all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 29 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I'm pretty sure I wouldn't use the WWW, or would severely cut back on the amount of use, if I had to suffer advertising to do so.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Other browsers have pretty good ad blockers. I genuinely don't know if I would be able to tell the difference between uBlock Origin on Firefox and uBlock Origin Lite on Chrome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I can tell the difference and I can't stand it tbh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago*

    Seems pretty logical to me, given the fact that it's the only major browser not built on the engine that banned the underlying API ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    They can take uBlock from my cold dead hands.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 399 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    28 comments in c/firefox@lemmy.ml view that post
    6 comments in c/technology@beehaw.org view that post
    4 comments in c/pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub view that post
    3 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post