Your tele-screen is watching you back…

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 2 months ago

The headline should more accurately be "The LG problem."

  • source
  • 53 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 80 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    These Smart TVs are hanging in lots of meeting rooms at companies around the world. I wonder how many IT departments thought about checking for this.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    They don't care... Most of the "IT departmens" at the companies I worked for were not interested in security stuff besides the employees' endpoints.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago

    I used to work for an MSP (Managed Service Provider), can confirm. Security is something I had to redirect attention to on a day-to-day basis. Even then, the company was more concerned with appearance and audit compliance than security.

    I have worked at IT companies that really did care about security, but those companies were driven by management and staff that personally cared about IT security. One of them was a certificate authority.

    Here's a story about physical security from before that time.

    I once had equipment in a Data Center that was embedded in the 4th floor of an office building. There was a mantrap at the entrance, designed to prevent you from walking away with the main DC door open, or letting people tailgate in to it. One of the doors of the mantrap was a sliding door, disguised as a bit of the hallway.

    The sliding door was locked with a maglock on the thin end, so when it fully closed, it locked and you couldn't slide it open without a key card, from inside or out.

    ...unless you bumped in to it with your shoulder, which separated the lock and opened the door. Which, after it was figured out (about 1 month), happened all the time. People would get let in to the DC without a card that opened that specific door. (DC security control provisioned the main door was separate from building control, which managed the sliding door).

    When they tried to get out later, they'd get stuck in the mantrap, then they'd wait for someone to let them out (pre-cellphones). That person would then show them the trick. This was so common they turned off the forced-lock alarm. This lead to the mantrap being useless, and people propping the DC door open for ease of access when moving stuff in and out.

    This was put in place in 2001, and I visited the building last year in 2025, it's still in place today.

    It's worth noting that this DC was shared by multiple competitive reinsurers, ISPs and financial agencies. The were no cameras outside or inside, and you could poke most server reset buttons through the rack cages with the ink cartridge of a ball point pen. Not everyone was shown that trick.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 2 months ago

    And it's no only LG, it's all of them

    "LG Isn't the Only TV Company Spying on You" https://youtu.be/IvFu343KNek

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    i wonder what our stock phones are doing.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    My Samsung TV will never see a WiFi password in its life.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I have an open guest network and the neighbour's TV is on it...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    That’s wild. I guess I need to do a review of my setup…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It's completely isolated from my own network. Ironically, it would almost be safer to put my TV on it instead of my home network.

    The annoying thing is that if I have a dedicated clanker VLAN, I can't cast to my TV.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago

    All you need to know is the US military bas to block ad Ids on their soldiers phones to stop people from buying data with a credit card to find them.

    It cannot continue to be acceptable for companies to track anyone and everyone at this level.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I'm wondering if something like a PiHole can "fake" a connection for these devices.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    I don't know about that part (though would like to know as well), this is currently blocked on my pi-hole:

    including my custom RegExs. This surely helps but there are domains constantly pop-up every now and then, so it's not fool-proof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    It put my TV in its own group in pi-hole, blocked everything (.*) for that group, and then whitelisted what I wanted the TV to be able to get to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I should try this. I presume you would need static IP on your TV?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You can also add devices to groups by MAC address or hostname, but a static IP might be best.

    I only need a couple of domains to work. My way could be a hassle if you need to figure out whitelists for a few services.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I caught an app that my daughter's school uses called ClassDojo that wouldn't work at my company for some reason. I had to reach out to our security admin and it turns out it was doing DNS lookups by bypassing my company's DNS server. I submitted a ticket to the company and they ended up either designing the app to fallback to the device's assigned DNS or either probably doing something else shady. Idk, it works now.

    My point is there's more than one way to do a DNS lookup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Yeah that looks suspicious.

    It's definitely not fool-proof, apparently they can bypass DNS for their connections too. On the other hand, IP block is a thing as well, so maybe it's a double-edged sword for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago

    While I haven't heard about any TVs that do this, seems like only a matter of time until Tvs that won't function unless they can contact the mothership.

    It wouldn't be hard to make it. Or w/e other consumer devices. Just gate all functionality behind the user "agreeing". Most ppl will click OK on literally anything.

