As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu returned to Israel after using his United Nations speech "to repeat baseless lies meant to sanitize his genocide of Palestinians" in the Gaza Strip, The New York Times on Friday corroborated Haaretz's recent reporting that the Israeli leader was warned about the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack that resulted in the war.

Haaretz reported earlier this month that during a September 2023 phone call, United Arab Emirates President Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan told Netanyahu about now-deceased Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar's plans "for a major event" targeting Israel.

Netanyahu not only denied receiving that notice but also sent a "warning letter," threatening to file a libel lawsuit against the Israeli newspaper and journalists Shlomi Eldar and Ruth Yuval. In response, Haaretz said that it stood by their work.

A trio of Times journalists backed up that exposé on Friday, reporting that "a person who said they had spoken with Sheikh Mohammed and another person who said they had been briefed by someone on the call between the two leaders told The New York Times that the Emirati leader had secretly reported to Mr. Netanyahu that Hamas was considering a major attack."

"The warning from the Emirati leader, however, never reached the leaders of Israel's security establishment, according to five former senior Israeli officials. Mr. Netanyahu gathered his security chiefs days later, on October 1, 2023, for a meeting about the situation in the Gaza Strip, and never mentioned the warning," reported the US-based paper, which reviewed meeting minutes.

The minutes show that Netanyahu "pushed back when some security officials said that Israel should consider military strikes against senior Hamas leaders in Gaza who were overseeing attacks against Israelis in the West Bank," and suggested such action "might sabotage the prospect of Saudi Arabia establishing diplomatic relations with Israel," according to the Times.

While the Emirati foreign ministry and Netanyahu's office did not respond to the Times' requests for comment, the paper also revealed that months after the reported September 2023 phone call, the UAE's president told then-Central Intelligence Agency Director William Burns that "he had spoken to Mr. Netanyahu about a looming threat of violence in the West Bank or the Gaza Strip carried out by Hamas," according to someone familiar with that discussion. The paper's sources were granted anonymity.

The Times' reporting came just days after an Emirati source commented on the Haaretz article. As the Israeli paper detailed:

"UAE discusses security matters with other countries through the relevant entities, and does not discuss such details at the level of national leaders," the source told UAE state-owned newspaper The National. He did not deny that the two leaders spoke, nor did he refute Haaretz's report.

In 2024, the Financial Times reported that The National is owned by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the UAE's vice president and the president's brother. It also reported that the site aligns with the government's position and practices self-censorship on issues deemed sensitive or problematic by the authorities.

Noting that Netanyahu reportedly declined to pass the warning along to his intelligence agencies, investigative journalist Eli Clifton, a co-founder and senior adviser at the US-based Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, asked: "Why? Did he welcome the attack as an opportunity to wage war?"

Mehdi Hasan, who founded the outlet Zeteo, similarly wrote "wonder why" on social media.

Journalist Zaid Jilani declared that "Netanyahu not only has unleashed vicious crimes onto Palestinians, but he failed his own people."

Israel's next parliamentary elections are scheduled for October 27.

Ryan Bohl, a senior Middle East and North Africa analyst at risk intelligence firm RANE, said that it is "as close to an October surprise as one gets in Israel. If I was a betting man, I'd be betting against Netanyahu being next PM."

Reminder that the Trump administration is trying to destroy the ICC in order to protect this man.www.nytimes.com/2026/09/25/w...

[image or embed]
— Brian Finucane (@bcfinucane.bsky.social) September 25, 2026 at 1:02 PM

In a series of decisions seen as signs that Netanyahu and his allies are worried about holding on to power, Israel's Central Elections Committee—which is chaired by a Supreme Court justice but dominated by members of the Knesset's governing coalition—just disqualified all Arab-majority political parties and multiple candidates, while rejecting similar petitions for right-wing parties.

Israel's Supreme Court is set to review those decisions next week, and may overturn some or all of them before the elections.

While Netanyahu's allies on the committee tried to bar potential challengers from running, the prime minister briefly traveled to New York City to speak at the UN General Assembly—despite being the subject of a 2024 International Criminal Court arrest warrant issued over Israel's decimation of Gaza, which human rights groups and scholars have denounced as genocide.

As Netanyahu claimed in his speech that "Israel didn't commit genocide," but rather "prevented genocide," at least hundreds of protesters filled New York's streets and argued that the Israeli leader "needs to be tried in The Hague."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
28 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 42 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Back when this was happening, my initial thought was "no way they didn't knew about this, they're allowing the incursion to start a war"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    He didn't just know, he funded Hamas so they could attack

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago*

    Stop falling for the trap, it's easy enough to avoid.

    1950- "Hey guys, I'm pretty sure that if we attack ____________, there will be repercussions by ____________".

    (repeat every month for 80 years)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Yep. Israli governments have been pushing Palestinian terrorism to further their own narratives/goals for a loooong time now.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    just like NATO prepared the escalation in Ukraine's conflicts, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Don't we already know who funded Hamas in good detail? Like it is not super secret etc. and we need a whistle blower to uncover this. But I guess a genocide is not enough, so decades long support of their enemy must have happened too?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    The warning, though vague, proved to be correct.

    Reading the article, it doesn’t sound like one big conspiracy. The warning was not actionable: “something big is going to happen at some point”, and there were good reasons not to preemptively escalate: not wanting to risk a deal with Saudi Arabia.

    Israels primary crime is not that they let this attack happen, it’s that they committed genocide.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Even if Netanyahu knew the exact method and time, do you think he would have acted to stop it ultimately or allow it to happen and use the attack as an excuse to massively hasten their genocide?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Bullshit. When you're warned of an impending attack you double the people on the street and provide extra security at soft targets. You send out warnings to event organizer, especially a freaking music festival just miles from the border.

  • source
  • parent
  • They weren't just warned, they extended the concert and moved its location so that it would be hit by the October 7th attack they knew was coming.

    It's one of the most blatantly ghoulish acts of a government to sacrifice its own people to manufacture consent to ramp up genocide.

    The fact it took this long for the New York times to admit what we all knew immediately after it happened and what people in the region knew about a week beforehand...

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Israel admitted they killed their own people during October 7 and bumped those death numbers up btw.

    IDF statements
On 18 December the IDF confirmed that Israeli combatants "fell as a result of friendly fire on October 7," but added that "beyond the operational investigations of the events, it would not be morally sound to investigate these incidents due to the immense and complex...

    UN Commission report
A report by a UN Commission published in June 2024 found that the Israel Security Forces used the Hannibal Directive in several instances on October 7. In one example, a tank crew confirmed that they had applied the Hannibal Directive when they shot at a vehicle suspected of carrying kidnapped Israeli soldiers. The report also said that in two instances, Israeli forces "had likely applied the Hannibal Directive," resulting in the killing of at least 14 Israeli civilians.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannibal_Directive#Gaza_war

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
    [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    He was on his way to jail before that attack though...

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    I mean Hamas only existed because Netanyahu and the likud party was propping them up and had been for a long time. Or at least existed in the current form.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    I'll go one further and say nutty yahoo orchestrated an attack on his country in order to precipitate the imperialistic genocide he's unleashed on Palestine and Gaza.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago*

    Let's be honest, there are always vague warnings, and there are always attacks, too. Thousands of missiles, stabbings, shootings, and bombings, attacks are always in the works and being committed by all.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago
    [–] 2 points 1 month ago
    [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    So the NYTimes took some time off from framing hamas for rape to report negative information on netanyahu there, great guys. But they are only doing it because Israel has fallen to 1/3 support in the US. Fuck you, die NYTimes.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I found this 4 year old video and it's really funny with modern day's context

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/_aFaQ-eRuWM

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Well, he saw how good that worked out for the US Gov. after 9/11, so I'm sure it gave him a huuuge erection.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments