Meanwhile “aggressive” vegan messaging just describes things for what they are, even downplaying them, because there is no way to describe the horrors in words
post
The famous achieving of utopia by doing nothing and crying on twitter strat
"we need to radically transform society"
"I agree, tried eating different?"
"omg too hard"
Not trying to pick a fight, trying to understand...
Can you explain how going vegan (I assume what you're referencing when you say "eat different") would stop, slow, or in any appreciable way alter the rise of fascism? Or genocides? Or police brutality?
The two seem, while granted one is exponentially better for the planet as a whole, completely disconnected from one another?
Or are you merely saying that the act of switching eating habits is good practice for the hardship and sacrifice required to change the other, aforementioned issues?
The entire moral foundation of leftism is is that we ought to arrange the world such that suffering is not inflicted on others for the gain of the few.
If you are unconcerned with the horror of carnism you are only concerned with the rights of those you deem sufficiently similar to you based on arbitrarily selected metrics, the reciting of which has a curious tendency to make someone sound like a Nazi: intelligence (as defined by an ability to peform certain specific tasks rather arbitrarily selected), or appearance, or genetics.
Either we are concerned with suffering or we are not. The practice of continually and regularly brutalising other creatures we know feel and suffer as much as we can know any other human does harms us, slaughterhouse workers suffer PTSD and display rates of violence above the normal. There are reasons that Nazis copied factory farming. It trains us in the process of dehumanisation (even that term is loaded), it harms the people involved, it harms the animals, and it gets you practicing that it is simply ok not to care or change anything if the treats you get by doing so are sufficiently enjoyable.
Thank you for your response, if it's okay with you and you have time, I would love to ask a few more questions. Again, I promise I'm not trying to pick a fight or poke holes, I'm genuinely trying to reconcile things inside my head:
Has all of human history been fascist since humans have always consumed other beings?
The horrors of factory farming are indefensible, no argument. What about the farm who only raises enough for his family? Take that one far as you want, a single cow...flock of chickens, you get the idea. I'm more interested in the spirit than the semantics.
This one kind of spins off of question one, but I'd like to delve into this one...what about the Native Americans, who harvested, utilized the entire animal, had reverence for its spirit, its sacrifice?
Thank you for your response, it has been enlightening thus far.
literally all arguments for veganism have already been hashed out. Go look them up, it's a waste of my time to present worse versions off the top of my head.
Understood, have a nice day.
You're not gonna look them up lmao
You know what they say when you assume.
The question becomes which source? Considering the fact I know nothing about the political ramifications of a system I don't take part in, I'm essentially starting from scratch. I can go toss is a search engine "political ramifications of veganism" and wade through a million million lines of AI slop and opinion pieces and still be no closer to an answer than when I started.
So yes, I am going to look "them" up... just as soon as I figure out which "them" I'm looking for.
Pass on anything noteworthy you find my way, will you? I think we're on similar journeys.
why don't you try comlib or anarchistslib if you want to find writings by leftists for leftists?
That is more information than I had 5 minutes ago, thank you.
Bonus points if there are any authors or specific pieces you think would be beneficial to read?
could do worse than this https://caroljadams.com/spom-the-book for the intersection between carnism and patriarchy
It was interesting, and highlighted several misconceptions I've held about veganism in general. Thank you for sending me down this rabbit hole. I'll read yours next.
Edit: it's an ad for a book, not a paper or article. I'll see if I can track it down through my local library.
https://annas-archive.gl/ will have a copy
You're framing your expectations of veganism in a way where you will always fail to see its significance. The answer to your question is trivial.
"Veganism as a movement detracts from the rise of fascism, the normalisation of genocides and the prevalence of police brutality by challenging people to be more empathetic, live more sustainably and make individual choices towards a larger goal."
You will never consider this an acceptable answer however and regardless of how you frame your reason for it being unacceptable, the truth is, for you it has to be unacceptable because you have a cultural connection to eating meat and an emotional reaction to the idea of changing that behavior. And in that sense your thinking is parallel to that of the fascist, the genocider and of the exploitative police officer.
And if none of that makes it to you; vegans as are group are overwhelmingly left wing people. Why would that be the case if the movement itself wasn't inherently a left wing movement?