    By clicking agree, you accept that we or our 1829 partners can break into your house, steal your shit, shoot your puppy, plant rootkits in all your devices, piss in your pot of soup, and set the place on fire before we go. Millions of ppl -> Clicks OK.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Watched this last night. I'm wondering if I could make money lobotomizing smart TVs. Remove the WiFi antenna and either remove the mic or put a actual hardwire switch to it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    You'd have to test whether the TV's firmware allows it to run without the microphone or WiFi. Some manufacturers will anticipate people trying to control their own tech and shut their device down at any sign of tampering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    Even if you never connect to wifi TVs can seek out open connections, so is there a way to disrupt or weaken the wifi signal range on TVs without physically opening it?

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -3 points 2 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    It's literally mentioned in the video

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    It's mentioned in the first half hour, but I don't have the timestamp

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 2 months ago* (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    A company that is harvesting data is better to not be given benefit of the doubt. I'm left trusting them less as opposed to trusting them to respect privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Preaching caution is FUD? Like telling people to not trust Windows, moving to custom roms like GrapheneOS on phones, or taking steps tp cease online connection of smart devices?

    All corporations are data harvesting these days, so not trusting them and taking steps to reduce exposure seems to be good advice these days.

    You give off the vibe of just trust them unless proven otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Shit, I don't even own that many TVs

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    I wonder if they just call a MS Win11 API to get their tracking ID just to make it a well rounded spy conglomerate

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    So, We should take lg employees hostage. Tell them we're just extracting useful data to sell.

    Or you know Luigi because let's be real none of us getting a dime.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Absolutely wild that Sceptre seems to be the last brand without a smart TV, is generally cheaper, and has more ports than the Samsung one I bought a few years ago, which can't be better than LG

  • source
  • [+] -8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    And if you click the YT link, Google is spying on you. Sad no alternative is given, but that would hurt the bottom line, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Look you are right, but everything that promotes awareness about privacy it's a plus in my book.

    Being the devil's advocate, nexus gamer is not a privacy channel. They are a tech one that started doing some journalism and they seem to be new to the privacy side of things. This story come about after the monitor ad pop stuff.

    Related rant: For me phones are way more scary, they are everywhere, and you have no control on your friends and family devices. You can´t ask everyone to buy pixels and install graphene os on them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Its an interesting topic of discourse, no?

    And certainly some argument such as "more eyes" can be a valid part of the overall discussion.

    For myself, I would counter that posting YT links in a privacy focused community is defeatist in nature. Literally rewarding a platform, influencers that actually have no genuine interest in the topic, other than they found a new crowd they can cash in upon.

    Obviously I didn't watch, but informed guess -- the video was 10 times longer than it needed to be, filled with fluff to fit in ever more commercials and/or inline promotions?

    Does anyone interested in privacy not know TVs are invasive & nasty?

    Perhaps. So start a topic upon it, without feeding the beast you wish to slay. Its truly a good discussion. And much valuable input from those who have confronted it can be shared.

    I do agree, phones are horrific, and none of my crowd cares about privacy. Running a degoogled OS, no microG, no play store, only open source apps. We all try to take whatever steps we can, and its not easy, including changing ones online habits, usually the biggest obstacle. Which makes putting YT links in these privacy forums insulting.

    Seriously. That is my (unpopular) opinion. I call it my ongoing journey to walk the walk best as able.

    One can be offended, or reflect upon their habits effecting real change. I'll end my rants on this topic now. Cheers, mate!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Yeah you are right, posting a youtube link was a bad call from op, even the rules on the forum frown on it. (First rule even!) A better approach would have been a summary or article with the important points.

    And I have to be fair with you.... you guessed right. The video is too long, I had to skip a lot since they were repeating the same things over and over. Worse part is that, my awareness pitch, fell flat. I just checked the comments in the video, half of the section reads like this:

    "I wont buy from LG anymore" "FuckLG" "Thas why i don't use tvs"

    They didn't understand that the problem is bigger than one brand or device, that there's a whole system behind this. Nor the irony of being horrified of spying software while signed to google services.

    Sigh.. maybe i shouldn't rush to be a devil's advocate anymore... it always bites me back.

    Anyways, I still think is important to reach people where they are, and youtube videos should help, it has reach and its were the more oblivious guys are. Although, it would have been really really nice from them to host it in a less hostile platform for everyone else.

