He’s still taken seriously in these organizations despite all the allegations against him. Every day this stuff gets easier. I’ve partly automated it.

You know, one of the reasons women make better feds is they don't have such a severe, unseemly need to seek out sexual violence. I want to find the Catherine Shakdams. This guy even looks like a cop.

all 94 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 36 points 2 months ago* (10 children)

Having a sexuality is normal. Joking about it in public is normal. Having a sexuality does not make you less moral. Having a sexuality is not in conflict with holding radical political values. Being heterosexual is not a sign of immorality. Joking in a stressful and grave situation is not immoral. Being sad and serious 24/7 doesn't alleviate the consequences of a genocide. The puritanical values of the New York middle class are not universal despite the immense cultural power of the American empire.

If this guy sexually assaulted somebody, we can talk about it. But focusing on the evidence or testimonies, not on whatever this story means to you.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Exactly this. Thank you. Although I've never heard of this guy before so I don't have any context, but being anti-genocide is not exactly what I'd call a radical political view tbh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    No comedy police here, if this is your idea of a joke you might not have a serious girlfriend any time soon if that’s your goal… If it’s serious then I’d rather not bother getting into the deets of what is right and wrong, it’s just proven thru reactions of gross dudes like this. Yall will trust literal rapists like channel 5 Andrew Callahan and then go and defend dudes like this for making sexist comments on a freedom boat? How come I have to focus on the apartheid and not Jacob who clearly is focused on getting his rocks off in this post? It does just spell gross to me idk yall are pretty wild in defending this tbh. Comes across as unserious at the very least.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I have a partner who happens to be American and hates the Puritanism back home that wants everybody to erase their desires. In the rest of the world, sexual desire is normal, even when you're doing something serious with your life. And in the end, this guy's request for nudes probably has nothing to do with sex, but with validation and proximity, but the idea that talks about sex are never about actual sex is probably inconceivable in this conversation.

    By the way I'm not defending the guy. I'm attacking the pearl-clutching moralists who demand inhumane behavior from humans. The guy looks a bit like a loser for doing so, but there's a difference between being light and being harmful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    lol I’m not a puritan. You guys are being really gross. Go talk to a woman in person without hitting on her. Actually scratch that, just leave women alone. I know they already don’t feel comfortable around you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    lol I’m not a puritan

    Your comments all up and down this thread say otherwise.

    Actually scratch that, just leave women alone. I know they already don’t feel comfortable around you

    You don't know fuck all, but some we're making unwarranted assumptions based on social media comments, it seems to me like you probably wear black shirts with a white square collar and like little kids, which is probably why you're so grossed out by adults wanting to see other adults naked.

    See how fucking stupid that kind of thing is?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Most of my friends are women and it might surprise you, but I'm politically active in (sex-positive) feminist collectives. You really believe the whole world is like Brooklyn and that's your problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago*

    Bragging about your “feminist circles” online to make a point on a post about a man objectifying women that you’re defending is a strange choice. You should pay attention in those meetings more instead of oggling the women, maybe you’ll actually learn something.

    There is a very strange western liberal tendency to draw the line in patriarchal structures at women’s sexual liberation. Sexual freedom and liberation is important but it’s not the end of your duty as a man (or even as a woman) in a patriarchal society.

    I’m not gonna pretend I know what that Brooklyn comment means other than, shot in the dark, there’s a lot of rape that happens in big cities so people in general are more likely to be sexually repressed? And you think that’s a good argument against my point, that where rape culture is more prevalent they’re more, how you put it, puritan?

    Please, if you can, bring up this guy & his post in your feminist circles if you’re gonna use them to make a point on the internet and let me know what they think about your take on this Berger guy’s post. Seriously I would be interested.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    How to get thousands of dick pics that you definitely don't want 😉

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (45 children)

    Is there more context to this? Or have we really reached a point in secular puritans discourse where asking for nudes (as a blanket ask, even, not directed at anyone in particular) is "sexual violence"?

  • source
  • hideshow 45 child comments
  • [+] [S] -19 points 2 months ago (44 children)

    Yeah the context would be the people who said he assaulted them, who can be found by searching his name. I prefer to give as little context as possible so I can screenshot people on here defending asking for nudes on a boat named for a symbol of the children orphaned by genocide, left with no choice but to take up arms, from which people were kidnapped and assaulted by the IDF. This being their sole political goal other than recruiting grifters like Berger with a huge online following, and shielding them because of their reach.

    Now if you'll excuse me we have an epic crossover episode between Democracy Now! and a favorite around here, Novara Media

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 44 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    This is the only source I found when searching:
    https://israelfaqs.com/docs/who-is-jacob-berger-and-why-do-many-say-hes-not-what-he-pretends-to-be/

    Not gonna trust that for obvious reasons. Context matters. If this dude is raping people you should include the fucking context. Otherwise it just appears that you are helping push isntreal propaganda against flotilla activists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Are we for real using foxnews as source or are you agreeing that this is just israel propaganda?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    I'm not state-unitian, I knew nothing about Jacob Berger, and the OP has refused to clarify anything when asked. This is the first article I've found on the subject, which, for obvious reasons, I've marked as CW. Feel free to provide better sources so I can remove the Fox News one.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] [S] -11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (13 children)

    I think every next ant who skitters around to reveal they get their information from Israel FAQs (i.e. the first thing Google provided) rather than people like Nerdeen Kiswani is a plus.

    It's not like you would do anything if I gave you something convincing other than be quiet and glower. I know what you want, and it's not people who support the AoR, you want entertainment from Hollywood perverts. Why don't you wait for the Palestine movie?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    Yeah Idk what the fuck this says I am telling you theres nothing on the first four pages of DDG. So provide your own context if you want people to understand instead of this multipost rant saying fuck context trust me bro.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (8 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I see zero mention of this Jacob Berger guy in here. This article appears to be about somebody named Alex trying to attack Nerdeen with molotovs and then flee to Israel? No idea how its relevant here. I do see her saying he was grifting but not that he assaulted someone. you can even search "Jacob Berger Sexual Assault" on your engine of choice and get nothing but the article you linked and a fox news one calling him a grifter. Thats it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] [S] -6 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Doddering fool. Try searching her profile

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    https://xcancel.com/KatanaSpeaks/status/1975438344579653755#m

    Finally fucking found what you've been treating as Gospel. Its a string of tweets from someone claiming to have been SA'd by him. You could have just linked this, but you wanted to argue and put yourself above everyone instead of actually spreading awareness.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

    Can you explain what spreading awareness here would accomplish, other than more people like you harassing victims of sexual assault?

    Remember the very first thing you did after realizing that I am (always) right was deny their testimony. It's easy to predict because they grow you people in cloning vats.

    🤡 1
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Remember the first thing you did was refuse to elaborate, link the wrong person (Hana Katana does not appear to be Nerdeen), call me a fucken idiot, refuse to link anything further. You handled this entire thing with your nose turned down and adversarial. When instead you could have begun with this thread linked in your FUCKING post and everyone wouldnt have been hostile but inquisitive. You made this hostile, dont act like this is the norm.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Seriously not everyone can keep up with loser American trash doing what American trash does just give context when someone ask wtf.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] [S] -9 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Guy who thinks DDG (Bing, a k.a. Microsoft) is going to give him forthright information about any issue related to Palestine is a funny concept but being labelled "anarchist" just makes it perfect. I'm not saying trust me bro, bro. I'm saying keep showing how little any of you can find without my help, just like with Platner.

    Why not? Do you think you have any utility to the Palestinian resistance that you wouldn't have displayed in the past 3~ years? I think we have seen every card you have. Complain, complain, complain, the Israelis love it. At least I can feel out what information you have access to, and do something with that.

    All hail JaKKKob Burger the fat pussy king of the influencer yacht

    This comment is how you found out The Sameer Project is out of money. You never gave them a dime. How could I know that? Have I been invading your dreams?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    https://searx.tiekoetter.com/search?q=Jacob+berger&category_general=1&language=en-US&time_range=&safesearch=0&theme=simple

    Back yourself up then you cunt. Theres nothing. I can search the inside of your fucked up perspective if you want but I ain't reading your dumb ass shit that you refuse to back up. It'd be easy to get me on your side with evidence instead of being a whole ass bitch.

    Edit: and the fucking rapes would have nothing to do with Palestine for the record. Dude is American Egyptian.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (15 children)
  • [+] [S] -8 points 2 months ago* (14 children)

    I think the amazing thing about redditors is you actually believe coming at people with ignorant jackassery is a contribution, then when you see the natural response you act like you deserve something different, and you're just a widdle guy. Yes, I am baiting you into being a rape apologist so you go to hell, it's not your fault sweet little guy, nothing you've ever been duped into is your fault. But really, it's a fine fidget activity, better than yours. I won't recommend it, as you couldn't learn how.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

    I think the amazing thing about redditors is you actually believe coming at people with ignorant jackassery is a contribution

    Right back at ya buddy. I'm sure the people of Palestine are eternally grateful for your incredible contribution of "vagueposting so you can screenshot comments from people not knowing the full context about the person in question." That totally isn't terminally online, unhinged redditor jackassery.

    If you actually cared about anything you claimed to, you wouldn't be playing these ridiculous games. When a person asked for sources regarding rape allegations, you would provide them, and if you were acting in good faith you would consider someone a rape apologist if they apologized for someone knowing that there were credible allegations. But you're only here for the screenshots. Even if said screenshots come from people simply not knowing the full context of this one random guy that nobody's heard of, because their knowledge comes from you internationally misleading them.

    Between this ridiculous baitposting vs. soliciting nudes, it's hard to say which is less productive, more masturbatory, and less related to advancing any sort of political cause.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] [S] -6 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Oh no, what is Palestine going to do without Lemmy? You're so right

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Oh no, what is Palestine going to do if you don't jerk yourself off over screenshots from Lemmy? You're so right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] -3 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    And where did I claim this thread was for saving Palestine, rather than my own amusement at your expense, Mr. Objection? There doesn't seem to be a rule against making a fool out of you people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Well, let's see. I said it was a bait post and you seemed to have a problem with that characterization. If you're admitting that the whole point of the thread is trolling then I really don't have anything else to say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] -3 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    Not everything that causes you to show your whole ass of your own damn volition is bait. I think you are elevating this thread by calling it bait, which is a time-honored internet tradition. This is just how I speak to people who have no information to trade with me.

    You never had anything to say, my friend. Just "no no no! you have to do what I say!" Or what? I'll lose your respect? What part do you play in the class struggle, being a reply guy?

    Nothing. To. Offer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] [S] -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    The settler liberal weeps after spamming to no avail

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Sorry. I didn't mean to make you cry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] -3 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Well, I won't beg you to cry for what you've done to Palestine, but could you clarify what country you live in and what your political affiliation actually is before squirting out "I know what you are, but what am I?" 🤣

    I can smell it on you. You've spent the past three years hoping that voting and protests would counterbalance your tacit support for the genocide. These are the people who rape, distract, and kill for you. Of course you defend them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Well, I won’t beg you to cry for what you’ve done to Palestine

    What the fuck did I do to Palestine?

    but could you clarify what country you live in and what your political affiliation actually is before squirting out “I know what you are, but what am I?” 🤣

    Maybe that's something you should have checked before throwing around random insults.

    I am an American Marxist-Leninist who voted for PSL as the only party that supported ending the genocide in Gaza. If you check my post history, you can see me advocating that position going back years.

    I can smell it on you. You’ve spent the past three years hoping that voting and protests would counterbalance your tacit support for the genocide.

    How did I "tacitly support genocide," exactly?

    You "smell it on" everyone, because you just automatically assume everyone is your enemy. That's my whole point. You have to make your case earnestly and give people the chance to agree with you before you start berating them, assuming malice, and trying to trick them into humiliating screenshots.

    This is just wrecker behavior, and if you're not a fed, they owe you a paycheck.

    These are the people who rape, distract, and kill for you. Of course you defend them.

    I still don't know anything about this Berger guy. Are you claiming he's killed people on my behalf? If so, it's the first I've heard of it.

    Also, I haven't said a single word in his defense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Like I sincerely wish you luck creating higher comedy than Geneva saying "nobody condones this or takes him seriously" about a guy who hasn't been disavowed by any of these "activist" groups, fifteen people immediately saying "I condone him and take him seriously", followed by somebody claiming they can't find any stories about him on Microsoft's version of Google.

    Wow, it's almost like the only people who care about it are Palestinian journalists you don't follow. Three years in. Three years you've been killing them, and you won't even listen. There is no more pathetic excuse for a human being than the KKKommon leftoid

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    The thrashing these guys are doing to defend general sexism under a guise of “you’re anti sex and actually I’m a feminist for being okay with naked woman” is astonishing. And very sad… Casual Sexism & Rape culture is huge in the online left it seems

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    To be clear, I didn't say a single thing about the guy in the post or anything remotely similar to the strawman position you described. I don't even know who this guy is. My problem is with OP acting blatantly in bad faith, saying that he's just trying to get screenshots of people defending him while deliberately avoiding mention of the context of rape allegations that would likely make these users not defend him.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    So that's hardcore secular puritansim with a side of word salad. Got it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (5 children)

    Do you even know what secular means? How is this secular or puritan?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    It's puritan because it equates sexual desire with evil, unconditionally. It's secular because puritanism is usually associated with protestantism, but in this case it finds its way through some kind of political moralism that is only indirectly connected with the pervasive puritanism in the American society

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago*

    But that’s the thing I’m not equating sexual desire with evil. I never said he was evil for being horny, or evil at all. I said he’s a pig because he’s acting like a pig. That’s also not what secular means.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Humans are animals but we usually wear clothes when in public spaces. There is a difference between having desires and acting on them in a way that would make others uncomfortable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] [S] -12 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Oh wait, I forgot the magic analogy that unlocks common sense in the liberal mind: "Hey guys, I'm going to auschwitz, can you send me some hole pics, no boys!! 🙈 the journey is making my loins stir. so many crunchy bloohares around me aoooough"

    I may not be a huge Greta fan but come on be a little more protective of your libs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    So many people just itching to reveal they can’t be normal about women. I seriously hope people in here don’t post stuff like this acting like it’s normal. I’m gonna stop replying to these weirdos probably for my own good. The reaction to this is making me sick.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Women are discussed by this type of pics men send. So i was thinking its something men appreciate. But i see Even men don't want to see 🍆😅🤣

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    Why people in this comment section so sexist? This is a blatant objectification of women, he is prioritising their sexual characteristic over the fact that they are human beings. You don't see women posting things like this. How is there nothing wrong with asking strangers to send vulnerable pictures of their naked bodies?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    I'm not sure what you mean by that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Asking for nudes as being intrinsically sexist and objectifying is something that makes sense only in the American liberal middle-class discourse and mores. Outside, this stuff is a non sequitur.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I don't understand why, can you explain. Also I am neither American nor liberal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Because it's a normal, common interaction among humans, not particularly charged politically if there's no power relationship between the two people. This guy is not asking for nudes to an intern, for instance.

    Public exhibition of sexual desire is acceptable in most contexts. If there's a topic of sexism, it is in the fact that men doing this is more acceptable than women doing it, but this should be addressed by removing the stigma from women doing it rather than adding stigma to men doing it.

    But more generally, the policing of celebrities personal behavior to conform to strong social mores is a mostly protestant thing. In other cultures, especially before modernity or globalization, fame allowed you exactly to escape the commonplace social mores because you were outside of the community. Taking celebrities as role models and therefore asking them for moral behavior is a very American thing to do, even though after WW2 this system has been pushed throughout the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Uh I'm not American but I still think ASKING women for nudes is pathetic and creepy. Do you actually do that?

    Not receiving nudes. Asking for them is the weird part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Pathetic maybe, but being pathetic is still not wrong. Creepy I wouldn't say so. Creepy implies an indirectness and second motives: here he's being very direct and his motives are clear.

    I don't ask for nudes, because I have no particular interest in nudes and I prefer when they are sent spontaneously. But I deliberately post horny memes on main, where I have professional contacts, to fight against cringe culture and sex-negativity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Uh I'm not American but I still think ASKING women for nudes is pathetic and creepy

    You might not be American, but you're puritanical enough to fit right in in Salt Lake City. The only thing pathetic is being so sexist as to view sharing nudes as diminishing the woman who shared them somehow, which is the only way in which you could see it as demeaning to ask for nudes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -1 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [+] -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I don't watch TikTok lol this is my own opinion. Heterosexual sex is not evil either, that's hardly what I said! This person is clearly prioritising women's bodies for their sexual characteristics over their humanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago

    That's not clear at all. And the fact that you see that here says plenty about you, none of it good. If you believe asking for nudes is

    prioritising women's bodies for their sexual characteristics over their humanity.

    then as a corollary you must also believe that sending nudes dehumanizes a woman, otherwise the premise makes no sense.

    All modesty taboos, sexual purity/virginity fetishism and related beliefs are derived from values systems that see women as property. You simply cannot separate the two. And if you stop to actually think about why you believe what you believe, that kind of thinking can't hold up if you don't also fundamentally see women as property. His asking for nudes is only outrageous if he's asking women to devalue themselves somehow. If that's not the case. Then he's crass, maybe out of line with the generally expected dignity of the task he's set about, but he's not being "creepy", "entitled", "predatory", or any of the other things that are being thrown around in here.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 8 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    People should send nude pictures to people who take action against the Zionist ethnostate.

    What’s the problem here?

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    No, but you don't understand! He's being sexual! And he's a cishet man! That automatically makes him a predator and a much bigger problem than the Zionism he's actively opposing!!

    And since OP refused to elaborate on context that's the only conclusion I can draw as to what their problem here is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago* (9 children)

    I mean… just being a normal guy here, it’s kinda gross no? Even as a “joke”, it’s kinda gross. Not even kinda, it’s just gross. I think OP was more concerned about the responsibility public figures have and calling him out for being weird like this is totally valid. We should be holding people accountable for things not shielding him because he’s on a flotilla. Even if he’s not a grifter other people should be telling him to shape up. I’ve seen crass YouTubers do this flotilla thing and they weren’t gross or never allegations from Palestinian Americans that he fetishizes the people he wants to “help”…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Hold him accountable for what, exactly? What's gross about it? He's an adult man asking adult women to send him nudes. He's not badgering anyone, nothing about the post fetishized anyone, and he's not sending nudes unsolicited. So what's "gross"? Just the fact that a cishet dude is horny posting on main? Like, genuinely, if that's not the objection, then what is?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    You aren’t entitled to women’s bodies just because you “cast a wide net” and you do activism. Women are valid for calling this act sexist, childish, objectifying behavior.

    He should specifically be held accountable for being a pig, just as you are being for defending him. Seriously what is wrong with you guys? Too much Chapo?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    You aren’t entitled to women’s bodies

    Asking isn't entitlement. Demanding might be, but asking absolutely never is.

    But you aren't entitled to a sexless, sterile, boring world just because you've rotted your brain away with TikTok level gen Z pseudofeminism. Most adults enjoy sex, and will even talk about it occasionally. That's not predator behavior, even if it's a straight dude doing it. Fuck all the way off with your bullshit puritanism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    You think I want a sexless future because you’re being a fucking pig? Western men are truly all the same, y'all can’t even face criticism for your sexist opinions online without resorting to telling me I believe things that I don’t.

    All of a sudden telling other men to act normal is me saying I don’t like sex and women and men can’t be horny, you guys have seriously twisted world views of you think Jacob’s post is OK but women calling him gross isn’t. Tell me, why aren’t you arguing with the women in this thread who don’t appreciate your pig comments, are they also anti-sex puritans?

    Women aren’t your objects. Asking women randomly to send their titties and pussy pics is absolutely entitled. The fact you see it as “Just asking” is so dumb.

    Insult me all you want you are not entitled to seeing anyone’s body and I sincerely hope no stupid women fall for your (or this actors) weird behavior. Don’t send these gross fuckers any pictures of yourselves ladies they’ll probably end up online

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    You think I want a sexless future because you’re being a fucking pig?

    I know you're at the very least on the side of the people who want a sexless future because you think I'm a pig for saying there's nothing wrong with asking for casual/meaningless sexual activity as long as you take no for an answer and don't bother someone who's made it clear they aren't interested.

    And that's all I need to know to know you're 100% wrong about this subject. Tbh, you're pretty fucking based on everything else I've ever seen you engage with on Lemmy, but you're not even in the same ballpark as right on this. Saying that any public expression of horniness by a straight dude is inherently entitled and predatory (and that's what you're doing here, whether you want to accept it or not) is reactionary AF. You're defending bourgeois sexual mores originally created to maximize the price bronze aged goat fuckers could get for selling their preteen daughters to middle aged men. There is no version of purity culture that's compatible with a world free of domination systems.

    From other comments I gather he has done things that are genuinely bad, so call him out for that. Make sure everyone contemplating sending him nudes knows who they're sending them to. But don't pretend him asking for nudes is in the same category of behavior. That's not only fucked up, it's counter-revolutionary.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    Hold him accountable for being sexist. defending this in this way just says more about you than you realize.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    So, to be absolutely clear: you believe a blanket invitation to women to send nudes is sexist?

    Edit: nevermind. You answered that very clearly in another reply

    You are a fucking child and your opinion is worth less then the dog shit I scraped off my boots this morning. There is nothing. Inherently sexist about horniness, even when it's a cishet man being horny. Fuck your stupid puritan ideals and the sexless future you want to create.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah because I call out a pig being a gross pig, I want a sexless future. Literal child thinking. You may think you aren’t acting like a fucking dog but you are. It’s okay it just shows me how most other men deal with their sexual feelings. Go and sexualize more women and call me a puritan lmfao.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] -3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Taking action? 😭 it's a fucking boat tour where they got arrested on purpose to make a point. You are a slave.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I also do not believe the effectiveness of the flotillas will be in their quantity of delivered aid or successful landings, however I see the value of raising the Red Cross/Crescent and sailing towards a war zone with the declared intent and cargo in preparation to disperse aid to force the idf to stop you.

    That action (and it is action) makes clear to any observer that the intent of the zionists is genocide.

    I’m not familiar with the person you’re posting about but military detention by the idf is not the same as being arrested and I’m not sure what you can possibly be trying to accomplish rhetorically by equating the two.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    Yes they are making a point which is that israel is kidnapping them in international water and block them from entering Palestinian territories so israel continue to weaponize aids to achieve their colonial goals

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    This is unacceptable but it is also unacceptable to delegitimate all activist putting their body in the front to help a sieged population

  • source