top 54 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It was something like 70% of all malware originates from the google play store. Yet to make you safe you can't download apps outside of google play.

Lol.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 1 month ago

    Enshitification intensifies

  • source
  • [–] 61 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Its a shit process. If they'd just get rid of the 24h countdown it be bearable. But thats exactly the tactic, isn't it, make it as shitty as you can, then you dial it back just a notch so people feel like that is better, even though it is still worse than the original process.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Does changing your system time work?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    No. It likely looks for external timekeeping from a carrier.

    It also only gives you a 1 hour window when the 24 are done to turn on sideloading. So set an alarm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    That one hour window did me in and had to wait another 24. The option is nearly impossible to find, there is no notification when the timer has completed, and there is no indication that you only have an hour ahead of time. I think this qualifies as the option not existing for the average person, even when told about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 77 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Android is becoming garbage.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    Yeah Lets hope linux phones pick up speed because of this. Having a fully free and open os for mobile would be great but I fear it is still a few years away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 1 month ago

    It's rapidly getting better.

    What we need are phones with hardware that has full mainline kernel support. That way distros would just have to ship a dwvice tree file if that is not upstream yet, not a completely custom kernel with hundreds of patches that becomes trash shortly after buying due to lack of updates.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Happy lemmy anniversary, its always lovely to see you around sunshine :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 month ago

    Its just Linux too. This is a very stupid thing and will only accelerate true linux phones becoming popular.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    I was wondering when this would come. Even popped open DuckDuckGo and searched for Android news, yet this completely escaped the radar.

    I've already removed the verifier and safetycore apps and installed stubs in their place. I also already had Shizuko and now I have gained root access on top of it without unlocking the bootloader.

    Google may fuck themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Is this a good solution doing what you describe? I might need to try it on my wife's Pixel 9 w/stock OS.

    https://github.com/slopgirl/android-safety-stubs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago*

    I have not used this particular repo but from what I read, it does what it should be doing, replace the real hidden apps with placeholder stubs that have version 2000000 or something to that effect. You should be good with this one. Make sure to read all of the readme carefully, particularly the uninstall methods.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    If you are going this far why not Graphene or CalyxOS? Genuine interest...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Because I have access to neither on my Xiaomi phone. I do have access to other custom ROMs though but unlocking the bootloader will wipe my data. As soon as I'm ready, I'm considering LineageOS or any of the other available ROMs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    that's why i installed graphene on my phone and turned off updates on my tablet so i'm still on android 15

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago* (8 children)

    Google installs the module silently in the background automatically if you have Play Services, it is not related to your OS version. It can be removed with adb, or in some cases disabled

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    IIRC Graphene has Play Services sandboxed specifically to avoid stuff like that but I'm still learning about how it all works slowly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    How is this legal? Serious question, how can it be legal for a company to dictate what I install on my own computing devices?

    Dobtngive me the security crap, that is just a cheap excuse

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    Shit like this is why I run lineage OS and there's a very good chance that my next phone is going to be running post-market OS and not Android at all.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Google would rather block potential competition than attempt to fix their own product.

    • The Playstore is inundated with fake reviews and paid for discoveribility, pushing awful predatory apps to the top.
    • Many (I assume, it was several from my small collection) niche clean apps left the play store after increased requirements proved not worth the hassle for the small Devs.
    • Lots of people report issues with Google Play cards.
    • Lots of people report being billed for things that they did not consent to.
    • Google Play support appears to be useless.
    • https://www.trustpilot.com/review/www.gplaynews.com

    So the Playstore sucks and it burns too many of their potential customers, resulting in churn instead of retention. Consequently it has seen very little growth since Covid: https://www.businessofapps.com/data/google-play-statistics/ . The potential for growth was there though, as can be seen with the apple app store: https://www.businessofapps.com/data/apple-app-store-statistics/

    And as a cherry on top, Google has recently started billing cc chargeback fees to developers. I don't know a single other large digital shop platform that does this. More costs and more administration for Devs, which will make the Playstore even less attractive for hobby Devs with a niche passion project.

  • source
  • [+] -13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Anybody who has an opinion about these things and doesn't just accept everything Big Tech throws at them saw (something like this) developing for years, nay decades, and had plenty of time to move on. So who exactly "hates it" now? I suspect it's the typical Android App developer who always has one eye on monetization and is therefore willing to accept a lot of shit from the OS they're devleoping for until it affects them directly.

    Not that I don't agree with them.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    and had plenty of time to move on

    Sorry, do you mean developers or users, and where exactly do you think one can move to? IPhones? GrapheneOS is still restricted to Pixels and while the Motorolla collab is starting up they already announced that they start with flagship type phones, meaning expensive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -27 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    once you’ve waited 24 hours, you can choose to allow sideloading for seven days or indefinitely.

    I know I'm going against the current here, but I don't think this is a bad change at all. It's a step to protect normies from themselves who, despite how inconceivable it is to fall for this kind of scam, are actually even dumber than that.

    I do think it's reasonable to be worried about future changes that further restrict sideloading. It's often how these restrictions are slowly implemented. But where it's at now with this change in particular I'm cool with.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Normies keep falling for scams all the time. They fall for scam on windows, over the phone and in person. We generally try to come up with rules that protect normies without overly complicating lives for everyone else. Like I have to go to a bank personally to increase single transaction limit over certain amount but I don't have unlock some secret options and wait 24 hours every time I want to wire money to a new account.

    A warning saying "this app is not trusted, don't install it if someone else instructed you to do so" would be enough here. Advanced users should be able to disable this warning. That's it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago

    I don’t have unlock some secret options and wait 24 hours every time I want to wire money to a new account.

    A lot of services will do the verification step where it sends a few cents to and from a newly linked account which can take 1-3 business days. You only do it the one time. It's a small speed bump that prevents millions of dollars in fraud every year.

    To me this change to sideloading is a very similar speed bump. You do it the one time then set it to allow sideloading indefinitely. That's where it's at now.

    If they move to extend the delay or strip out the "indefinite" option then yeah, freak the fuck out and grab some pitchforks because that's not good at all. But where this specific change is at I see it as more anti-fraud than anti-consumer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Ugh. You're not wrong, but I wouldn't say you're really "right" here either.

    Scammers will find a way around this. They always do. But it puts a significant, real burden on people that own their devices and want to things perfectly within legal and social norms. In a legal sense, it "limits enjoyment of one's own property." Which is the same kind of term used for when the stink from a pig farm makes it impossible to go outside. The pork lobby doesn't make the decision to keep the farm, a local judge does because it's about the individual not allowed to use their property how they like.

    This limits my enjoyment of my property, and doesn't actually solve any real problems. It's an excuse to lock down the OS for closed commercial use.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)