all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 21 points 1 month ago (1 child)

i feel so bad for all the people that are terrorized by me riding my bike in my residential neighborhood where they just wanted to take a shortcut in their pristine lifted F-250. i’m sure they took the toolbox off and just got it washed this morning on the way to their office job.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago

    CommieCommuterKazi, more like it.

    Send in the next wave.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    why is the statute of liberty there?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Ham-fisted but accurate.

  • source
  • 55 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 78 points 1 month ago
    [–] 35 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Accurate depiction of drivers in my city

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Where I'm at, they added a "bike lane" on the highway... Which is literally just the shoulder barely wide enough for a cyclist... on a very busy highway that sees lots of trucks and trailers and wide loads, in addition to people travelling at highway speeds. No divider, just a paint line.

    That's not a bike lane, that's an accident about to happen.

    We need real bike lanes, divided by something more than 2 inches of paint, to prevent traffic fatalities.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • God I fucking wish

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    What a hell's up with the kami-computer-kaze dude in the middle of the road?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    This depicts a two lane road with no bike lane.

    The cyclist should actually be in the middle of the lane or even slightly left of middle to avoid motorists trying to squeeze by them in the same lane, like in the comic, which creates a dangerous circumstance for the cyclist, having fast moving vehicles passing inches away.

    It's funny how often you see drivers taking a right turn and they are terrified of scraping their tire on the curb, so they have a several foot gap. But we should trust them to know where the right side of their car is when squeezing past a cyclist? I admit they can see better in that situation, but the risk is all on the cyclist.

    The safest circumstance for the cyclist is if there is a car behind them who is not passing. But most motorists like to go faster than a bicycle.

    The motorist should pass the bicycle in the same way they'd pass any other slower moving vehicle, by using the oncoming lane in a passing zone.

    Of course, that creates its own sort of danger because inattentive drivers may come up onto the bicycle too quickly and then they won't have a place to swerve to at the last moment.

    And all of that is simply about the safety of the cyclist. Obviously, some places will have ridiculous laws that force cyclists into dangerous situations.

    But realistically, with the attitudes and complete lack of driving skills of most drivers, cyclists are taking risks just by using roads like that.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    In Spain drivers are required to leave 1.5m gap when overtaking a cyclist. In my experience 99% of them respect that. It's way more common for them to leave a gap and force the driver going in the other direction to slow down than to pass to close to me. Overall drivers suck here (worst in Spain) but this one rule they do obey.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Same rulein France. 1.5m on rural roads, 1m in town. However, in my experience, about half of drivers overtake with less than a 50cm gap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    In America, I think drivers don't know how to drive around cyclists, so quite a few will drive frighteningly close. I wouldn't care to guess about the percentage.

    But even 1% is a lot of people. A bicycle even on a short trip will be passed by 10s of cars. So, if you bike everywhere, that might be 1 close call a day. So, I'm guessing that Spain is not actually as dangerous as 1% and you were just picking a large number.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I don't think about each time a driver passes me a closer than 1.5m as a "close call". Once I went off the road and fell right into 1.5m deep ditch. Now that was a close call... I still don't know how I didn't hurt myself. I did get fired next day but it was unrelated.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    It's good they're respecting that. We have a similar law in Québec that requires drivers to leave 1,5m when overtaking on a fast road, and 1m in towns and urban environments. It's unfortunately not very respected.

    I can't find the article back but some police forces bought tools to measure that, but they thought it was too dangerous to send police officers on bikes to use that tool and fine the drivers not respecting the law. They just gave up.

    EDIT: Is the police enforcing this in Spain? I'm guessing there are fines?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    EDIT: Is the police enforcing this in Spain? I’m guessing there are fines?

    I ride mostly on secondary roads where you almost never see police so it's pretty much impossible for them to actually see someone breaking this law. No idea if they would stop someone passing dangerously close to a cyclist if they saw it. Honestly, I don't know why most drivers respect this rule. They don't care that much about other rules.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -28 points 1 month ago (23 children)
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Around here bike people:

    Die because of distracted drivers.

    Die because Trucks can't bother to properly check all their mirrors.

    Die because drivers speeding.

    I think bikes would be way better if you wouldn't risk getting killed by drivers any time you do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago*

    Shit, I once had someone tell me with a straight face that it's not a trucker's fault if they run over cyclists when turning around corners. Not because of dead angles but because they can't be expected to check their mirror every time they make a turn; they're too busy fiddling with their GPS and getting the freight papers sorted.

    While making turns. Apparently they're too busy to do that when the vehicle's stopped or at the very least while they're driving straight and thus they should be exempt from having to obey traffic rules.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago

    I don't doubt you've seen those things, but you seem to be implying a) it's not just a small minority and b) when bikes do those things, they're just as dangerous as any bad driver. Neither of which are true.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    Ignore mandatory dismount locations

    When cars were new, Wisconsin law required a flagman to walk ahead of the vehicle as it traveled, to warn other people and ensure that the way was clear. I'd love to see that return, in analogous locations. That is, a passenger has to get out and walk the car through.

    I wouldn't expect drivers to follow that law, because you can barely count on them to follow any traffic laws, but still.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 31 points 1 month ago* (8 children)

    As opposed to drivers, who never do any of those things, I'm sure.

    Also

    Go over the speed limit.

    What

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -19 points 1 month ago (7 children)
  • [–] [M] 22 points 1 month ago* (6 children)

    Vehicles that can go 60 MPH are motorcycles, not e-bikes. If you repeat that false claim it will be considered misinformation and removed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If a vehicle goes over 25 kph in Germany it's a moped. You need a drivers license, insurance and registration. So, many imported E-bikes legally require moped rules, but all too few follow it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    If I remember correctly, in the US an ebike must be limited to 28mph, anything faster requires a driver's license with a motorcycle endorsement, or in some states a scooter endorsement

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -5 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    A lot of laws have been passed to limit bike speeds at this point, what are you talking about?

    Ebikes aren't a new technology anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] [M] 11 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    If you don't know my local laws, you can't claim I am spreading misinformation.

    If you wanted me to believe you based on your local laws, you should've cited them (or at least told us the jurisdiction you're talking about).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)
  • [–] [M] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Misinformation conflating illegal unlicensed e-motocycles is a huge problem that is resulting in legal e-bikes getting unfairly blamed and sometimes even confiscated and destroyed. This community will not contribute to it.

    You can either accept that, have a conversation about how the specific jurisdiction you're talking about is behind the curve on regulation so that we can productively discuss ways to help fix the problem in that jurisdiction (because that's a different problem than other places have with existing rules not getting enforced correctly), or leave. In no scenario will you be allowed to use this community to spread FUD and lies.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    I always try to be responsible and cautious when riding a bike. The thing is, often the road layout is so hostile to cyclists, there is just no way to follow the rules and be safe. Having said that, of course traffic rules should also be enforced on cyclists and some people are just irredeemable idiots. But the main problems are bad cycling infrastructure and inconsiderate or distracted drivers. I'd rather have the irredeemable idiots ride a bike than drive a three ton truck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    And in Alberta, car people:

    Drive the wrong way into incoming traffic in the middle of the road.

    Ignore all stoplights.

    Ignore traffic lights.

    Go over the speed limit.

    Drive on the sidewalk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    Don't even get me started on truck people!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    There are plenty of places where you're allowed to bike on the sidewalks especially because biking on highways is illegal in the states

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Biking on sidewalks is perfectly legal where I’m at, the only exception I can think of is when the sidewalk abuts a building, and usually where that occurs I’m mostly comfortable with on road biking

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -19 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    That seems like a lot of effort to draw a man made of straw

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I see you're unfamiliar with Kelly's work

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I am, do they only draw comics from personal experience or something? I don't agree with the guy above btw, just curious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    As others said, he does cartoons for the Onion. They're always ridiculous right wing parodies. If you've seen a meme with a guy wearing a shirt labeled "Sickos" saying "Ha ha ha, yes", that's one of his. Tyrannical cyclists are a frequent subject

    Edit: this one

  • source
  • parent