    Now like you, i will end my rant here. Loved yours, even if it was a little spicy, which may have offended some people. But there was truth there, and for me at least, made me reconsider some things.

    Cheers!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    Must be loud for anyone listening if i flick against the tv (or phone or any other internet device) so i do it regulary to repel the cia 😡

  • source
  • 18 comments in c/videos@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 12 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    I bought an LG TV two months before I heard about any of the fuckery LG pushes through their TVs. Granted I don’t allow any device internet access but I’m still pissed.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    The device record audio, even without internet.

    Check the video for more info.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Never let it connect to internet.

    This is a temporary solution though. One day they'll just include cellular connectivity into their TVs once it gets cheap enough to do so. And this is terrifying because by then there will be no escape from their surveillance short of hacking into it or putting it in a faraday cage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    They look for any WiFi device you have, or your neighbours, HDMI connection(Those are 2 way connections BTW that can connect through devices that are plugged into your internet), or any other random laptop, phone, or neighbour's device that it can connect with. Just unplugging them from the internet does nothing. They keep recording and as soon as you have to plug in again or another route is available, Boom goes the dynamite.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    i literally bought lg tv hours before their first driver fuckery came to light. im learning how to jailbreak my tv i hope its enough

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    A new, fully open source firmware is way better than simply not hooking it to Internet, but the only real fix is to disconnect or burn the modem and microphone. Obviously, we all have different a different level of attack surface that makes us feel comfortable. I'm just giving you a heads up. You never know what's in the other chips.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago*
    [–] 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I just bought 3 of these how do I fix it 😭

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I am at work now so i haven't seen the video but can anyone recommend a cheap good "scanner" or something like that that could show me which devices are listening to me and my family?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    The only good scanner is your frontal lobe. Most scanners are a scam prying on fear of the uneducated. Every smart device is a potential attack vector, and there are two class of entities that can use your device maliciously. Black hat hackers that put malware for residential proxy services or manufactures selling data to advertisers. There are ways to mitigate the risk like air-gapping, putting them on separate network, jailbreaking and buying dumb devices.

  • source
  • parent
  • 9 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    Did a gas leak happen in here? Why are the comments on this post so weird?

    Maybe some people are a bit too 'all or nothing' when it comes to privacy. Youtube isn't the best, but what Gamers Nexus does is incredible investigative journalist work and they should be celebrated for it. I'd have had no idea about this had they not done the work they did. Fuck Google, for sure, but let's not toss the baby out with the bathwater.

    Privacy is really more a spectrum than anything. A spectrum of what are you willing to deal with and how much is it going to impact your life. At least that is how I see that. Anyways, on that note, fuck LG.

  • source
  • [+] -20 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Posted on YouTube, known fascist spy shop

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

    https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=6IFVTcM28KA

    I'm not a fan of YT so the least you could do in a privacy sub is post an alt link for Christ's sake... Also, that fucking video is 2 HOURS?! Oh hell no!

    Edit: OK I watched about 10 minutes, going to dig into my old 2016 LG TV to see if it does this... 3D or not, it'll go into the trash!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    These guys are spending tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours of their time to bring this information to you and advocating for your privacy rights and you complain about where the video is hosted and the length of it?

    At least include a link to their Patreon in your whining posts, https://www.patreon.com/gamersnexus

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Tens of thousands off YouTube... So why the fuck would I support them through Patreon when they get YT money?!

    Good for them for doing the PSA and research, is appreciated. But I'm not utilizing a YT link and am respecting others' data privacy too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Read more carefully, I said they are spending tens or hundreds of thousands to do this stuff, not that they are earning that amount. Youtube income doesnt cover the costs. Thats why they have merch and other sales. They also don't have third party sponsors anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [+] -7 points 2 months ago

    Pssshh, some of us have lives and don't feel like watching 2 hours of some YT channel when the gist can be wrapped up in a <15 minutes. Plus, this is a privacy group, should be respectful of NOT using a big bro link, but I get some people don't actually care or understand the premise.

    Grow a backbone for your data privacy.

  • source
  • parent
  • 1 comment in c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    [–] 12 points 2 months ago

    Its so oppressive out here.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/privacy@sopuli.xyz view that post
    [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    "LIfe's Good", more like "Life's Grim".

  • source