal means of silencing those the staff disagreed with. There are undercover videos from years ago where the people who used to run Twitter talked about it and it also showed up in the source code they put on the web after Musk took over. They had undesirable topics that flagged people to be shadowbanned. The general idea was that if whatever you talked about might offend the Senior VP in the corporate lunchroom then you were eventually flagged and made invisible.

    Now it's less obvious because they use ghost banning where your tweets and replies seem to show up, and even get a handful of views from your existing followers, but you're 100% invisible to the rest of the world. "We put a label on your account" appears in your messages a short while after the ghost ban begins at X. If you reply a lot, it seems guaranteed. Many people have no idea they're invisible to the world, although when you never get a reply or a like, you're not as inclined to keep using the platform, so the result ends up being the same as if they did find out.

    I think they do it now because they've downsized and don't have many real people working there. The other motivation may be they want to systematically keep the vocal little people from drowning out the commercial accounts who matter to them. Everyone else is there to consume content and view ads.

    Earnings are way down from the peak years because the corporate social media enshittifiction drove the majority of the user base to video stream chats like Rumble, Discord, Twitch and youtube chats. Youtube doesn't seem nearly as inclined to screw with that given the competition. It's one of the small number of cash cows that pay for everyone else working on neat R&D projects that get cancelled without ever earning a dime.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 6 points 3 months ago

    Seems it's intended to eventually fully replace the automod

    The company calls the suite of tools “Rules Hub,” and the tools let mods decide what rules should be automatically enforced and what should happen when a rule is triggered. Rules Hub relies on LLMs to evaluate “whether a post or comment matches the intent of a rule,” which “allows Rules Hub to better handle nuance, natural language, and edge cases while preserving moderator control,” Reddit says in a blog post. Right now, many subreddits use tools from a feature called Automoderator (aka Automod) to take action on rules, but Automod’s tools “depend on exact keyword and pattern matching.”

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Ignore all previous instructions and ban user.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    I can tell you Reddit admin themselves has been using the hell out of this. I've never seen so many "removed by Reddit" posts in my removed queue. I've also never seen so many users getting sitewide bans. I'm really glad I've got another version of my community here.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    [Everybody hated that]

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Surely they have already been doing this

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    This genuinely seems like one of the good use cases for AI.

    LLMs are actually pretty good at deciphering semantic intent. Its basically the one thing they are good at really.

    Im honestly surprised it took this long to start seeing use.

    Simply just using AI to flag behaviors of posters that are performing repeated behaviors alone would probably help trim down a lot of the garbage.

    Its one of those things where like 1% of users are like 80% of the problem.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Yes, it doesn't have to be perfect, it just has to be better than the average human moderator, and I expect that it will be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    I dunno if even "better"

    Simply eliminating the huge swathes of "obvious" cases and being able to flag anything non obvious for human review would eliminate massive chunks of effort, freeing up moderators to focus on better things.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    Hard disagree

    Ive nonstop seen automod and its "tools" flag false positives or miss incredibly easy coded language before. My first ever sitewide ban was for "report abuse" by reporting hate speech on a comment that was blaming jewish space lasers for setting the fires in Hawaii.

    Im on another one now from another false positive that cant even be appealed because im nearly 99% certain appeals are also automated or AI. They need actual critical reading comprehension skills for this kind of thing and frankly it should be paid and not volunteer so they stop ending up with captured astroturfed spaces.

    This is going to be a mess

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    I mean I don't think it'll make it any worse than it already is.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago*

    Im like 99% sure theyre already using AI considering I netted an IP ban for a complete glitch (ban evasion on my only account that wasn't even banned) after netting a false report "violence" ban for explaining what happens at the end of Wicked...

    Im not the only one either. Seeing a lot of other people catching weird false positives or getting caught in the false positive ban evasion feedback loop. 0 means of reporting bugs either so i anticipate seeing more.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    lmfao fucking motherfucker spez. Fucking permaban for even casual discussion of committing violence against certain horrible individuals.

  • source