Too late to add a Zeno's Barbershop stencil to the window?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno%27s_paradoxes#Dichotomy_paradox
Too late to add a Zeno's Barbershop stencil to the window?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno%27s_paradoxes#Dichotomy_paradox
You would eventually get down to the last hair, and then have a 50% chance to remove it with each subsequent haircut. This is his how homeopathic solutions can end up with literally no βactive ingredientβ, or only a small chance of containing a single molecule of it.
No, they'd just keep cutting the hair in half
It all depends if you know your limits
That's not how reflections work.
It's also not how "1/2 off" cuts work, animals don't go to a barber, nor do they talk.
But the reflection being unrealistic, yes, that's where we draw the line.
The cartoonist draws the line. I'm just a dog on the internet.
Yes, that is where we draw the line, because the things you listed are all part of the joke. The reflection is not (and is almost certainly due to lack of skill because reflections can be hard).
Should we never criticise any unrealistic aspect of something as soon as it contains one deliberate unrealistic aspect? Is the coffee cup on game of thrones unproblematic because we can just as well imagine they have Starbucks in Westeros as dragons? If someone draws a comic with a talking animal, is it no longer possible to critique the anatomy in their drawing?
Or does this not make sense, do we recognise a difference between deliberate deviations from reality and accidental ones (or deviations from the established or expected reality)?
You say it's not relevant to the joke, but a realistic reflection wouldn't show a side-by-side depiction. The way it's portrayed here highlights the hair cut that the animal is upset about, which is key to the joke.
It might not be realistic, but I see this as "artistic license," along with the other absurd elements.
After six or seven times it wonβt matter.
βΆπ€·ββοΈβ·
(I'm missing that ref, already seen several time, can someone explain me π’)
Nah, keep your mental health and forget this brainrot. XD
67 came from a song lyric, then a kid made a tiktok where he frantically said "six seveeen!! six seveeen!!" to the camera while doing a gesture with his hands. and because kids love pattern recognition, when they see the number it's easy to point it out and do the gesture. and so the meme spread.
the humor comes from it being nonsensical; the joke is on anyone who's either tired of it, or never found it funny at all, so i don't really see it going away anytime soon.
For a minute there I thought the Unicode Consortium did an extremely stupid decision, don't worry guys, it's 3 characters.
all 31 comments