PS: The point here is NOT that poor people shouldn't have kids, it's that no one should be having kids without having the basics of childcare covered, which necessitates widespread systemic, societal, and economic change so that no parent needs to worry about those basics, and kids can grow up in secure, healthy environments. I completely forgot to mention this when I originally posted it, and that's my bad.

top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 37 points 1 month ago

Which is why child welfare is so important

  • source
  • [–] 59 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    This discussion is hard and society is still not ready for it.

    There are absolutely a lot of people that should not be bringing children into this world.

    If as a society we're going to say "it's a fundamental right to breed", then we need to fucking fix society so that every child brought into this world is guaranteed the opportunity for success. That means universal public healthcare, universal public education through college, universal access to nutrition...just to start.

    Our current system is nothing like that. Once a kid is born today, if their parents suck then they're just fucked, and maybe that kid should have tried being born to better parents.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    In a system designed to opress, and only function on oppression, is it really the parents fault for being trapped in said oppression? And I wouldn't even fault them for choosing to have a child atm, because that's mostly been removed as a choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I would.

    If you willingly make someone suffer through a system you know will oppress them, that's abuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Civilised countries have solved this problem. If you're in a position to think this way then your government is actively oppressing the poor.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Well the main reason you shouldn't have kids is because this world is going down to shit at an accelerating pace.

    Between climate collapse, life extinction, resources exhaustion and AI dystopia, where do you see your kids in 20, 30, 40 years? Dead from starvation? Enslaved by oligarchs? Can you see a good life fort them in the horizon?

    My kid is a teenager and I already feel like she's living the best of their life already. From their adult life, I can only see it go down.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Personally, I think future generations are fine as long as they apply themselves and hobby hop and as long as we reinforce and appreciate the tenacity behind their hobby hopping.

    When I was growing up there was no 3D printing, you weren't able to just make a dropshipping hobby and advertise on youtube like it was fucking nothing, I think twitch was just becoming a thing but the amount of money and influencers wasn't like it is now, hell influencers weren't a thing. It also looks like people adapt easily in today's world. I'm not worried about anything, they all have their adaptations and ways of doing their lives and that's fine.

    I think it's good to leave a door of hope open for the next generations.

    But as I've always said: What could get worse, can always get better. 😀

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    There's a reason why wild animals frequently don't reproduce in captivity.

    Humans don't tend to do it very well either.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Thinking about childrens' futures breaks my heart

  • source
  • [–] 93 points 1 month ago (37 children)

    This is far too much "breeding is a privilege for the rich" for my tastes. Touch too much Eugenics.

    "Just don't have kids" is a horrible solution.

    "fix the system so people can make their own choices about having kids" is the actual solution.

  • source
  • hideshow 37 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    Thats the point of the post. The user calling out "selfish is doing too much work" is saying that its not the individual who is to blame, its society.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    if you look at destructdisc’s post history that is definitely not the point. they are a childfree instagram edgelord hot take monger.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Not the lemmy user, the actual image they posted. That phrase is in the graphic. Seems like the lemmy user didnt actually understand the image they posted then, but i dont follow users like that, im just looking at this one post

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (8 children)

    lol ‘don’t have kids you can’t afford’

    what a hot take

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

    Yes, it is a hot take. At best, it's capitalist victim blaming, and at worst it's social darwinism.

    You are blaming poor people for wanting a family when it should be a basic right for those who want it. We as a society should be ensuring our children are taken care of with healthcare, nutrition, education, etc.

    To be clear, I am 100% child free myself, but I acknowledge that we collectively need kids from all backgrounds for a healthy society to persist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I mean, yes but... at the same time the people that already have kids that are insufficiently fed /housed mayyyybe shouldn't be shooting for #5 and #6 etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    sure, you can cherrypick extreme examples of any human behvavior to get angry at.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    It's not that extreme, and I mainly just it as an example because it's something I've seen often enough for a variety of reasons (religion, Gov't cheques, etc).

    That said, stuff like Elon and his quest to artificially impregnate at many women as possible with his progeny is just as messed up.

    For those of us that aren't crazy rich arseholes, having one's first kid is often a trade off between an age when financial security is more likely, of prime birth/parenting years when one has a lower chance of complications/defects/etc, and then the issue of age gap between offspring after.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Yes, it is a hot take. At best, it's capitalist victim blaming, and at worst it's social darwinism

    it’s not a hot take to admit we physically cannot support the current human population much less continue to grow

    You are blaming poor people for wanting a family when it should be a basic right for those who want it. We as a society should be ensuring our children are taken care of with healthcare, nutrition, education, etc.

    don’t put words in my mouth

    my personal stance is in agreement with you and an actual first world community that valued children would help those willing to have them afford to do so

    i just don’t think parenthood should be winged otherwise, it only harms the child

    To be clear, I am 100% child free myself, but I acknowledge that we collectively need kids from all backgrounds for a healthy society to persist.

    sure but until we put money into that all we do is create suffering

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I mean, yeah, I agree. A kid should be one of the most serious choices a human can make. And the ability to safely make that choice (especially the choice to skip it) should be our civilization's clearest priority. The fact that it's treated with such utilitarian callousness by the billionaire class is unequivocally sociopathic.

    Like... fuck, being a parent is hard work. The right to take a step back and give it some thought and prep is just a no-brainer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    It isn’t, my wife and I regularly say “have the kids you can afford”.

    I don’t own a boat I can’t fix, a house I can fix, a car I can’t fix. Why then would it be okay to have a baby I can’t feed.

    Point fingers at the system, sure. But that still doesn’t fix the issue that it’s a bad faith decision to “figure it out”.

    I know what that means, cheap Walmart food and childhood obesity. Setting young people up for failure. Meanwhile parents not contributing to their retirements for 10+ years with the plan being my kid will take care of me! Lmao no.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    What's simpler

    • Just don't have kids and cope with the face that it's not the best solution

    • fix the system

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago

    The real solution is acrually this:

    • Dont have kids because you must cope with the fact that the majority of humanity is OK with this stupid , inhuman system THATS why most humans have not risen up substantially to change the system.

    Youre welcome 😁

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    The rich want poor to have kids so they have more chattel. I don't think it's eugenics at all, the rich wouldn't know what to do with fewer wage slaves.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Skip having kids, even if you want to, just to own the rich? 🤔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (6 children)

    well ya.

    If I told you that I was gonna hire a politican or group of politicans to 'Epstein' and rob your child every day that they worked for me(YES even after theyve become an adult) .... why in the fuck would you have that child?!

    THATS literally the world we live in today.

    AND also better yet , after Ive 'Epsteined' them and robbed them...I can just blow them up instead if I feel like it! We see thst happening with abandon all over Colombia , The Congo, Sudan, PAlestine , Lebanon, Iram, Yemen, Syria, etc... (theblist is almost endless)

    AND better yet, after Ive done all those horrible tjings to them , how about I also destroy their life and livelihoods with climate change. Ill be fine in my multipurpose military yacht or my spaceship or my militarized mansion on the mountains . The IPCC has already confirmed that even if we stop using GHGs as I type tjis we shall live im an nearly. apocalyptic world for the next 50-200 years!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

    Okay... But there's so much more to life than that.

    People work jobs they enjoy, have relationships, have experiences and generally love living.

    To arbitrarily deny someone existence because of a shadow focused view of the world or an imagined joyless experience is at best pessimistic and at worst a projection of the parents fears onto the imaginary child.

    I shouldn't exist. Due to medical complications during pregnancy my mother was advised to abort me. She gave birth to me and instead raised me badly 🤣

    I'm glad that's the way it happened. Life is hard sometimes but it's also wonderful a lot of the time.

    The issues you name are real, as real as the joys and pleasures of existence.

    There's a reason even mad Max fights to survive. Because even that world is better than not existing. If he wasn't born, he doesn't get to make that choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    OK it was JOYFUL for YOU

    YOU can go on with your life and be joyful with YOUR joyful life. Have fun buddy I guess 🤷🏿‍♂️

    As for me? Ive been robbed, shot at, socially isolated due to the color of my skin and my poorness , left broke even after working long hours, and other awful things that have made me very bitter , and very VERY deranged. A person like me cannot be happy in a world like what we have created today and bbecause Im not happy I feel that my child will also be as unhappy as I am(and seeing as how I am actually surprisingly poorer than my parents ? Im pretty fucking sure that Im fucking right)

    Also knowing how idiotic I am? I cannot guarantee that child will be alive by the time theyre an adult . I have done many stupid things that havve almost granted me a Darwin Award.... So what would happen to my child if they accompanied me on those things?

    And there are people all over the planet just like me ... And youre tellling us tto put a child under our care?...

    So YES I am clearly justified in denying my aethereal child from suffering all the BS I have suffered or that they could suffer under my care. And also denying my aethereal children from suffering of all the awful shit I have read of on the news.

    Also its been shown that unhappy people like me tend to not have children anyways : https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5505668/

    ....Also ....mad max is a fucking movie....it doesnt apply to real life....wot?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    long as you fix the system before having the kids i ageee

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Kinda wild to go on a childfree forum and be surprised people primarily talk about not having kids for various reasons.

    And yes, being unable to afford them is a good reason to not have kids. Yes, eugenics also targets the poor. A broken clock is right twice a day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Im never having kids because I cant afford them, sure, but that doesn't mean you ought to have to pay to live, if the world were different I'd have children in a heartbeat

    the op argument is a pathway to eugenics, child removal, and punishing people for living

    also the doctor who did my vasectomy literally said if you have kids, you tend to figure it out as he completed the procedure lol

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Yep families have figured it out since the beginning of time. Unlike the younger people today who think anyone born before them had life handed to them. Throughout history most people have lived subsistence lives.

  • source
  • parent
  • States: Horrible news! People are not having kids anymore!!!!

    Also states: We're cutting the daycare bonus and won't address the house prices or wages so both of you have to work full-time just so you can pay rent/mortgage.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    The issue here is that in a proper society, child care is a societal burden and not just a personal one. Meaning that in a proper society, both the rich and the poor can raise children properly and not let the child suffer.

    Imagine a society where only the rich reproduce... That is arguably just as fucked up just in a different way.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    "in a proper society".

    Well there's your problem...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago

    Ever notice these conversations always center around the poor. Articles and comments never scold the rich for not providing loving or mentally and emotionally healthy environments for their children. They can produce little affluent sociopaths all day every day and it's cool because they have money. As long as they aren't actively and visibly abusive to their children they'll never lose custody (and sometimes not even then). But the poor regularly have their kids taken for not having enough resources while we tisk tisk them for the crime of not being born privileged.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Well poor people should NOT have kids, because kids are not a good that you have to suit your needs.

    Growing up poor stunts you severely. Make a good nest egg first.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    So the most selfish thing that people can do... is only available to the impoverished?

    The most selfish thing that the system can do is let children live in poverty.

    Fuck this billionaire bootlicking bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Stating that it's fucked up to bring a child into this world that you cannot materially provide for is not billionaire boot licking bullshit. I'm guessing you're one of the poor people that's having kids that you can't materially provide for or you wouldn't be taking it so personally. If you cannot materially provide for your children you're an unfit parent. Why are you advocating for unfit parents to have children? Why do you want children to suffer?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    PS: The point here is NOT that poor people shouldn't have kids,

    You may not think that's the point, but that is the ultimate effect of your words.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I'd see it more like "Poor people shouldn't exist".

    But as in "We need a society where nobody is considered poor and everybody is provided for"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • No, this interpretation is too convenient for them.

    Stop creating lives you're knowingly unprepared to provide for.

