After staring at the tiles for 30 seconds I found the pattern (4 aligned rows followed by an offset row), but.. why the hell would you lay these out like that? It looks so jumbled.

all 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 87 points 3 months ago (12 children)

This is done intentionally, and repeats further throughout the installation. The main reason is it prevents long runs of grout lines. The installation will be stronger, and there’s no need for an expansion joint. Additionally, it’s harder to see if the grout joint shifts one direction or the other over a long run.

I don’t think it need to be done every fifth tile though- that’s a design choice by the installer.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    It can also be the same reason the carpet patterns in casinos is a bit off, designed to irritate slightly so your head stays up and you focus on the stores more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (7 children)

    have u considered maybe some things in life simple and not a conspiracy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    You also think supermarkets don't use the layout to manipulate you, hmm?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    good god you conspiracy theorists are insufferable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The every fifth tile is what I have an issue with, tiles laid out at half-intervals or quarter-intervals on every row are common and perfectly fine. The chunk of 4 aligned tiles is very unpleasant to look at imo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    i dunno, look at something else?

    many things in life are worth outrage. no need to go invent something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 3 months ago

    Well, I wouldn't say I'm outraged by it, given the community I posted it in. I'm not foaming at the mouth, I find the arrangement unpleasant and unnecessarily odd. Am I not allowed to think so?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (5 children)
  • [+] [S] -7 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Person A is fine with a given tessellation. Person B hates it.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tessellation

    Now I'm kind of curious whether people have radically different preferences on the aesthetic appeal of different tessellations. I kind of always vaguely assumed that people tended to more-or-less find the same things appealing.

    I'm kind of a sucker for hexagonal Spanish Revival terracotta tiles, but I lived near some places that used them, so maybe that's specific to me. I have pleasant memories of walking on bare feet over shaded patios with them. Also, they aren't the easiest thing to clean or the best thing to hide dirt or avoid damage (you can crack 'em). Or the cheapest.

    1000009446

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 18 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I find it interesting that the post itself has mostly upvotes, yet every comment I've made explaining why I don't like it is downvoted

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The only thing I can think of is, maybe there used to be displays or kiosks there, and this actually created an illusion of uniformity when The offset rows were obstructed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    This looks like the intentional break of a line pattern that prevents an MC Escher type of line illusion, the kind that makes people dizzy. And it appears that it's aligned between store fronts.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Idk I like it. I wish the every 5th row was a different color at least tho

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Maybe without such a pattern it become one big of the same thing. All lines are connected. And you might no longer see depth very well and get nauseous.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    This might have been done to allow "get right" points. If this is down a long aisle or corridor that wasnt built perfectly straight or parrallel(or various other reasons), the break in the pattern allows for adjustments that would otherwise be highly visible if it was one continuous pattern.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] -1 points 3 months ago

    The pattern doesn't go on for terribly long (you can see a break in the pattern towards the left of the photo, where there is actually a set of 3 aligned rows instead of 4).

    They could have accomplished the same thing in a more uniform way by placing the tiles in the standard half-interval or quarter-interval pattern across all of them. The only thing that makes any sense to me is that it's quicker/ faster to align the tiles than it is to offset them, but they couldn't have them aligned the whole way for the reasons you outlined.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    This bothers me in a way flooring doesn't usually.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    It's a path, you need to follow it to discover a new dimension.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    This is an airport, isn't it?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    My best guess: They had to do some work below the tiles in that section and just filled out in close enough.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment