top 86 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 58 points 2 months ago (3 children)

So....a Jewish space laser controlled by the Rothschild's?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Unfortunately the Rothschilds have been basically irrelevant since WWII so it'll be controlled by someone else, but yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    What, they suddenly realise there's babies and children in places other than Palestine, or something?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 41 points 2 months ago*

    Some kind of laser? In space? Controlled by who?!

  • source
  • [–] 41 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    You mean Space Lazers or dare I say... Jewish Space Lazers?

    I miss living in a time when that was a funny statement

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago*

    We're Jews out in space
    We're zooming along protecting the Hebrew race
    We're Jews out in space
    If trouble appears we put it right back in its place

    When goyim attack us
    We give 'em a smack
    We'll slap them right back in the face

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    When they say they are planning to develop them, what they mean is that they are planning to make their existence public. You should assume Jewish Space Lasers are literally a thing today.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 76 points 2 months ago (18 children)

    Dr. Greene?! Paging Dr. Marjorie Taylor Greene?!

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [+] -50 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    She has some terrible ideas, but the way they smeared her over this reminds me how they attacked Mamdani calling him an antisemitic Jihadist. Sad so many people on the left merely parroted their pro-genocide AIPAC politicians at the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 73 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (14 children)

    Dude, fuck off. Marjorie Taylor Greene is a white supremacist. She was talking about nonsensical antisemitic conspiracy theories she got off of social media (she was blaming US wildfires on "Jewish space lasers"). Do not try to "well, ackshually" her with this revisionist garbage. She never had a point, and anything resembling one was accidental.


    Edit: Oh, you're one of those Jill Stein assholes. That actually checks out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    ewwwww jill stein can eat rocks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Non-US guy here, what's going on with Jill Stein?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Our electoral laws naturally result in a two-party system with (for the last century) the Democrats as the relative left and Republicans as the relative right. There are only two other parties that have any significance at all - the Green Party, which is ecologically focused party that backs renewable energy as their main feature, but is also very socially liberal; and the Libertarian Party, which is like the Republicans except they're in favor of legalizing recreational drugs and abolishing even more regulations than the Republicans.

    Jill Stein has been the head of the Greens since 2012 or so. Under Stein's leadership, the Greens don't really run for any offices other than President. Despite their platform being very popular in Democrat dominated areas, sometimes more popular than the actual Democrat platform, they almost never make a real attempt to run for city or state positions. Instead, the Green Party almost exclusively runs in the presidential election, and exclusively fields Jill Stein as their candidate. Due to our archaic first-past-the-post system, having two candidates on the relative left makes it easier for a candidate on the relative right to win, even if a majority of voters would prefer a relative left candidate, due to the votes getting split. The Greens also make bigger pushes in what are expected to be closer elections, spending more money and maintaining a larger media presence, siphoning votes from the Democratic candidate despite never having done better in a presidential election than 2.7% of all votes. However, in areas that flip parties frequently, that percentage is higher and they often function as a spoiler candidate, handing what should be a close win for a Democrat to an easy win for a Republican.

    Stein herself has also been seen at events with Putin, has repeated Russian propaganda about Ukraine and NATO, and has been investigated by the FBI for possible collusion with the Russian government to interfere in US elections.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    from the article:

    "And my own connection to RT, you know ironically, it takes a Russian television station to actually be open to independent candidates in this country and that is a shame. A shameful commentary on our own media," she told NBC's Alex Seitz-Wald

    there is nothing suspicious about her presence at the event

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (2 children)

    she condemned the Russian invasion of Ukraine. hilary Clinton has been seen at events with Putin. the investigation found nothing untoward on her behalf.

    this insinuation is insidious.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Shes a Putin patsy that manipulates 3rd party voters into throwing away everything to further enable Trump's shit.

    Theres a photo of her sitting at Putin's table.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Way to repeat the smears that were investigated and proven by the Senate Intelligence Committee to have no merit. The only people that enabled Trump was Genocide Joe, Kamala Cheney, and all her joyful pro-genocide supporters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -16 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    She never said "Jewish space lasers." You're doing exactly what I said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    I'm aware she never literally said the words "Jewish space lasers". What she did is blame the Rothschilds (by name) for funding "what looked like lasers or blue beams of light causing the fires".

    There's absolutely zero reason for her to be bringing the Rothschilds into this except as antisemitic dogwhistling. She has a history of antisemitism outside of this too, of course:

    In December 2018, she shared a video on her Facebook page, which features a prominent British anti-Semite [note: Holocaust denier] explaining that “Zionist supremacists have schemed to promote immigration and miscegenation.” This is a conspiracy theory that seemingly motivated the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter’s rampage in October 2018, less than two months before Greene’s post. Despite concrete evidence that these ideas were endangering American Jews, Greene chose to spread them anyway.

    She's also claimed George Soros "OWNS Antifa" and is an "ex-Nazi billionaire" (notably, Soros survived Nazi-occupied Hungary as a Jewish child).

    She knew exactly what she was saying; her post boils down to "Jewish space lasers", which is why anyone with any sense called it for what it is. Do not try to play pedant to pussyfoot around MTG's white supremacist antisemitism, you little weasel.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    They need to be able to orbitally bombard Palestinian schoolchildren - matter of national security

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Hamas made them go to space obviously.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Netanyahu: "I will go to the last place not corrupted by living journalists general concern for human rights brown people Hamas anti-semitism - *giggles* - SPAAAACE!"

