Good! That 76 year old Cancer Fighter doing things by the Books is a CRIMINAL!
-People who Voted for a Convicted Felon!
post
replies:
I can hear the magats now, "Well if ICE took him then he was obviously doing something illegal" with no further thoughts.
replies:
Cruelty is the point.
replies:
Hell is a bullshit concept. But God damn if there isn't a part of me that wants it to exist and the people responsible for this, having to explain their cruelty to their maker before fucking burning for eternity
replies:
The US Government can't spend money to fight cancer anymore. It only fights people WITH cancer instead.
This is horrific and upsets me. It's worth reading more than the headline.
That sentence just kept getting worse.
Sent to likely die,
Cruel and unusual,
That’s the u s a
replies:
As an atheist shit like this makes me hope I’m wrong so these fuckers burn in hell.
replies:
He won't get his medication in the camps, another murder is what this is
Evil continues to win. We can stop it anytime we are willing to really fight back untill then, they continue to win.
"I just wish they would come here the right way."
White middle class citizens who have spoken against the regime will be next.
The wrong way to "fight cancer"
He's MS-13 guys
Pfft, cancer thing shouldn't even be a factor in this until it's at least stage 5.
Legitimately a lawyer can fix this. He has a clean record and that is all that will matter.
replies:
8 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
ICE spokesperson Jason Chudy said the agency arrested Javar because he allegedly failed to disclose a criminal conviction when applying for his immigrant visa in 1995. Chudy declared that Javar was “therefore ineligible to remain in the United States now.”
This is the kind of stuff that previous administrations overlooked and used their discretion on. This administration is mainly applying the immigration law strictly according to the letter. The immigration laws themselves really suck and they have for a long time.
replies:
Completely devoid of moral and empathy. Sickening.
Hypothetically, let's say a political party passes a law against murder that mandates long prison sentences, then another political party comes along and uses the same law to jail people who have not committed murder, is the first political party responsible for what the second political party did?
In case you are confused by my comment, you have to read the article to understand. It alleges democrats are responsible for creating the immigration enforcement structures which republicans are now abusing.
replies:
all 44 comments