Obviously we have good 3rd party options for GoG on Linux/SteamOS, but it's still really good to see official Linux support is coming.

all 18 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 25 points 3 months ago

Surprised it’s taken them this long. If they care about game preservation then they need their shit working on Linux.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago
    [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Thank you GoG.

    I use them on windows but recently I've been on Linux 95-5 percent of the time.

    Windows just kinda feels like shit and I hate the idea of GDID.

    The only remaining thing I do on my windows install is play Battlefield and Marathon. That's it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I installed Cachy OS on my personal machine in February and haven't looked back. I only booted into Windows once about a week after I made the switch, and that was just to get some passwords from my password manager. There are a few games I can't play anymore, but I haven't missed them. One of these days I'm going to back up any important files and wipe the Windows drive completely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    I never used GOG galaxy, wonder what would be better than Heroic.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Official support & blessing is always better and involves less toil for maintainers in reverse engineering APIs and keeping them uptodate. For example it is much better if game developers take Linux support seriously than Valve running around fixing all the dumpster fires.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    What I'm hoping is that they start supporting cloud saves for Linux native games, e.g. Silksong. This is something GOG needs to support server-side, and they'd only bother to do that if they have an official Linux client to do the syncing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago

    Official support is good for a couple reasons, it both gives an official method to play the game on linux that's expected to work, and means that if a game doesn't work you have a valid basis to reach out to support or get a refund.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    I am new to Linux, why is Heroic better than Lutris?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Both Lutris and Heroic are front ends that manage the compatibility tools and runtime environments of Windows applications.

    • Lutris provides deeper, more advanced configuration options. It's better if you want to tinker. Lately it's been having some difficulties with zombie processes and failing to shut down games.

    • Heroic is a more streamlined experience with most of the advanced options tucked away in sub-menus, and it has storefront integrations for GOG, Epic, and I think Amazon. For downloading and installing games, it's comparable to Steam. I use it exclusively for games I bought on GOG.

    • Faugus Launcher is similar to Lutris, but lightweight, reliable, and without the zombie process issues. I use it for most non-Steam games.

    • Bottles is a Flatpak app that runs apps in a sandboxed environment, i.e. it doesn't expose your filesystem to the apps. It also tends to have fewer compatibility issues than other runners.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago

    I'm not sure if this has changed, but Lutris for a long time was largely a collection of community install scripts. It used to be one of the better ways to install games on linux, but it was never super reliable, with the install scripts frequently breaking from updates or other changes. This was less of an issue when it was a more popular install platform, but now that a lot of the userbase has moved on to other launchers, the number of broken install scripts are increasing. It also typically installs the windows version of launchers (like epic/etc), which is an extra level of complexity and potential issues compared to stuff like heroic that communicates with storefront APIs directly.

    Heroic is generally a more reliable option for people who want to play specifically Epic/GOG/Amazon games, while other launchers like Bottles and Fargus have become more popular for stuff not installed directly from a game store. I'm not sure exactly why, but it also seems like most of the time when people ask for help with installing a game through lutris, it's usually a pirated copy of the game, and it's difficult to tell if the problems with the game are due to lutris or an issue with the bootleg nature of the game.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Havent they been saying this for a couple of years now? Anyway. I'm very glad they are. Its the one official app I still have to run though Herioc. Id love a native app.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 3 points 3 months ago

    Their stance for a long time was basically "it's something we would like to do eventually", I think it was only the past year or so that they actually committed to trying to make it happen, and this is a confirmation that it's still on the way and hasn't been quietly scrapped.

  • source
  • parent
  • 92 comments in c/linux_gaming@lemmy.ml view that post
    32 comments in c/gaming@lemmy.zip view that post
    31 comments in c/linux_gaming@lemmy.world view that post
    25 comments in c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca view that post
    15 comments in c/linux@programming.dev view that post
    10 comments in c/gog@lemmy.world view that post
    7 comments in c/linux@sh.itjust.works view that post