top 90 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 127 points 1 month ago (19 children)

The Knight First Amendment Institute argued as amicus that searching expressive and associational content on phones demands a First Amendment warrant. The Second Circuit rejected that argument, holding that neither the Fourth nor the First Amendment carves out a special exemption for phones at the border.

Wow. Yeah... We all need shitty travel phones with very little on them now. That's fucking gross.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The Second Circuit rejected that argument, holding that neither the Fourth nor the First Amendment carves out a special exemption for phones at the border.

    The second circuit used the right argument but somehow came to the wrong conclusion. The 4th carves out no special exemption, meaning you need a warrant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Or don't travel with a phone at all. Take a digital camera and use that for pictures.

    Anything else, just buy a used phone at your destination and load all your accounts on that, then delete and reset your phone and sell it before you leave

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    You realize these powers extend within 100 miles of any border?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Doesn't it also include international airports and waterways?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Take a digital camera and use that for pictures.

    They'll search that too! Take an analog camera instead. At least that way you get the film developed for free ;).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 81 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    Looks like it's time to carry a dummy phone with you if you decide to visit the US. Not really sure why any non-citizens would want to do that at this point though.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Interestingly, iOS 27 has a new “2 phones can share 1 number and you can swap between them” which didn’t seem to make a lot of sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    What in the what now? Just between apple phones or with android or other OS? Guess I hafta go read…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/iphone-handoff-one-number-two-phones/

    But The Apple documentation (https://support.apple.com/en-us/127274) mentions that your iCloud gets synced between both devices, so now I’m confused what the purpose of this is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Dang, I had other ideas!

    What you need:

    Two devices running iOS 27 or later that are: Connected to Wi-Fi Sharing the same Apple Account Using Messages in iCloud to ensure messages sync Signed into FaceTime and iMessage with the same Apple Account An eSIM from a carrier that supports iPhone Handoff: USA: T-Mobile Germany: Telekom

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    it makes sense in the backdoor sense. esims. so now uncle sam can “be” that 2nd phone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    I'm not even sure why would they even need to see your phone.
    All these idiots use cloud, just requesting data from iOS/google is sufficient in most cases. I think they don't even have to ask, they gotta have direct api access.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 1 month ago

    Fuck ICE and fuck CBP.

  • source
  • [–] 74 points 1 month ago (17 children)

    Remember to turn off all biometrics for unlocking your phone, if not now, then at least when traveling internationally. They can scan your face or your fingerprint without a warrant. But they can't compel you to provide potentially incriminating information including passwords, codes and patterns. Self-destruct codes will likely get you arrested for obstruction of justice and destruction of evidence though, so use those at your own risk. I wouldn't recommend it.

    Best to never keep anything you wouldn't want a cop or fed seeing anywhere on your device. If you have any materials that you wish to keep private, store them elsewhere as much as possible. Either never store them on your device or regularly back them up somewhere secure and wipe your device clean. Make sure all remote access to those materials are behind secure encrypted password protected connections.

    Remember, know the law so that you may follow it to its letter and no further. If you must comply, comply. If you can, don't comply. Know your rights and practice them. Never volunteer information to law enforcement even if you're innocent. You don't know what they know, what they are wanting to hear, what can be misunderstood, confused or contorted to put you into trouble. Every day is shut the fuck up Friday. Nobody will protect you but you.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Refusing to unlock your properly secured device for them will result in its confiscation and perhaps your detention.

    Password managers and browser history are sticking points. You could not use your device for anything, but one of your services might rat you out.

    You kinda need a travel phone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    If you're a us citizen, they cannot detain you indefinitely. What that means isn't legally defined yet, but seems to be around 4 - 8 hours.

    Edit: apparently no longer true.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    CPB statement

    OFO may hold U.S. citizens in custody in certain situations, such as suspicion of or a determination of violating U.S. law, pending transfer to another law enforcement agency on an extraditable warrant, or if accompanying a family member being processed for appropriate immigration proceedings. Available data indicate that OFO held U.S. citizens longer than 24 hours on 562 occasions from October 1, 2019, through April 30, 2021.

    And that's 2021 before things started getting hot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Or just don't travel to North Korea, because we are talking about the fascist dictatorship of North Korea, right? No western democracy would do this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    My pin is eleven digits, a number I'll never forget, and I enter it every time. No face ID for me.

    Also, don't call the cops unless getting arrested is better than whatever is happening. Because, they'll use any excuse to arrest you no matter how innocent you think you are.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    wipe your device clean

    This will be seen as a red flag and get you a few nights-weeks stay in the Gulag.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I don't mean wipe your device of all data. I mean wipe any of your sensitive data. Keep your texts to friends, photos of your daughter, apps and stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    My institution has a travel warning to the US.

    We cannot cross the border by car, only in airports.

    We cannot travel without a phone, with a burner, or with a wiped phone. We have to memorize our lawyer's number when we are detained. We are told we have no rights and have to comply to any request, this means bend over. Fuck that. No more US travel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I don't know how a self-destruct code will work, but if you have password A get into profile A, while password B gets you into a plausibly looking and normal profile B while profile A and password A get deleted, then you can claim your phone was always and ever the way profile B shows it. It doesn't look or feel "destroyed." It's just a normal profile with mundane messages, browsing history, contact list that makes sense, etc.

