Low rating (feddit.dk)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
πŸ™ 1
 

top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 143 points 2 months ago (46 children)

Gotta love the footies. They're harmless and locked in. At the rabbit hole that is sexual fetishes, they just hang around the entrance... looking down.

I don't think about feet at all, until a story like this pops up.

  • source
  • hideshow 46 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 2 months ago (35 children)

    You perfectly summed up footies, normies love to bug them for the weirdness but honestly, pretty wholesome all told.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 35 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    I think we must have had very different experiences in life. I think the only fetish I ever hear about in the news in a 'bad way' is feet.

    In the past two or three decades, I want to say there have been at least one or two stories per year about some cop in the area letting people off of tickets if they'll let the officer lick their feet. We have incredibly large furry conventions, anime conventions, tattoo conventions, reptile owner conventions, and probably more that touch on various kinks and fetishes, but you never hear about any of those sexual shenanigans in the news... so feet fetish folks finding themselves featured on frontline feeds frequently from the news is quite the contrast.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Letting people off the hook in exchange for foot stuff an entirely different problem. I think the focus misplaced.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Yeah, that's an ACAB problem more than a footsie problem. This is a mathematical function that always resolve to the same constant : let police(x) a function that describes an action (x) that is done by multiple officers over many iterations, and we can say that police(x)= bastardry

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    What does a ticket cost? I'd let any1 lick my smelly feet for 20 bucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I haven't gotten a ticket in years, but I think the absolute cheapest tickets are over $100, speeding will be somewhere between $180-300 depending on how much over you were going, and the really big boys like repeated no insurance or passing school busses can climb to $500-1000.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I had a speeding ticket I couldn't talk my way out of, what got dismissed because it was for 2 over the speed limit. Also dismissed tickets for not having insurance (apparently the card the insurance company sends you is not proof of insurance in Texas, at least according to this shitass I dealt with).

    Even though the tickets were dismissed, I still had to pay court fees. Which were for twice what the tickets were.

    Hence the saying, you can beat the charge but you can't beat the ride.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    apparently the card the insurance company sends you is not proof of insurance in Texas,

    The fuck? How the hell is that not proof?

    Also, as someone who has also had to pay court fees over bullshit, it's freaking ridiculous how our society lets that sort of thing happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    When i was in college, there were reports of people, who took their shoes off at the library while studying for midterms, putting their foot back in to find them filled with jizz.

    It happened enough we got a campus wide email that said to not take your shoes off in public spaces lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Well, there was Rainfurrest, which was so bad that I know the name off the top of my head without even being in the furry scene. From what I've heard it was an outlier organized by people who'd been banned from other conventions so by no means typical.

    But it's not like I've never heard of a furry convention going wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Oh yeah there are a ton of bdsm conventions, major cities will often have multiple a year. And there are issues and drama for certain, but we generally try to police our own and our problems tend towards being that well established members of the community who do a lot sometimes utilize the trust and respect they have to be predatory, especially to new people, just like every other community.

    Foot fetishists' misbehavior is the stuff like you described, though they're really outshone in awfulness by body type fetishists, who do the same stuff and so much more

    And tbh I think foot fetishists' big problem is their misbehavior comes from the shame and awkwardness they have about it. And i bet you can find similar stories with far more common body part fetishes like breasts and butts. Like, I'm a breast fetishist for sure and don't get the appeal of feet, but I know some folks who are all about feet and are totally respectful people and I know plenty of folks who can't act properly about tits.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    I don't yuk anyone's yum except for furries. That shit is weird

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    On the one hand, I agree, furries don't make a lot of sense.

    On the other hand, I'd totally fuck a dragon. Assuming we could figure out the logistics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Furries suddenly made a lot of sense to me when someone told me a lot of them are surgeons.

    I think I'd find regular Humans pretty repulsive after cutting them open and watching them die and cutting out massive tumours and shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Like animals are less repulsive after cut open

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    I mean, the word Β«fetishΒ» itself is named after feet, so they’re literally the OG.

    Looks like I was misinformed about that!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Going to acktually on you here but...

    It began as:

    "material object regarded with awe as having mysterious powers or being the representative of a deity that may be worshipped through it," 1610s, fatisso, from Portuguese feitiΓ§o "charm, sorcery, allurement," noun use of an adjective meaning "artificial."

    which eventually morphed into:

    Figurative sense of "something irrationally revered, object of blind devotion" appears to be an extension made by the New England Transcendentalists (1837). For sexual sense (1897), see fetishism.