Is the "you" in this a general you, or are you speaking directly to me? The answer this question will change how I interpret and respond.
The wholesale imprisonment, torture, rape and murder of living beings IS fascism, on the scale of trillions of exploited animals per year. How we treat non-human creatures reflects how we treat each other. We’re committing genocide towards all living beings.
So much this.
It makes me wonder whether many “leftists” are just lib poseurs, who are only leftists when it comes to their immediate frustrations in the present. Like the type who “grow up,” earn a decent amount of money and abandon their values under the spell of a bigger paycheck. Or when the economy goes through a normal cyclical upswing, all of the sudden, capitalism is not so bad. Similar to 80s “yuppie” liberals. Then, they talk down to all the “lazy, unsuccessful people.”
Like, if you’re really down with the cause - what you out on your plate is a high modifiable behavior that is well within the realms of cost and feasibility for everyone. If you can say, “Hey, I’m cool with paying half my income in taxes to ensure a better society for all,” why can’t you make another simple anti-exploitation concession?
The excuses are wild. “Veganism isn’t possible for most under capitalism, it’s too expensive, it only becomes feasible under socialism.” WTF, you realize in a socialist world, if ridiculous demand for animal products is still a thing, then the means of production will still find a way to meet that demand?
Notable case of Goomba fallacy.

There surely are fire breathing anti capitalist types who have some personal animosity against vegans but it seems likely these are not always the same people.
Wait, the rich aren’t on the vegan approved diet
the rich are for feeding to the plants
The "eating" is actually metaphorical. Just look at Elon Musk and think "I want him in my mouth"
Yeah, just fucking shoot him in the back of the skull and dispose the body responsibly in a mass grave with others like him
That's not really a vegan unique thing.
There are many varieties of leftist that are extremely focused on purity testing everyone and automatically reject anyone that isn't sufficiently pure by their standards.
I choose to avoid them.
I find leftist political events very isolating since rejecting carnism. It's hard to take people talking about fairness and humanitarianism seriously when they still have the flesh of vulnerable individuals stuck between their teeth. The whole time I'm there, that's all I'm thinking. But you know it's not going to be received well if you say anything...
Yes, clearly leftism is the complete and total enemy of vegans and vegetarians. Surely conservative and liberals will be the true allies. Stunning argument.
I don't want to be vegan. It has nothing to do with messaging, I just like eating meat. I don't support the way we abuse animals for food either, but I'm not willing to go vegan over it. Nobody's perfect. At least I know what I am and can accept that.
Well you could still eat plant based meats from the likes of impossible and beyond. You might say that it's not the same, but is that difference really worth supporting animal abuse? (and yes, you are supporting it by buying meat). It's not even the difference between a burger and no burger, it's between a burger and another burger that maybe tastes slightly different. I've never been able to understand that. Am I missing something?
I went vegan around the time Beyond and Impossible burgers took off and after just about six months I’d ordered a Beyond burger but was given a regular one, and it was already pretty fucking gross to be eating dead animals even early on at that point.
Once the novelty of beyond burgers worse off, I couldn't really stand the taste. They are nauseatingly sweet, and have a very distinct flavour. Same with their sausages, stakes, they all taste the same.
I've since found better more neutral local brands that I like much more.
...you do support the way we abuse animals for food though, you fund it. Like, intentionally.
I would never support abusing animals.
Absolutely supports abusing animals.
I totally get it! I'm a serial murderer and like, I don't want people to be hurt or dead but I just like murdering so much. At least I know what I am and can accept that 🥰
Yeah I feel the same way owning a diamond mine. I know I could improve conditions and to be honest they're pretty horrifying but I just really enjoy being able to buy whatever I want.
Nobody's perfect, at least I know what I am and can accept that.
If you knew what you were doing was immoral, and you kept doing it anyway for pleasure….
There is no moral way to use the bodies of animals for our personal consumption.
We can say nobody is perfect, so I’m going to murder some of the time, because I enjoy it.
It’s not nearly as impossible as you think to go vegan.
Excellent bait - but does it serve the vegan cause?
Judging from the responses in the comments, probably not.
It's a good post if you want to feel good about yourself though I guess?
Edit: given the downvotes, I suspect advancing the vegan cause was never the objective.
Yeah, maybe vegans should try less aggressive messaging
At least one person has been brave enough to read at least one argument as a result. Are you brave enough to watch how pigs are killed?
If you have sat with the dying and been with them at the moment of passing you will understand that there is no courage in watching death. To suggest so is an insult to those with cherished dead.
Such tactics as these do not convince a person to embrace veganism; it seeks to shame them into being a part of it. Such tactics provoke ire over awe, and are ultimately self defeating; much as the provocative measures in the op.
Do you have the courage to make your case to the unconverted without guilt as your only ally?
Yeah man you're so enlightened for staying ignorant of the moral cost of your recreational dietary choices.
Why do chuds immediately start writing like they're penning some missive in the east India trading company the moment they're called out? Is it a genetic memory of chuddiness?
There is courage in watching death you cause or ignore, and there is also courage in watching the death of those who you are the witness and advocate for, or you know being there for someone's last moments.
Ah, let's counter that.
I write in an academic style because that is my profession - but I can understand this might be unusual to you.
In your esteemed brilliance you've managed to conflate courage with a sense of justice, protectiveness, and compassion in a single paragraph. The courage of an action lies in the heart of the individual - not in the nature of the action. Your use of the word evokes only images of mindless zealotry - "be brave, do what I tell you".
There isn't any more to be said here really; a consequence of your own actions. Such egregious arrogance has only harmed your cause - be better.

Yeah you were so close to behaving better but then someone ridiculed you so you just changed all your opinions about ethics.
wait are you a vegan trying to tell other vegans how to do better messaging or a carnist?
I'm someone slowly transitioning to vegetarian who doesn't like watching a good cause get mangled by utter arses.
I don't aim to go entirely vegan as I don't believe all animal products are immoral (honey, real free range eggs (a friend of mine used to keep chickens, and their life was wonderful), snake shed (great for gardens) etc). I've opted for a slow and sustainable transition to where I draw my moral lines as I prefer certain success over dramatic gestures
This is how I was persuaded to make my changes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sVfTPaxRwk
The posts I see on c/vegan have made this harder to do rather than easier, as they often denigrate the morality of those who choose to eat meat, and add to my doubts of the real morality of the movement. There are many folks in my life who eat meat who I judge to be morally superior to the shills I find on here.
you do you - but I wonder what does your friend do with the chicks from fertilised eggs? or do they not have a rooster? and if so where do they get their replacement chickens? and if so what do those breeders do with their male chicks?
and again I'm of the opinion that its better 90% of people go mostly veggie than 10% go fully vegan (from a practical point of view) but I'm also of the opinion that being annoying about veganism isn't like a cardinal sin - people are annoying for much less important things
and yh while I agree that there can be less moral vegans than carnists (eg if you're a vegan exploiting people) - I would still rate most vegans as more moral than most carnists - since in my experience most vegans do it because of empathy not because of brownie points - from the outside it may seem different but you also have to recognise just how carnist society is and how jaded vegans become when they are faced with the same arguments day in and day out - when their cause (that is the single most beneficial thing one can individually do for people, animals and planet) gets dismissed as "uppity" - and it's quite hard to not lose your cool when every time some mentions bacon the first thing that pops into your mind is the hellish sound of pigs screaming as they die an excruciating death for the sole benefit of hedonistic pleasure
Does your academic style always include snide personal attacks? And to accuse others of arrogance on top of it. You're not being a serious person right now.
You are not the only one here who has sat with death or has dead loved ones. That is a nearly universal experience. The fucking arrogance.
It's a post made to a vegan community, for other vegans to read. It's only function is, in fact, to make the poster feel good.
No one is going to further "the vegan cause" by posting to a vegan community on a fringe website and that was never the point.
I appreciate posts like this. The debates in the comments show people's beliefs are being challenged and it's reaching people who are at least willing to consider the argument instead of dismissing it out of hand. You can't change someone's mind without introducing doubt, and pointing out a double standard is a good approach. In contrast, a post with no objections is likely only reaching people already convinced.
top 93 comments