    Good luck proving that anything fishy happened when the whole operation looks and feels like unlocking a normal phone.

    You can even setup biometric login to be password B. So if someone gets into your phone with a fingerprint, which feels very normal, they see a normal boring and completely plausible profile.

    There is absolutely a way to make phones secure if there is enough will.

    That said, it's a political problem that's begging for a political rather than a tech solution.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The pic shows that tiny little guy with the big nazi coat. I thought the tiny little guy with the big nazi coat got fired.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    As a us citiczen I’m more and more looking at my phone as a hostile device. I have Graphene on one phone and an iPhone, but with how things are going these days who knows how secure these devices really are. Apple iOS is a black box. Android is not much better, and they’re now faster than laptops and most desktops. They can be running and recording and reporting anything and still sip battery life. I’ve since deleted social media apps outside of lemmy and HN. I use my little e-reader more than my phone. All my personal stuff is in encrypted cloud that is not iCloud, I don’t use biometrics to unlock it. But I still don’t trust it. I’m beginning to think carrying it in a foil bag until I need it is a good idea.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    I agree, it's not a tool, it's a compromised and dangerous device and I have to carry it with me carefully. I have always turned off my location from time to time and carefully managed permissions, but nowadays here's what I do:

    • Graphene
    • no biometric login
    • no stale data on the device. If I won't need it while I am mobile, does it need to be on my phone?
    • location off, BT off, and airplane mode when going into grocery stores or any surveillance a happy retailer.
    • factory wipe or alternate phone before traveling internationally, especially to countries with questionable rule of law, including my own
    • minimal non-FOSS apps (getting less every time I redo the phone)
    • any app that has a usable web portal or can be accessed on desktop only (Facebook, reddit) does not get installed.
    • no pairing with cars or other BT devices that are known to be sketchy.

    If I controlled the software on a deeper level, I would set it up to have a toggle where it will only connect to the cell network every 30-60 minutes. There is little in my life that is more important than a half hour response time, so why am I continuously broadcasting my triangulated location? I would have that toggle turned on 90% of the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    This will really fix that lost tourism problem.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I don't get it

    Also, is this a new sfm video? Is he posting new ones? I don't recognize it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    To all of you yanks, you should start rethinking your anthem, land of the free my ass

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    This is what happens when you allow conservatives (fascists) to have control.

    This is why it is your responsibility (duty) to do whatever is most likely to prevent that from happening.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Ok, so not entering the country i will.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    When traveling, carry a flip phone and a digital camera.

    Got it.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Is this part of their tourism strategy?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I believe they are hunting tourist and working on the commercialization thereof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Are those directing ICE also involved in human trafficking?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    This is nothing new. I don't agree with it but people are acting like this was rolled out yesterday. Unless we can reverse the supreme court ruling on it, nothing will prevent them from searching phones at airports or within 100 of borders.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    This ruling was specific to people entering the country, if you aren't entering the country they need a warrant still.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Yeah that makes sense. Wasn't this the status quo anyway?

    Just upload an encrypted tarball to a cloud service and retrieve it afterwards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Yeah I should have added that they need a warrant IF you use a passcode. If you use biometrics they may fall into loopholes that they can search it. Essentially they pretty much own your body when arrested, but not your thoughts. So they can't make you turn over the code without a warrant. Aka if you are going to get arrested turn off your phone. It makes complete sense that you would want to have battery when you got out of jail 8 hours later or I guess longer if they actually had a charge to pin on you. "Why did you turn off your phone" "to make sure I could call someone to pick me up after I get out or call a cab service"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    It would be so easy for me to laugh this off and say, "duh just don't go to the third world country that is the USA," but anything they do will spread to other parts of the world.

    Maybe wipe an old phone and just have signal to communicate with family until I cross the border? I wouldn't even mind paying a few bucks to make a new signal account without a phone number.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    If I’m going down for a meme then you can bet your ass I’ll be doing my best to sink my teeth into some throats like I’m Rick fuckin’ Grimes as soon as my phone is taken. In for a penny in for a pound.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    I always hit "Factory Data Reset" before crossing a border, but now they aren't just at (or nenar) borders.

    Time to keep any data on a server, in a jurisdiction that tells the MAGAt motherfuckers where to stuff it.

    Sadly hard to find a commercial service. Sync is in Canada, and they're a compelte joke now that Carney is ruining the place. Tuta is in Germany, and they have AfD running a new Nazi takeover one chunk at a time. Proton is Switzerland which is good... For Citizens. Most of us aren't Swiss, though.

    Honestly we need someone to make a service like Proton, and put it in Iceland...

    Which will be good, until that fuckwit Cheeto mistakes it for Greenland and invades.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Encrypt all your remote hosted stuff!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Not if I never travel to that shithole country again.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    6 comments in c/technology@beehaw.org view that post