    *vaporizes a hospital from orbit*

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    And here I was, thinking the Jewish space lasers are just a silly conspiracy.

    When have conspiracy theories turned into trailers?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I thought there were agreements regarding the fact that weapons should not be deployed to space.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    From what I understand it's only WMDs that are internationally banned from space, while obviously a rather distasteful thing to do it's not unlawful to put conventional weapons in space. The Soviets armed some of their space stations with autocannon for example, which isn't even the best example of their space programme making Bond villains everywhere look like complete scrubs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    No one was ever going to respect such an agreement. This stuff has been in the works for a while. Russia looks like it's testing out it's own satelite killing tech as we speak as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 2 months ago

    Capable of targeting a specific orphan at a specific hospital and obliterating the whole fucking thing from high earth orbit.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago

    Just when you thought they couldn't get evil enough, now we have literal Saturday morning cartoon villain levels of evil!

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Frankly terrifying. Like, imagine if the Nazis had been first to develop nuclear weapons kind of terrifying.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago

    Israel will set them up to fire on everyone if they ever fall. It's the same thing with their nuclear arsenal, but even more out of reach. That's what they use when they can't bribe politicians to support them.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago

    Ah yes, like the nazis with the V2, the first rocket to reach space! They are so on track with the nazi agenda.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    This will result in the station getting blown and a lot of space debrees. I don't think it is gonna be a good tool, USA already had Rods from God idea and it wasn't implemented cause the cost/effect is questionable.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I do not trust an evil nation like Israel with weapons like this. Not at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago

    So MTG was right…

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    Hang on, isn't "the only reason we (US) haven't done that is because it's illegal and also I'm pretty sure we've secretly done that already?"

    I mean, it's clear international law no longer applies but isn't this another example of that?

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Space is a neutral zone like the Antarctic. Like they have any right to bring weaponry over there.

    Rather than having weaponry to protect Earth against external threats like asteroids, they’d point the weapons inwards to oppress the population of Earth.

    This administration should be dismantled as soon as possible. It’s toxic to the world.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Rather than having weaponry to protect Earth against external threats like asteroids, they’d point the weapons inwards to oppress the population of Earth.

    What, a fine upstanding state like Israel? Never.

    I didn't read the article, I would assume no one reading it is dumb enough to think Israel has any intention of using weapons deployed in space for anything other than killing Muslim schoolchildren. And probably eventually Jewish schoolchildren who's parents don't align with Zionism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Well, we had a good run. Pack it in, folks.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Robert Heinlein wrote stories about this topic and not all turned out well.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    ion cannon network belongs to EA.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    And make US pay for it

  • source
  • [+] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    And you'd be correct. The only reason Israel is a tech powerhouse is them having a captive and defenseless population in which to field-test anything they come up with, AND THEN have everything paid for by the US taxpayer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    As much as we can shit on them, but 4 billion military assistance from the USA does NOT pay everything given the military budget of more than 10x that at 45 billion $. It is a rich country.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    So... How are they going to launch them?

    Reads a bit like the obsession a certain dictator had with wunderwaffe.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    America will do it for them. Israel doesnt have much of a space program that can even come remotely close developing any of these goals on its own, they use a deep partnership with NASA ..aka they are gifted data and designs by bribed US politicians.. or they flat out steal it, like they did with all of their nuclear material stolen from the US: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_affair

    they also dont have an economy large enough to fund researching any of this out or doing it. Israels entire GDP (PPP based) is only 600 billion. The tiny state of Massachusetts alone has a GDP of 780 billion.. about 25% larger than Israels.. just Massaschusetts. The city of Boston has a GDP of 610 million. And the whole US gdp is ~50 times what Israels is.

    Israel is reading out a list of what they will order Americans to provide for them for free so they can pretend they developed it themselves. Same as with the Israeli F-35 program and their naval tech. See how they pretend they have extended the F-35 with native tech to make it vastly superior to the US f-35: https://defense.info/air-power-dynamics/2025/06/israels-f-35i-adir-a-strategic-game-changer-in-middle-east-air-power/

    They are bullshitters, pedophiles, criminals, and welfare queens.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Let's not tell them it's s waste of money and let them go broke.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You know they’ll find a way to make the USA taxpayer pay for it. Like everything else they do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    We'll see. Everything the Zionist oligarchs are doing is hurtling us off a cliff; it'll be interesting to see if Israel can pull this off before we collapse the entire global capitalist system. My bet is that this is just like everything else these fucks are doing: Not meant to succeed, but meant to rape the last bit of money Americans can provide before it all goes to shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Space lasers yes, but I imagine that after the higher ups finally get the memo on that, most of the funding will go into optical imaging and SAR satellites for surveillance.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Huh and here I thought the Romanians would be doing that...

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    There will always be violence as long as so many are stuck in supernatural systems, that have to defeat the other supernatural systems, or variations of their own. All this violence over unfalsifiable stories, like Sagan's invisible dragon, but no one killed or abused over that story. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/107506-now-what-s-the-difference-between-an-invisible-incorporeal-floating-dragon

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Ah yes, because that is what they need.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago
    [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    They want a global nuclear strike capability that doesn't rely on making the US do the threat for them.

    Also probably a faster nuclear deployment time against Pakistan or I guess any other nuclear power.

  • source