top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 201 points 3 months ago (32 children)

I have never understood the need to comment on porn of any kind.

  • source
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 154 points 3 months ago (16 children)

    You probably also guessed that the stripper isn't actually attracted to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 90 points 3 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] 50 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    Sorry you had to find out this way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    But the escort actually likes me, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Instructions unclear. My ford escort definitely hates me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I made her a loaf of sourdough bread and now I know her real name and home address. Did I mess up?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Idk depends on your next move methinks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I don't need attraction, just the illusion thereof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 43 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I've seen some funny comments, but the ones that are like "ur so hot" are baffling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Also the "if you had to pick one" ones. Like it's a public forum and those are real people. Like I get the whole fantasy and thinking about which one you are most attracted to, but any kind of bonding with others around porn (that isn't just having sex while watching porn) just seems pathetic to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 34 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    It's a parasocial dopamine hit. It's like commenting on a Twitch stream. There's a fantasy that they'll notice and reply to you, and suddenly you'll be having a conversation with a famous attractive person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    I commented on one porn post here on Lemmy where the person was trying to look way too young. I commented in a reply to another comment that was saying it's kind of disgusting and wrong, because the intent is clear that they were trying to at least appear like a child. It doesn't really matter if they're actually of-age. It's like anime with the thousand year old dragon gir thing. If you're trying to create something erotic/pornographic while appearing like a child, that content doesn't need to exist.

    That is I think the only time I've posted on porn.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 80 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [+] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 110 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Fucking duh. They also can't tell they are being gaslit by bots on all their stupid conservative pages. Boomers are fucking stupid.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

    Kinda wishin I knew what a thirst trap was..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Good-looking person, usually dressed and/or posing provocatively. Often includes engagement-bait-type caption.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 3 months ago
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (-1 children)

    Yes, but the line of thinking originates there, and they were programmed to be more hateful and stupid than they ever would have been in a pre-zuck era.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow -1 child comments
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
    [–] 45 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    And it'll happen to you, too!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Are we sure all these boomers leaving comments aren’t also bots on Facebook?

    They might be there to get the thirst traps traction to get out on all the old creeper’s algorithms in the first place.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    A trick Reddit was pioneering all the way back in the late '00s. Drive engagement by using bots to fake engagement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    AI/bots creating content. AI/bots leaving comments.

    Wait I’ve heard about this… 😟

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Our university's IT team actually pushed for this last year. AI to generate assignments... students get their own AI to do the assignments... then back to faculty AI to grade andngive feedback... all built into Blackboard and Canvas...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    in a sense.. I know some people like this

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    The solution? Flood Facebook with AI generated boomers and let the bot system implode and take facebook down with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The AI generated boomers are all commenting on political posts and telling us why lefties are wrong and global warming isn't real.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    I like to respond to that with posts about how many people have died of heat stroke recently and make comments about how they're all really old. That usually gets their goat because they know climate change is real they just don't want to admit it because that would require them to take some responsibility.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    I ran into a Discord where the sole topic was running hot girl "AI influencers" on Instagram. Literally hundreds of thousands of people thirsted over them, and the operaters made real money.

    Their systems were pretty sophisticated. The whole process is automated; LLMs write the posts and do sexy DMs, imagegen and videogen models and such do the sexy images and videos, controlnet keeps the look consistent-enough between media. LLM agents press all the buttons. I think there may have even been OnlyFans stuff.

    So a single operator could run dozens of bots.

    ...It's not hard for these models, either. DMs and short Insta posts are stupidly simple language, and media of sexy people in clothes, doing insta-style poses, probably makes up most of the image/video model training corpus.

    I think there was some engagement farming with other bots, of course, but it would snowball and turn organic. Real Instagram users were thirsting over these bots.


    ...It got me thinking.

    Is it really that different from a parasocial relationship with a "real" influencer?

    I mean, functionally, its exactly the same. The users can't even tell the difference.


    I posit that the whole "thirst" influencer system was broken and exploitive to everyone involved, except Facebook.

    It was fucked up to begin with.

    AI just made it more obvious to onlookers. It destroyed the pretense that any of it was "real."

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    What a lot of people fail to realize is that the whole industry is based on selling a fantasy. It's no different then getting the girl friend experience from a prostitute. I don't think there's a meaningful difference between a real person and an AI in these industries.

    IMO it's only a problem when the customer doesn't understand that they're buying an illusion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    IMO it’s only a problem when the customer doesn’t understand that they’re buying an illusion.

    +1. But I wonder how many know it’s an illusion.

    I’m the wrong person to analyze this though, as I do not get why people engage in these services. Like, I get roleplaying, I’ve daydreamed or even written out long fantasies, but why would I (for example) pay for some girl to talk it out on the phone?

    …Much less gawk at some influencer on Insta?

    What’s the point?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago

    They've been doing it long before AI images too. Most photoshops got them too.

  • source
  • [–] 113 points 3 months ago* (18 children)

    Back in 2023, we reported on AI-generated influencers that were pulling thousands of reactions per thirst trap on Instagram.

    Anything but the metric system!

    I wonder how many of the comments pn the thirst traps are just AI bots trying to boost the appearance of engagement.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 79 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Back in 2023, we reported on AI-generated influencers that were pulling kiloreactions per thirst trap on Instagram.

    Is that better?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    The internet is just bots talking to each other! Are you a bot? Am I a bot? Who knows?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Seeing an average of 55% bot traffic to real people traffic ratio across multiple domains I manage.

    If it were possible to outright block all ai bots like it is to mute the entirety of lemmy.ml, I would sincerely do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I think the bigger issue is 65+ guys perving on girls young enough to be their daughters. Old guys who think they are still 25 and have game.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    My father has been very insistent on having a health insurance plan that could have a spouse added because he is sure one of the thirst traps he sends gift cards to is going to marry him. My sister had to have a conversation with him about not looking at nudes on his phone while visiting his grandkids.

    Ugh. The only consolation my sister and I have is that at least no actual young women are being harassed by him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I watched the three video clips and would not have initially guessed the leotard gymnast and the mechanic are generated. The sad gymnast looks a little plastic.

    What actually looks fake in the mechanic video after a couple loops is the valve notches on the pistons, which are rotated from the correct orientation, and overlapping in a way that the laws of physics would not support.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah they pass at a glance. But if you look around at all, the account has uploaded that video 14 times, and there's no evidence of actual mechanic work. No grease or tools in the video, not even a vehicle. And the video stability doesn't match with someone holding up a phone like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    And the video stability doesn’t match with someone holding up a phone like that.

    Image stabilization can be pretty good lately, but I must admit that I don't spend much time watching handheld phone selfie videos.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›