all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 32 points 3 months ago

“Free beer, all day long the day he dies,” the post said. “Show us this post when it happens in a few months and we’ll make good on that promise.” The post was later updated to clarify, “we meant the Madison Taproom because that’s open all year, if he dies in the summer, then it’s gonna be the Minocqua Taproom.”

After shots were fired while Trump was present at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in April, the brewery’s Facebook said, “Well, we almost got #freebeerday.”

That one "waow based" meme

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Very poor article. Fuck Trump, hope he dies tomorrow. But I'm also not willing to give a business owner an automatic pass just because they're on my side.

    No where in this article do they actually list WHY their alcohol permit is being revoked. What exactly are they being accused of? Because I could absolutely see some slimy owner with a rat-infested kitchen latching onto politics as a means of shielding their crooked operation. "I'm innocent, they're just trying to silence me!"

    Is it possible this is politically motivated? Sure. But the fact that they never actually list the specific reasons why the permit is revoked is damning.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    https://www.wpr.org/news/state-revokes-brewing-license-kirk-bangstad

    Something about not paying taxes

    Bangstad provided a chart explaining what violations were allegedly in the document from the DOR. Those include unauthorized running of a retail outlet, violation of shipping laws and untaxed beer possession in an unpermitted warehouse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I've actually visited the Minoqua location multiple times. The staff seemed happy, and the food and drinks were great.

    Kirk has been very vocally far left in a deeply red area for a long time. He's also done amazing work in bringing together the downtown small business community. It would surprise me if it turned out he was a slimy shit bag.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    That doesn't really have any relevance to the case here though. He's not being accused of serving bad food. And the worst companies for legal compliance and worker treatment often treat their customers great. It's generally not profitable for non-monopolies to anger their customers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    That's fair, I agree that the level of service is not always an indication of how the restaurant is run.

    I do feel it's relevant, however, and I should have elaborated. I lived in the area and worked as a bartender at a resort nearby at the time. We always sat at the bar and talked shop with the employees whenever we went out. Not only that, but it's a tourist area with a very small local, year round population. Everyone knew everyone, and gossip was rampant.

    MBC had a good reputation as a workplace with not a lot of turnover. Their employees seemed like they were genuinely having fun, which isn't common if your work environment sucks in my experience.

    It's generally not profitable for non-monopolies to anger their customers.

    Haha, then I highly encourage you to learn more about this company. Kirk has done plenty to alienate a lot of potential customers and his community. I left that area because the racism was batshit insane. If you're not white, straight, and cis, it's not a comfortable place to live. I respect him for staying and actively fighting against it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Oh there will be yellow liquid on that thing once people move on to some other asshole. You'll know when you're too close 😜.

  • source
  • 34 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 50 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Just to be clear, the promise of free beer and the license revocation are separate. The brewery broke the law on multiple fronts, that's why they lost the license. They also just happened to say the thing about free beer, which maybe brought attention to themselves, but the statements aren't the reason for the punishment.

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    CLOSING businesses who make you FEEL Bad are what MANLY FREEDOM ALPHAS do!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    The manly freedom alphas are going to be so very butthurt, because even if they manage to close every business that makes them feel bad, they will be crying what I'm sure are very manly tears when they get to witness all the dancing, the singing, the fireworks, the free flow of alcohol (and probably weed), and maybe even fucking, in the streets when Donvict kicks the bucket.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 90 points 3 months ago (16 children)

    Seems like a first amendment violation.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 77 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

    Did you read this article or any other article?

    He was shut down by the Wisconsin Department of Revenue for tax violations.

    Bangstad provided a chart explaining what violations were allegedly in the document from the DOR. Those include unauthorized running of a retail outlet, violation of shipping laws and untaxed beer possession in an unpermitted warehouse.

    And he admits to owing taxes. This is an entitled small business owner(TM) trying to claim political persecution as a scapegoat because he's appalled small businesses like his aren't above the law.

    He's also been accused of fraud by former employees in relation to the expenditures of his super PAC, e.g. writing checks for "organizing" that never happened.

    The former employee provided documentation showing he received checks from the Minocqua Brewing Super PAC with "organizing" written in the memo line, despite saying he never performed organizing work or any duties for the Super PAC. Two other former employees confirmed the employee's account.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I'm curious why the employees were receiving checks from the Super PAC. What work did they do? Or are they saying he paid their normal wages like this with "organizing" in the memo for a regular paycheck?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Sorry, I could've stood to include the prior paragraph:

    "I was hired as a manager to basically take care of the bar, take care of his tap room in Madison," said [the same] former employee who requested anonymity. "At first, I was paid by a regular direct deposit, and then he said he's going to pay me from the Super PAC and from the business. And I started to do some research. I spoke with a couple attorneys and an accountant, and they said, that's kind of shady, not a good idea."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    I haven't done a ton of research on the guy, but he definitely seems like a grifter. I started getting emails from him out of the blue a while back. It was a brewery but also a PAC and the surface level messaging seemed like stuff I was aligned with until it started getting a little unhinged.

    He tried to get on the ballot for governor recently but failed. It all kind of seems like political theater.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 0 points 3 months ago* (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Except the owner himself said that he owes taxes. He just also thinks that it's unfair because he's a small business, and that it's a brewery specifically in Wisconsin.

    I love his comments I'm free beer, but he's reaping what he's sowed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    It is, and they’re probably going to win big.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    There is way, way more "stating as fact, but based 100% on feels" on Lemmy than there should be.

    Like this comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (4 children)

    It's not legal to refuse business licenses on the basis of expression, I watched a town near where I grew up lose BIG over something similarly contentious lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    Did you read anything about this other than the headline?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Do you think the town near where I lived didn't also have justifications for what they did? Do you think they're going to put in writing "you can't have a liquor license because we don't like your anti-Trump social media posts"? If they moved on these violations faster than other businesses with similar violations, that can be used as evidence of prejudice and targeting on the basis of political speech.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Yeah man, I psychically divined those details about violations that are in the article but not the headline. You got me.

    ‘Business broke a code so the state government must be completely innocent’ is a ridiculous way to be acting in this day and age in a state that went to Trump both times he won the presidency.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago

    The party of free market capitalism strikes again.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Why were they stripped of their alcohol permit?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Did I miss the part of the article where the DOR explained what regulation was allegedly broken?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    I'd drive from the coast to support these people

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    Sounds like the right wing are some of the biggest snowflakes on the planet.

    And oh yeah, in case anyone forgets:

    It's always projection with the conservatives. Always.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    Democracy 🫡

    And the freedom to do Business however you please 🤌

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Hail Trump. Hail the Fourth Reich. /big s

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    They've outfront about their progressive views and have been ragging on Trump forever. I look forward to seeing them win in court.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Pretty sure giving away alcohol for free is illegal everywhere in the US. I know for sure it is in Illinois. Thats why you need to buy tickets to beer festivals and "use" the tickets to sample beers. Brewers just ignore the tickets and give away their beer because its about getting people to try something new and maybe visit their taproom or buy their beer at the store later.

    What he could do is promote penny beers after Trump's inevitable death.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    No amount of unconstitutional bullshit can stop that particular party, freedom hating fuckers.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Cancel culture, huh. Too woke?

  • source