    Which...checks out in terms of our current understandings of the word. (But still is used as an object in magic in other circles). Which, if referring to a foot as an object of obsession...definitely "more" valid than saying "furry fetish" which is more of a "kink".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    In the sexual sense a fetish is delineated from a kink in that with a fetish it's often considered necessary for attraction/sexual satisfaction to the haver. So strictly a person with a sadomasochism fetish can't get off without receiving or administering pain, whereas a person with a sadomasochism kink will sexually enjoy it, but can also get off from vanilla sex.

    But they're often used interchangeably. Also within bdsm kinks can be nonsexual, with some folks not getting off on it, but still enjoying it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 63 points 2 months ago

    Foot for thought

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I do not understand humans

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    And capable of being turned on by anything. Not much more to understand than that lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Modern humans waste 99% of their lives trying to explain away the simple fact that humans are biologically designed to sleep, eat, and fuck(with hope that it leads to reproduction).

    Biology gives no fucks about our feelings, respect, or anything else.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    My take on feets: I don't think about them in my fantasies or anything, but if they're there IRL, they represent a further opportunity to add to the other person's pleasure, so I'll have a go on them. But I don't get turned on by the act of licking soles in and of itself. I've never seen a pair of feet and thought "daaaaaaaaaaamn, those are some HOT feets!" no more than I've seen a garden fence and thought "burn down all other fences, 'cause THIS is the one!" Although, I'm sure I've seen plenty of feet that caused my neutrality to dip into disgust (like my own, for example). But beyond that, I don't think about them at all. They're just an extra button on my controller in the indecipherable non-localised Slavic RPG that is the female orgasm.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Never have my thoughts been written down so accurately as right now 🀝. I can understand many other fetishes. Feet I just really struggle to comprehend. Not that that matters, more power to the foot fetishers etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    as far as I'm concerned, foot fetishists are the bravest people on earth

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 2 months ago (20 children)

    Another poster said the commentor is talking about a youtuber named gabi belle, who afaik posts ZERO sexual content and even if she did that still wouldnt make her an object for your personal sexual satisfaction.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    No you don't understand she's a woman showing her face therefore she's a sex object

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Anyone inherently is a sex object

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    The commenter said she posted that she wanted her score on the foot rating site to be higher, which seems like pretty clear consent to objectify her feet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Having watched Gabi, it was almost certainly a pretty obvious joke. Not surprising she blurred them, people are disgusting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Eh, not sure "obvious joke" describes it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Hate how you're so upvoted because not only is your information third or fourth hand depending on perspective, you also outright believe it and knit your idea of consent around such weak thread.

    She's joking, if anything this is a defeatist joke around the fact that she is nearly powerless when it cones to being objectified and sexualized without her consent, and the dark humor on display is very on brand. So the screenshotted comment, presumably a viewer of hers, should be familiar with her style of comedy and her struggles with being objectified and her likeness being misused.

    So that comment is by someone who either does the exact thing to her that she doesn't want, or they are genuinely so porn pilled that they genuinely haven't ever picked up on what she's talking about and are only there to objectify and sexualize her.

    I would not have bothered to comment unless I knew enough about her, her content and the thoughts she shared surrounding these things, I suggest we all adopt this approach in the future.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Uh, I posted her original tweet, literally first hand information.

    You can argue that it's a joke, but when you literally go online and say "Please rate my feet higher", you can't be surprised when people take you at face value and do the thing you specifically asked for.

    When you make a post in a public space, you can't expect everyone to know your lore. For example, my wife is a brown immigrant and I'll make racist jokes to her about her ethnicity, which she laughs at because she knows I'm not racist and I'm punching at racism itself, not her race. But if I post those same jokes in public, people will assume I'm racist because they don't have the context my wife does.

    If she made the joke in the middle of a stream with context, you'd have a point. But she didn't, she made a standalone tweet, and even said "Please". That reads as pretty unambiguous consent.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I... don't get it. Explain the joke?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Whenever I think of foot fetishists I think of the anime character Rin Tohsaka, because of her name.

    "Watch your piggies, Rin Toe Sucker is coming!"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    So grateful not to be afflicted with this.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Who is this person talking about?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I just googled to figure it out. It was a YouTuber named Gabi Belle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago
    [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    When’s his next movie anyway? Once Upon A Time… was pre-COVID.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I watched End of Oak Street last night. Even though the characters learned that they are kinda trapped thier house, they all still kept their shoes and socks on. Found that interesting

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί