I usually connect with my server via ssh in a terminal and run basic commands. What's a better, more efficient and modern way of doing that? Especially considering ai and documentation along the way? I wonder if there's a better approach than "connect from remote and act local". Is there a method to "code local and push to remote"?

I use a fedora server with podman, caddyfile and vi.

all 61 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 87 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I wait for something to break. Then I yell "God fucking dammit, I don't have time for this right now!" and spend an hour triaging things before I just try docker down, pull, up and everything works.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    same. or i just df and see / 100%

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Early on I wrote a script for my user account to run df and save the output to a file, then a second script to read that file and if the drive was full send me an email.

    First, it failed because it couldn't send the email because the email service failed under full disk conditions.

    Second, it failed because it couldn't write the file to disk because the disk was full.

    Third, it failed because outbound SMTP was blocked by my ISP.

    I learned a lot about how well you can fail if you really put your mind to it. Now I have Home Assistant grabbing the disk stats for my machines and flagging anything over 90%.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 65 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 47 points 1 month ago*

    I just use ssh and manually type commands. Keep doing it and you will get good and it will become second nature.

    No need to burn tokens on basic tasks.

    Master your tools. Learn awk, sed, just, etc.

    Some shell customisation can help. For example I'm fond of zsh-auto-suggestions and skim. Makes me quicker.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    "code local and push remote" is only more efficient if you have a faulty connection with ssh or want to use a GUI editor that doesn't support remote connections. What you're doing is good. You can scoure for more "modern" ways that might have more glimmer and sparkly lights, but it won't improve efficiency.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Declarative configuration (like docker compose) is basically "code local, push remote", and it has a lot of benefits, including improving efficiency because you have a clearer idea of exactly what is set up on the server, to make it easier to debug or make changes.

    Contrast this with just sshing in and running a bunch of commands to install something. Then coming back months later and wondering "what files did I touch? what packagea did I install? Hmm dpkg log says I added X but then later I removed it, so was it important?" Etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    I write my NixOS configs in my PC, commit to the repo, then push it to the server. Then SSH in, and apply it. Or more likely, MOSH in.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    It’s good to get comfortable in the command line, including over ssh.

    Especially considering ai and documentation along the way?

    If I am going to ask AI or Google about something, I just do that to help me find the answer and then apply the answer myself. That way I learn, and can double check the AI isn’t hallucinating, at least on in obvious ways.

    As for documentation, I keep a notes folder with detailed notes on manual configuration I’ve done, how and why, and the things I’ve learned along the way. I’ve found it’s both useful to help remember the things I’ve learned, and it is useful to go back to refer to.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    A mix of prayer and bash scripts.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    I've been using a program someone on Lemmy has been writing: SSHPilot. It helps keep my server list organized and can easily ssh to the machines or open up a file browser for easy drag and drop of files if I have some quick files to move around. It copies ssh keys easily as well.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I ssh into it twice a year to perform updates but otherwise i leave it alone. Server's been chugging along for like a decade now.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Similar, but you might want to update more frequently with the huge number of critical security bugs being discovered by AI recently

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Twice a year is crazy. I suppose most of my maintainence is adding drives (I'm a creator and I definitely totally need to archive all of my footage), but I also run a fair few apps that have needed manual update steps, so I do all my updates manually so I can fix stuff if it breaks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Nothing wrong with good old ssh. My VMs are different enough that building and maintaining ansible playbooks or something similar would be a bigger task than actually doing it in the traditional way. Maybe I could benefit by building simple playbooks to populate user accounts, ssh keys, smtp relay settings and other common things, but I don't really set up new servers that often that it would justify spending time to set up tools for that.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    My target is terraform to provide VMs on my miniPC and ansible to configure them. For my nas, probably a basic distro then some ansible stuff to setup stomate.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    self hosted gitlab. each server has a repo with all the docker configs and application configs. also have any scripts for the server itself on there as well, things like required libs, network configs, etc.

    I also have a repo dedicated for let's encrypt SSL that retrieves new certs every month. then on each server is an install script scheduled that pulls the certs down, installs them, and restarts any services automatically.

    should anything go wrong, I have a siem monitor that will alert me that a service failed to start etc.

    currently running four servers like this with varying degrees of complexity.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I spent a while getting Ansible to be able to setup and maintain my server(s). And ended up not using it as much as I should, mostly because the computer I used to run Ansible from became a "Steam Machine" so I'm rarely sitting on it with a keyboard now and I don't want to have personal info and keys on my work computer.

    But it was a good learning, and useful while I used it. Now I just use ssh and compose files directly.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    You upgraded from ansible to ssh. As someone forced to write yaml for ansible professionally and has used many other config management tools, I can only commend your success at escaping ansible.

    Try mgmtconfig.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    I created git repos on my main workstation for each homelab server/service I maintain that keeps:

    • documentation
    • notes
    • lessons learned
    • scripts, configs
    • runbooks
    • backup details
    • security audit details
    • log items that need attention
    • infrastructure

    I just point a local LLM (offline model that runs on my workststion) into those repos and ask it to perform certain things on those servers. It can do things like update packages, install packages, make config changes, set/check permissions, read logs (and fix errors in real time), and check the health of the overall system.

    I have it run pre backups before making changes, then post backups once its done.

    Once changes are in place and everything is running okay, I ask it to update documentation in the repo and tag the release.

    I use opencode that connects to a llama.cpp service. opencode lets me gate the AI so that any elevated commands that it needs to run (e.g. sudo or ssh), I have to approve it. It cant just go around making changes without permission.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    What models are you using? What hardware are you running them on? I’m curious if I can replicate your success

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago*

    Hardware I'm running:

    • 8/16 AMD CPU
    • 32GB system RAM
    • 12GB GPU VRAM (AMD)

    I'm mainly using these MoE models:

    Qwen-3.6-35B-A3B

    • Q4_K_M quant quality
    • 128k context (conversation length before it compacts)
    • Gives me about 260 prefill and 19 token gen speeds

    Gemma4-26B-A4B

    • Q8 quant quality
    • 128k context length
    • Gives me about 190 prefill and 14 token gen speeds
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    nixos, mostly. It has a very steep learning curve but if it breaks I’m just "whatever, rollback now, fix properly later".

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Ansible and terraform can bath do with you want though for a single server I'd consider them both to be a somewhat overkill. But then again homelabbing often is about overkill.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    set the server as git remote and push there directly. set hooks to deploy. I do that for a static site. Is my little iac solution. Search for alternatives to "infrastructure as code". It can go from simple dockerfile to swarms or kubernetes..

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I use Gitlab for all configurations ans then I have a Gitlab runner in my K3S cluster so I can deploy locally for free

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If you're connecting from a system that's a long distance away from your server in terms of latency, mosh can be more comfortable to use than ssh.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    I'll take the maverick and share my niche position. I did most if not all my proxmox setup and configuration via complete reliance on LLMs. Now, before anyone says "why would you do that", and I'll be straight up. I was high for all of it, and not a small blaze I'm talking regularly stoned for months. And I'll say it "got me by" for the frame work. It worked? Sorta. Music, Plex, immich, docker, arr stack, podman. Now, I can't say I fully understand it still and I've done a lot of changes since that point last year and I figured it out by asking the model to backtrack what we did and I wont lie it helped me better learn how to question the models for my job, and It did decent documnetation over my server. But again, I was literally high doing it

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I have a kubernetes cluster inside of Proxmox vm's, generally I write a deployment, commit it to a git repo and then use argocd to deploy it in the cluster.

    This is not something I would advise to anyone but the clinically insane, but for me there is a certain zen in having everything in git like that. It's for me the only way I can manage the 60ish applications I run without it having a permanent spot in my brain.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I have a git repo with all my docker files, config, notes, etc. I have a main overview file covering the overall system and then a directory for each machine. I edit things on my local machine, then scp and ssh to the various remotes. Once I’m happy with my changes, I commit and push to my Forgejo install on my NAS in case my main computer fails. Secrets, passwords, and keys are in my Vaultwarden.

    I don’t use AI for it, but a local model could probably give me the commands to do whatever I wanted based on the repo.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Depends what you're trying to do, really

    If you're talking about going in and restarting containers and checking logs, there are tools like Portainer that give a nice UI you can quickly use from your phone

    If you're talking about repetitive tasks, sometimes there's a tool to automate it already (e.g. updates via watchtower, unattended-upgrades), and if not, you can write a script and possibly run it via a cronjob if that makes sense

    If you're talking about doing new stuff, you either stick with the SSH & shell commands, or you look into IaC tools like ansible as another reply mentioned. Another option is something like Nix where the setup is defined in config, so you make your changes there

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    with dokplpy as a server docker managementweb gui.

    for the code push workflow:

    • keep your normal git workflow, commit & push
    • set up a git hook in git & dokploy that rebuilds from source on every push
    • or do it on a schedule and build once a day or whatever

    If you're project has an unusual way to build, you could also do a git action that pushes a docker image out somewhere, depending on yoyr git provider.

    There are probably infinitely many ways to autodeploy something.

    If you need a step bt step breakdown, I can give you a guide based on my personal website, but that might not apply to your project.

  • source
  • There are probably multiple flashy clients and gui's for it, but if you're already used to the terminal, I'd recommend rsync. This might be the wrong syntax but something like rsync -av ~/local/project servername:/var/www/html/ would take your local files and update the web directory of your server with only the files that are more recent. Rsync will even read your ssh config file so if you're got an entry for your server you can just use the host name.

    I ran a little blog for a while using a static site generator so I setup the git server on my web server and wrote a git hook where every time I pushed to the repo the server would pull it's cloned copy of the repo into the html directory. Took me a few hours to setup but it made updating the blog as simple as pushing to the repo.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Local ansible playbook, easily replayable and documented. This in a git repo and you're fine.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Tailscale service configs for HTTPS ingress and DNS resolution. Podman quadlets / podlets for everything except backup software and tailscale itself. I use the open version of VS code to edit config files in place, but I push them to a private git as well as having them backed up. Storage for app data, media, and configs (everything but OS) is via NFS shares from my gaming PC's RAID volume. I can run a plenty of apps on an old thinkpad this way. After you configure the first few quadlets with tailscale, it gets real straightforward, but there is a learning curve. Yes, I use SSH, but it is the remote conmection and terminal in Code.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I deploy with ansible keys and install ssh with a keys-only config and only ansible access.

    Then I run some standard installs and configs with ansible and all future updates to apt, apk and docker are done with one ansible playbook.

    I don't include the ansible host itself in the automation, nor my workstation, just to prevent everything from being broken at once if something goes wrong.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Proxmox web UI to manage my six containers. Sometimes I use sftp (ssh) to modify files in a desktop editor instead of nano over a web interface. Recently I broke things and had to go down to the basement with a keyboard and monitor to rollback my Omada container. I kinda want to make that part easier but it’s so infrequent it’s probably not worth it.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    To manage containers I use Arcane, which I can access from anywhere. Let's me create, update, delete, basically anything Podman can do.

    For other stuff I still just SSH. I have up set up that I can do it remotely (with an extra security step), but I don't need to do it very often.

    Worth noting that some security stuff is automated, eg non-breaking updates on the OS and log monitoring.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Which one? Lol.

    TrueNAS is mostly via the webgui but I use SSH when needed.

    I have two Ubuntu 26.04LTS VM's running on TrueNAS. One is going to be my web host the other is for FrigateNVR and local AI processing. They are both managed via SSH. The web host has a FIDO2 ssh key for access, the other is a standard key and is not web accessible. Both can be accessed via remote desktop when at home.

    Docker containers are managed via DockHand. I have about 50 containers running across the above hosts right now.

    HomeAssistant is managed via the webgui and SSH when needed. It runs on its own hardware (Odroid N2+)

    My traveling local host/ap/dhcp server is primarily managed over USB via SSH. Files are managed via SFTP.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    It depends on what I’m doing I suppose. I run my main VM on Proxmox, so I mainly use its web interface for any VM work. For all the containers within, I’ve been really loving Dockhand lately, it’s just as easy to use as Portainer, it even checks for updates for me AND gives me a link for the release notes so I can decide whether to upgrade or not.

    Most other things like file transfers or editing my Caddyfile I do through SSH. Can’t beat simplicity sometimes!

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    SSH but i mostly do everything over dockhand which is a webuj for docker

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Everything is in docker or a virtual machine that starts on boot. Docker containers are managed with Dockhand's web ui. Once a month I ssh and "sudo apt upgrade" but that's it.

    I tried to use olivetin to avoid having to ssh but I ran into errors I haven't had time to investigate yet.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I connect to my server using ssh and use tmux as a persistent session. Configuration wise, I use NixOS and edit the config files directly on the server via emacs.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Ansible to deploy services in docker compose stacks and backups with resticprofile.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    DNS Domain Name Service/System
    Git Popular version control system, primarily for code
    ISP Internet Service Provider
    LVM (Linux) Logical Volume Manager for filesystem mapping
    NAS Network-Attached Storage
    NFS Network File System, a Unix-based file-sharing protocol known for performance and efficiency
    Plex Brand of media server package
    RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks for mass storage
    SFTP Secure File Transfer Protocol for encrypted file transfer, over SSH
    SMTP Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
    SSH Secure Shell for remote terminal access
    VPS Virtual Private Server (opposed to shared hosting)
    ZFS Solaris/Linux filesystem focusing on data integrity
    k8s Kubernetes container management package

    [Thread #113 for this comm, first seen 26th Sep 2026, 12:40] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Premise: most, if not all, of my services run in containers.

    I have recently moved to docker context. It’s a pretty cool feature that I don’t see mentioned that often. Essentially it allows to run docker commands from your machine and tunnel them via SSH to your server. What I like about this is that I need all the compose file in my main machine and structure them into a repository so that I don’t have everything scattered around. The new approach I have implemented very recently is this.

    One monorepo with one folder per server and in each one a folder per service containing docker compose and .env files. With dotenv I sent the docker context whenever I enter a specific folder, so as soon as I cd into that folder, any docker command I run from there would be tunneled to the correct server.

    For everything that does not run in docker, which is not much I think at the moment only vector to collect metrics and logs, I use Ansile. In this case the need is that I want Vector to run on all servers so Ansible is the better choice here.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Around 50-50 between SSH and Portainer (although I've been meaning to migrate from Portainer to Arcane so I can have my compose files in git)

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago

    Usually I put handcuffs on her every night, to keep her off of me, and only feed her the highest grade sushi and meat. It keeps her hair shiny, keeps good health, and complaints down to a minimum. I make sure she gets adequate sleep on an expensive mattress while I sleep on a 2 inch futon on the floor.

    Oh wait... wrong kind of server.

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Hermes + maybe $5-10 worth of tokens if I need more compute than ollama can provide (on a busy month). Running everything in a nice podlet setup and have reduced maintenance down to trivial levels. Config gets occasionally shipped to GitHub

    In theory I might lose the ui if it bricked itself but in reality that doesn’t happen.

  • source