Interesting article from 2018. But nothing has changed at all. Even the electric cars I see on the road are huge.

all 13 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

At this point i don't even demand fewer cars, i just want smaller cars.

90% of people do not need a 4-seat gas-guzzler with a massive trunk which literally outsizes a WW1 tank and a top speed of "yes", they can get by perfectly fucking fine with a little electric moped-car where the rear seats are foldable and the trunk fits maybe 3 grocery bags.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    EVs weren't made to save the planet; they were made to save the car industry.

    Theyre an improvement surely but mass transit, cycle lanes, and better urban planning are fundamentally more important to emphasize.

    This article doesn't even touch on the fact that tires and brake dust still contribute to unhealthy air quality and adverse health outcomes.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    EVs do not wear breaks like a normal car. I keep having issues with mine needing to be cleaned and lubricated because they get such low usage.

    The tire thing is valid though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I wore like 2mm off my break pads in 60k miles. A nice win on car maintenance costs as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I had this with an 80s civic. It would shut gas off from the injectors when decelerating, and downshift hard. It meant the engine became an air pump, and car would slow without brakes. The brakes lasted so long I had to get a gear puller to pull the wheel rims off the hubs. They had corrosions bonded themselves together

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    This is how nearly all ICE cars have operated since the mid-90s. Most people just haven't learned to take advantage, and still drive full speed up to red lights and slam on the brakes at the last second.

    My original brake pads in my '17 Nissan Micra 5spd went 100k kms before failing inspection.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Not much use in saying we need fewer cars without questioning why we need so many.

    I would happily stop driving TO A FUCKING USELESS OFFICE and give up my car to do it.

    Want fewer cars, gotta work on the cause not the symptom. Shaming people for driving because they don't have a choice isn't useful.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Both is good. And smaller.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Porque no los dos

  • source
  • 26 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 27 points 3 months ago
    [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    countries like the UK, France, Italy and Germany there are now around 5 vehicles for every 10 people

    That's a weird way to say 1 car for every 2 people.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Provide better public options. It takes me 25 minutes to get to work by car and 75 minutes by public. Fuck that.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    Most likely I'll live the rest of my life not owning a car, using public transport, mainly.

    If most of the humans were decent I would be absolutely furious that people still use cars to get to work.

    Most humans are absolutely disgusting. Smoking right under the no smoking sign at the stop, blasting TikToks, shitty (or, in fairness, any kind of) music from their phone speakers, getting on the tube without a mask while coughing, sneezing at everyone in the crowded carriage, taking up two seats just because why not either by placing their stuff on the seat or just manspreading, having phone conversations on loudspeakers... I could go on forever.

    I will keep using public transport till I kick the bucket, but FUCK I totally understand everyone who prefers to have their own private space.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago
    [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    So many cities could be made completely car-free.

    Just force people to park near the edge and use alternative transport from there. This would give city centers the space to be greener and safer to live in.

    Especially in Europe this should be fairly easy. Some cities are pushing towards this too. Not sure if American cities are suited sadly enough, as many of them are built with cars in mind.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I say not less cars, but no cars. We need to move towards societies where we arent dependent on the asphalt industry.

    We need to learn how to live slow again.

    zero carz🦔

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Im curious what people here would take to work. A 20 minute drive or an hour bike ride. Buses don't exist near me nor will they. What are my options. It's too hot, the weather is unpredictable, and im not spending an hour one way to work.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    If you say there will never be buses near you, I presume you don't live in a city. If you did, I don't see why the city creating a bus line there wouldn't be possible.

    For folks commuting from outside the city to inside, the best is a big car park outside the city next to a commuter train station. Make it frequent and reliable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    In all honesty, I would probably drive in your situation, though I might invest in a folding bike/e-bike I can toss in the trunk. It's crazy how small those things are now! They had some Urtopias at the local bike shop last time I swung by, and I swear they fold up smaller than most adult scooters I've seen.

    Fwiw my commute is about 35 min by regular bike, 25 by e-bike, 15 by car if the traffic is light (that's a big if), or around 45 by bus. E-bike is my preferred option.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    A LOT of people would merrily choose the 1-hour bike ride provided they won't get murdered by car drivers.

    My aunt has both a car and access to perfectly reasonable bus routes, yet often choses to WALK multiple kilometers to work in the summer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Something i'm always annoyed by no one talking about: What about smaller cars?
    Just making the cars smaller is a really easy way to make them less shit in basically every single way, no matter what.

    Normalize moped cars.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Unless they're really small, like kei cars in Japan, and have different infrastructure to match, it doesn't do much good. They still take up the same amount of space in traffic because that's dominated by following distance rather than vehicle length, and they still take up the same amount of space at rest because all parking spaces are the same size.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    you do realize there are other factors than just the physical size they occupy, right? Smaller cars means they're lighter (less wear on roads, less fuel usage, less damage when they hit things) and have better visibility.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Reposting in same community deserves downvotes, at least mine.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -6 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    "Genghis Khan, who established the world's largest contiguous empire between the 13th and 14th centuries, has been branded the 'greenest invader' in history as his murderous invasion actually helped scrub about 700million tonnes of carbon from the atmosphere. According to a new research, the ruthless Mongol warrior killed so many people during his bloody invasions that huge swathes of cultivated land depopulated and returned to forest."

    https://www.wwf.org.co/en/?199285%2FGenghis-Khan---the-greenest-invader-in-history=

  • source
  • parent
  • 24 comments in c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Yes. I've been saying for years that electric cars and self driving cars are solving the wrong problem. The problem is if I need a car to get groceries. The problem is I'm not safe on the street because of all the cars.

    People who have never lived someplace that doesn't need a car are very eager to tell you how it won't work, though.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The roads here are so wide (usually 6 lanes plus turn lanes and a median) that we could build wall2wall apartments/condos/flats on on half of the road and still have enough road left for 3-4 lanes of traffic and a detached dedicated bike path and sidewalks.

    Cars take up way more space than people realize.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    streets like these really make you feel it in your bones, everything feels comfortable and spacious with like 500 people on the same street until 5 cars show up and suddenly there's a fucking traffic jam out of nowhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Public Transport for the win!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    As an electric car owner, I completely agree. We were lucky enough to go from 2 cars to 1, but still not enough transit to go to zero

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    I got tired of waiting for EVs to become affordable and got an e-bike instead. I still drive at times when the bike doesn't cut it for various reasons. And now my car is getting super old and in need of replacement, but I'm not sure what to do?

    EVs sound ideal, but the usual logic that the higher upfront cost will come back to you in fuel savings feels less compelling in my situation. Otoh another gas guzzler? One thing I can say is I don't see myself ever buying new again. It's just not worth it for how little I drive. I guess I'll leave EV/hybrid/conventional debate up to what's available on the used market.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    If you barely use your car, you might not even need it anymore. Perhaps a taxi/rental/car pooling might meet the few times you still take it out of the garage? Specially when you put the numbers down and see how expensive it is to maintain a car

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    You have a point. My brother gets by fine now without owning his own wheels. And my grownup kids don't even have drivers licences.

    I guess where my situation differs is that they live in big cities compared to me with all sorts of options for getting around. Also, I'm a part-time musician with a lot of gear I have to transport to gigs, particularly if I'm running sound.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Would you consider something like the Bestune Pony to be affordable? It retails for the equivalent of 8000 euros after 15% VAT. I am seeing it more and more and I live in a place where petrol is 0.50 euro a liter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    Well my wife is certainly fawning over it when I showed her photos!

    So unfortunately in North America, there is a 100% tariff on Chinese EVs which, oddly enough, predates Trump. In Canada specifically, they are easing this somewhat so that 49,000 will be allowed in every year before the tariff kicks in. (That number apparently reflects EV sales before the tariff was implemented.)

    But yes, I would definitely consider something like that if I could actually find one here.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    Of course, because EVs do not address the problem and just do a misdirection.

    The problem is publicly subsidised private vehicles.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    more trains and busses

  • source
  • [–] [S] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    When I was growing up, I was a sci-fi nerd. I loved the idea of cool little electric cars. But the ones I'm seeing around here are huge. We're also learning that even electric cars are fucking up the environment.

    What I didn't imagine is electric bikes and scooters. So that's been a cool thing (I have both), but it has downsides too.

    I volunteer at a local hospital, and we've seen a huge uptick of injuries from people riding electric scooters and bikes. The reason is that more people are on them, but our infrastructure in my city doesn't support them very well. So people are having to ride on busted sidewalks, roads with no bike lane, etc. So a lot of people crashing them (and not wearing a helmet).

    So I think the only we can really reduce car usage is to make the city unfriendly to cars. But that ain't gonna happen here anytime soon. A strip of road near me actually was finally updated with a pretty wide bike lane last month because it's close to a school, but holy shit, people in my neighborhood are still bitching about how we didn't need it and it was a waste of resources. smh

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -5 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    So, the fewer humans argument is popular in countries with a low population density, or generally in the first world where populations have peaked and are projected to decline if they are not doing so already. I'm in Canada. It's a big talking point here.

    When you study demographics, though, you start getting a different picture. 1st worlders have a HUGE per capita resource footprint compared to 3rd worlders. Like 10x or more. Our 40 million punches like 400 million in the developing world, which is not something to be proud of.

    The point I'm trying to make is that anything we do in wealthier countries that reduces per capita consumption has an outsized effect globally. A car is over 10x more massive than a bike, and the costs reflect that however you measure it, be it in energy, manufacturing, infrastructure, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 3 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    The big problem with this transition is not whether we need fewer cars but that modern cities are not designed for alternatives. Any near term solution has to include EVs. It’s going to take a large redesign and investment at a time we can’t wait while we need to electrify everything.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Modern Australian cities too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    ironically australia is generally a great example of how easily american cities could unfuck themselves by just running trains on the railways they already have and building apartments near the train stations.

    Like yeah brisbane isn't a paradise by any stretch, but remarkably it's not an endless hellscape of highways and single family houses! You can get a train to the airport! There's an actual downtown rather than a sea of parking lots with 7 shops!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    It’s the suburban sprawl that is driving the car based transport. Suburbs are established further away with no proper infrastructure, shops and facilities. Cars are the only way to get about as everything is so hard to get to. Extending freeways to them doesn’t help as the commute time is lowest in a car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    But 1) apartments don't tend to be built in suburban sprawl, and 2) even the worst suburban sprawl in europe is still generally bikeable, there'll be a lidl or something within a reasonable distance.

    Got this thread mixed up with another, similar one. Ignore this reply lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    I was passing through the back blocks of Sydney, new suburbs that are a long way from anywhere. If you want to go anywhere it’s by car.

    Infill of the inner areas especially around railways is happening which is great but the sprawl continues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    but are poor people really living in the suburban sprawl? I'm not debating whether the sprawl forces you to drive, my point is that suburbs are for rich people.

    i just realized this is not the thread i thought it was, whoops

  • source
  • parent