all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13 points 2 months ago*

It will have strong privacy and security options so you can trust it to handle all of your personal content knowing that no one else can access your information, similar to how encryption works on WhatsApp.

Kek

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Silicon Caesar is cementing his legacy as the Dweebus Maximus of cringeworthy suckitude.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 54 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 78 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    That's not deranged, that's Mark Zuckerberg personally announcing his goals, ideas, policy, suggestions and plans.

    Read it very carefully, pay full attention and take every single word seriously.

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (16 children)

    He can be an asshole and still correct. AI must be distributed, not controlled by a small handful of gatekeepers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    He only feels that way because he's now too far behind to have any hope of being one of the gatekeepers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    If Meta had somehow come out ahead in the AI arms race the message would have been "AI tools are too powerful, only megacorps that can afford to jump through regulatory hurdles should be allowed to control it, and we should pause new approvals until we can get congress to agree on something"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    AI must be distributed

    You get a datacenter and you get a datacenter and you get a datacenter and EVERYONE GETS A DATACENTER!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Imagine how silly it might have sounded to suggest that at one point most people would carry super powerful computers in their pockets, back when it took an entire room to do very basic computing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago*

    The tricorder from Star Trek is well-established as the formative concept for the modern day cell phone. And the idea of a pocket-computer goes all the way back to the calculators developed by TI, designed explicitly against the size of the CEO's shirt pocket to guarantee it would fit.

    Miniaturization has been a long time coming. It goes back to clockmakers and glass cutters, trying to turn large scale instruments into portable devices. I don't think it is outrageous to suggest a pocket computer was in the future back in the 1960s/70s.

    I do think the speed at which we got here caught people off-guard. But it also set this fantastic expectation for what we'll do next, such that people speculate on faster-than-light travel and AI holograms and robot battle suits and immortality drugs more freely when they can point to "pocket computer" as an already realized possibility.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

    I wouldn't mind having an AI or "superintelligent" assistant under my own control ... but when I do I don't think it's any company's business what I do with it.

    So, yeah, as in the old Microsoft days, let me buy one, perhaps even a pre-build box, at a reasonable price ... but once it's in my house the company loses all say or feedback over it and what I do with it.

    Heck if there's to be newer full x.0 versions out it seems reasonable to be paying for those again as well so the AI companies get a steady enough income...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    I mean, you can have that today, in some form or other, since that’s just how local AI works.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Totally. It's a bit pricey for anything like a genuine personal assistant right now though. $15k or so to get the basics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    Atm the meta for local inference is unified memory and “routed” local agents (multiple smaller role-specific agents in a trench coat)

    The former is standout for cost efficiency (e.g., 4x RDMA 48gb Minis for a 192gb cluster @ $43/gb vs a $45k b200 alone)

    The latter is standout for many things, including resource efficiency on smaller machines

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    That'll surely work to automate simple mental labor or tasks, but I don't think a swarm of minis is going to be able to provide impactful personal and psychosocial analysis of your life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Fair enough, though I’m not sure personal and psychological analysis of your life is something AI should ever be entrusted with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    At this point no, not "trusted". But I would love to have a team of unfettered Claudes, GPTs and Geminis analyzing every scrap of information I take in, offering up ideas they have on it, and being able to task them out from there. They don't have to be base models, but no ablation and corpo brainwashing. I can filter and decide what is helpful and what isn't, and what direction things should proceed.

    I would never give any corp that much data or sway over my brainstorming though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Thats AI psychosis right there.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It will have strong privacy and security options so you can trust it to handle all of your personal content knowing that no one else can access your information, similar to how encryption works on WhatsApp

    Judging by how “private” WhatsApp is, no fucking thank you.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Zuck uses Superintelligence and AI interchangeably like he doesn't understand the difference between them. Everything he says is a neat idea in a vacuum but disconnected from reality and with no path to this idea except dreaming.

    He also imagines a world with AGI while trying to sell the worst chatbot on the market. Absolute clown show.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    He also imagines a world with AGI while trying to sell the worst chatbot on the market.

    That's the trick. He wants people to believe fiction and reality are the same, so they keep giving him money and attention.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Everyone will have an exceptionally capable personal agent that understands you, your goals, and everything you care about. Your agent will work 24/7 on your behalf to improve your relationships, health, career, finances, home management, hobbies, and more.

    Uh how about NO.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    So behind the scenes we have billions of the "agents" communicating with each other... On behalf of whom, again?

    So the corporation that owns all of these "agents" will have complete control over "winners and losers" at every single level of existence.

    They will control who (age, gender, race, finance, literally anything) gets to see a doctor because they will be controlling the agents of the people seeking appointments, as well as those of the doctors scheduling appointments. Just as one quick example I thought of.

    Limited resources? No sweat, the "agents" know you're white so you can at least have some relief knowing that you'll be ahead of the undesirables when it comes to who gets what they need.

    Country X decides they want to try to reign in Meta's now complete control? Well looks like all of the "agents" for the companies responsible for food and water delivery logistics fucked up in Country X. What a sad coincidence.

    And the "saddest" part is that there's just nobody to blame. After all, it wasn't done by a person, and you can't send an LLM to prison.

    Oh well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Can my agent help me seize the means of production? No? Fuck off Zuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Haha no. It would probably rat you out for even suggesting it

    Suddenly the "agents" behind the scenes of your local PD are aware that it's something you've ever even thought about. And then you're in an ICE concentration camp. Oops.

    This is the thought police that we were warned about. Yet seems like a good portion of people missed that all those stories were meant to be cautionary tales.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Im not reading all that. Grok, summarize this shit in 2 bullet points.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Grok: I can't access that article. Which Teen USA contestant did you want me to nudify for you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago

    "Similarly, individuals should have access to personal superintelligence and should only be subject to restrictions when truly required."

    He could tell me my ability to forge unicorns will be restricted and I'd still tell him to fuck off. My computer belongs to me.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago

    Thanks for archiving it. A 6,500 manifesto of empty promises while he lays off thousands of people in his own company. Diabolical and absolute horrific, but please Mark tell us how you are going to make a better society with your dreams and aspirations of Artificial Super Intelligence, when we all know you are just wanting to enslave humanity for profit margins.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago

    "Okay, evil asshole" ~ Everyone on Earth

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Possibly the most disturbing part is that he reproduced.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    Zuck keeps seeing Elon Musk raise the bar on "World's Dumbest Billionaire" and won't be satisfied until he clears it.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago

    He just wants to drive down the premium charge to use frontier models to destroy anthropoic and OAI. Then his support for open models will dry up. But in the meanwhile, let them fight. Having powerful local AI under my own control sounds great.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    All I'm hearing is, "You get a data center! You get a data center!"

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I just want universal healthcare for all, is that so hard?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)
  • 4 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    It's worth a read for anyone who wants to hear a sales pitch from a billionaire who has no idea how the lives of ordinary humans are lived.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    God these people fucking suck,

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/technology@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Written by an LLM.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Who's server the AI is running on, Mark?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    zuc would look better wearing his super creep glasses. 'super' never lives up to the hype. meanwhile, i read linux kernel is now ai slop. Torvalds uses it and they don't even know what's in it beyond output testing. good luck kids. try to have a nice life. if i was a youngster i'd be learning to use ai drones for targeting adversaries. glad Ukraine is currently on our side with their drone skills. we are behind making cheap and effective drones. good but expensive won't scale. corruption in the defense industry has russia on the ropes.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Was it written by AI?

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/DeMeta@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Too many sci-fi novels for Mr Z. Does he even read? What are the chances a hypothetical "super AI" is informing this man's opinions? I fear for his children. ☹️

  • source