    This is a personal indictment, not a systemic one. It specifically treats births as the problem, not wages.

    I do not have children, nor do I plan to—I have way too many video games to play. However, I am not so stupidly suicidal as to suggest that it is morally superior of me to be a zoo panda—or to pretend that it is global warming stopping me from participating in the same desperate struggle for life that my great ancestors did when driving their feet through mud and soil to chase antelope.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    No I understand it. Thinking further than yourself and thinking that government assistance and family will help you out. Diapers and formula are expensive. School, school supplies. The clothes they need as they grow, the food they're gonna need, the potential therapies that may be needed. Doctors appointments that sometimes insurance doesn't cover. Then you might have a child born with an incurable disease that you might give your whole financial being trying to treat.

    The amount of emotional availability that's needed, the patience and god forbid they die!!!! Plus it's a lifetime thing it never ends they don't turn 21 and leave you forever it's a forever thing. If you're still in contact with your parents, how many people are in their mid 30's who are still on good terms with their parents? Who do you still call or go to when all goes to shit?

    Like fuck man!!!!

    No I will not attempt to provide a life to something. Hell I can hardly afford myself. If I could provide financial reliability and if I wasn't in the living situation I'm in now, maybe but even still, I don't have that emotional expenditure and I know I'm not meant to raise a human and I'm okay with that.

    I like being able to do whatever I want whenever I want, spending money on myself and I am a very detached person sometimes..... I wouldn't ever want to create an offspring only to know the life I would be able to provide isn't of sufficient quality.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (19 children)

    "Poor people should go extinct"

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    I mean considering the alternative is they don’t have access to food, housing, healthcare, and are essentially forced by circumstance to either become criminals or throw themselves into the meat grinder.

    Now I don’t even like arguing this anymore since reproductive rights in my neck of the woods have gone away, but you can’t seriously think that giving a kid a miserable, painful life is better than not having a kid at all

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    I can, actually. Mostly because even growing up in poverty is rarely just a "miserable, painful life" even somewhere like Burkina Faso but also because collectively providing for the next generation is a thing that we should be constantly pushing for, culturally and publicly. Because without a future there is nothing to fight for, without youth there is nobody to care for the old, without fresh eyes there is no passion for change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (6 children)

    I can’t help it. I’m glad to be infertile. Children born right now would inevitably face the extreme results of a climate crisis, depleting fresh water stores, the global sociopolitical breakdown currently happening in favor of far right fascists funded by billionaires, and everything that comes with that.

    I feel we are past the point of no return and am confident that I will probably die before the absolute worst of it, but my generation’s children would not. I have never been more afraid for children in my life, and there are many in my own little village. I just do not and cannot foresee a future where this gets better, with as powerless as we are against surveillance and military technology. As nihilistic as it sounds, we are speedrunning extinction and the guard rails are gone. I do not want to see children suffer for it, and especially not my own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

    If you truly believed that everything can only get worse from here I don't know why you're still here, frankly.

    Edit: I'll elaborate. You will die before the worst of it. We all will. I went to school for ecology, I know how grim things are. Worsening climate crises are going to push desperate people out of increasingly hot and arid regions into places with more fresh water and that will cause terrible conflicts. We're driving a mass extinction event that's making the leaderboards. (I don't think we're hitting K-T numbers without nuclear war but it's gonna be bad.)

    But we also, as a species, bounced back from a 98% population loss that lasted a hundred thousand years. And that was Stone Age technology. I have the utmost faith in our adaptability and I'm pretty confident humanity will survive our own bullshit. Further, I don't think morality enters into it. Life is amoral. Existence is amoral. The ability to contemplate the nature of existence does not elevate us above that amorality. So I'm not throwing in the towel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

    Whew that’s a windy way to tell me to kill myself huh, and to your elaboration: someone else’s kids can get knocked back to the Stone Age to repopulate the earth if we’re as like cockroaches as you believe. Not mine though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    No like why are you here, why bother with society if it's doomed and miserable? Why make connections that will amount to nothing? Why not live as a hermit or descend into unbridled hedonism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    You mean why am I here if I’m not going to shit out babies and force them into an impossible situation? Why are you here asking fucking moronic questions when the community is labeled childfree? We all make choices

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    The community could be a place for people to find validation for choosing not to have children in a culture that's still largely hetero-normative and pressures young people to get married and have kids. It could even be a place for DINKs to jerk each other off about the cool shit they have money for instead of children. It sucks that it's mostly full of doomer anti-natalists and soft-genocide ecofascists. Y'all need therapy and antidepressants.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Have you considered that DINK and non traditional families also have multiple motivations and are multi-faceted individuals? I would never condemn anyone for having children but I am sad for children being given a bad life they didn’t choose by parents who knew better. I’m more of the mind that should I want children, I will probably end up adopting or fostering one day, but I am not compelled to breed or to spread some bloodline legacy when there are more than enough unloved and suffering children in the world — but even then I have qualms with the ethical implications of a society that takes children from poor families it refuses to provide for and pays others to raise (however poorly) those same kids whose mothers were deemed undeserving of that same social welfare.

    You call me a doomer and anti-natalist, but you agree with how shitty everything is so what’s the issue? That I’m realistic about it and not relentlessly optimistic that life will find a way so I should just cheer up about it? Is it anti-natalist to believe we have a resources and population issue and that declining birth rates, however bad for an economy, can only be a longer term boon for the sum total of our species’ destructive capability? I don’t hate children, but I don’t feel qualified to make a better world for them and that grieves me. People are supposed to want their children to prosper, to live a better life, and if I can’t imagine that possibility, my personal ethos is that I shouldn’t create a living being that gets to watch what’s coming play out.

    I am depressed. It’s depressing. Everyone is depressed. Therapy only does so much, but my problems are only internal insofar as I choose to look at the world without blinding myself to very real problems. Sure, I could chipper up if I choose to be ignorant and delusional about everything, but that’s not who I am and never has been. Whatever soft-genocide or economically-driven eugenics you think I support because I am fearful for the poor and what their children will suffer, since they will always suffer the most, I can tell you that I would rather these marginalized groups had access to thorough sex education and safe birth control options because historically it has only helped those communities, both economically and socially. If you disagree with that despite factual evidence in cases like quantifiable improvements in marginalized communities a generation after Roe v Wade was decided, then you ignore reality to create an enemy that doesn’t exist, while trivializing real issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    It's not someone else's responsibility to provide a reason for you to fight / live, care for you when you're old, or help you change things you don't like. None of those things benefits the kid being born.

    Having kids is morally wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    It’s not someone else’s responsibility to provide a reason for you to fight / live, care for you when you’re old, or help you change things you don’t like.

    It's called society, the thing we all live in that only works because of collective will and effort.

    None of those things benefits the kid being born.

    Giving up now is worse for them.

    Having kids is morally wrong.

    Morality has nothing to do with it. Not a single atom in the universe consented to its own existence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    I feel like I just need to reflect on this for a while to figure out where everyone else is coming from. I really wish I could understand people who think this way. I'm the one with the unpopular opinion and I'm just amazed. Pretty sure most people in my town would be offended if they knew what I thought about having kids.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Unironically, yes. So should rich people. If we do that one first we can do the other one pretty easily.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I don't think poor people should have kids because I don't think anyone should have kids because all humans should just agree that this shit sucks, and then throw a massive global rager until the world runs out of drugs and booze and then we should blow up the planet and be done with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I think community is missing. You can provide material things and the child still be neglected.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Grew up poor. Still happy to be born. Parents grew up in even worse conditions in their old country during and after a war. Pretty sure they're okay with having been born.

    You can choose to not have kids for whatever reason. You don't need to justify it or rationalize it.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    This was a better point (in the US) before Roe v Wade got overturned honestly

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›