what’s the source for the $25/kWh claim? that’s about 100x more than I was expecting.
post
discharged via heat exchangers to warm water for the local district heating network.
It needs certain infrastructure to work.
You could also use it to generate electricity. That's 20-40% efficient. With negative prices in summer these days that would still be interesting.
Sounds like interesting tech. But as another poster noted, to be useful it needs to be able to deliver the heat to homes, which requires a steam pipe system. Not necessarily a dealbreaker, but definitely a big up front cost that communities would need to consider.
Also, it makes sense that the battery basically just consumes electricity that would otherwise go to waste. But I think it could be an even better system if the sand were heated more directly by the sun for additional heat storage during winter.
It's interesting piece of technology, but it's not 'radical'. The company behind the storage has done their homework and they seem to be well engineered, but the "technology" itself is pretty much as old as bonfires, people have used hot rocks to heat up tents for 'a while'.
But sand has pretty good thermal properties and size of these new iterations of old tech makes them pretty decent solution for energy storage with renewables. I've been following various 'sand battery' products for our own house, but the main problem with all of them tends to be the size required. In practise for our own house we'd need a sand battery roughly the size of 6m storage container (with heat pumps and all the other hardware) and that'd be so expensive that the investment wouldn't pay itself back in my lifetime.
The main material could be smashed/pulverized glass. The stoage of direct renewable electricity to heat makes the cost (Overall, including climate responsibilities) more appealing when considered along the same lines as Solar panels, or concentrated solar - using a FPS converter that can utilized that direct heat to generate heat back into electricity makes the project a bit of a challenge, but overall a pragmatic solution for long term use cases. Build up in tight spaces and consider alternate uses like wind sheilds and parking spaces when it comes to space conformance. 🤔 I hear aircrete is an insulation thats already prevalent in europe is this true?
The main material could be smashed/pulverized glass.
As in sand. Glass is recyclable material, it makes no sense to use that for this kind of application since sand is already everywhere. Also at least some flavours of glass can melt on temperatures used on these which I'd imagine could cause problems.
I hear aircrete is an insulation thats already prevalent in europe is this true?
At least here in Finland it is not. It could be, but it's not really widely available right now. Maybe in the future, but that would need at least some changes on how things are built.
My parents were planning to build a cabin around a Russian stove (massive stone chimney with beds and a ton of thermal mass) for overnight heat, but ended up in an RV instead when their retirement coincided with the housing collapse.
You need district heating for this to work. Not every place has that, so it's costly to install in places. You could use it to generate electricity, but then there are losses in the conversion.
I'd wager most places in Finland have district heating. Certainly true of Estonia and Finland is even further north.
Now individual homes here in Estonia usually aren't connected to district heating, and not all apartment buildings are, but most are and more are joining because it turns out maintaining your own heating system is a burden most buildings don't want to deal with (nobody usually even wants to head the association)
For Finland, 46% of heating is done with district heating, with it being as high as 90% in the bigger cities.
Germany: ~15%
France: ~6–8%
Netherlands: ~5–7%
USA: <1%
yeah, well usually district heating is a thing in places where heating is major energy consumer. Russia, Nordic countries, Canada and so on.
More temperate places don't have district heating, since the heating need isn't intense enough to warrant it.
The network is expensive to build, but the vast economies of scale make the actual on going heating more efficient and cheaper. Whatever the heating source might be. Be it fuel burning boiler or industrial scale heat pumps.
That's a really great application. I wonder if a thermal battery could be used for both heating and cooling.
I bet it could, same principal and application. Take heat from homes during the day and apply at night. Problem only swaps from "do we have enough to make it through the night" to "do we have enough capacity to make it through the day"
Take heat from homes
That's the tricky part.
This sand battery works by offsetting the production of heat to be used in an already existing district heating system.
That system does not easily change into a district cooling system. It is simply not built to run in reverse. Every part of it from production through distribution, exchanging and in-house distribution are made with one purpose: To transfer heat in one direction.
It makes sense to use renewable energy to charge this battery, so they don't need as much fossil fuel or whatever they use normally.
But, if we were to make a district wide hvac-system the same way, it would probably be better and more efficient to simply use individual airconditioners using the renewable energy directly.
I personally think these types of non-conventional batteries are going to be the future of storing energy for use at offset peak usage times.
It would be great if every city could construct multi thousand megawatts of grid scale battery capacity but that probably isn't feasible with traditional chemistry batteries. But, in some areas the same effect could be accomplished with something like "potential energy batteries", for example, using massive solar arrays to pump water into an elevated reservoir during the day at peak solar generation, then releasing that water to drive turbines and generate on-demand electricity at other times.
It's feasible with the newer sodium ion batteries. They're already being installed for grid use. Similar to lithium batteries, but they're less volatile and can be charged much faster.
They're better suited for grid use than consumer use due to having less energy density than lithium.
we don't even have to build anything new, aside from installing heat pumps which we should be doing anyways for a multitude of reasons such as "i like not dying of heatstroke".
I thought it was like pumped hydro but using sand! Now I'm disappointed. Still cool though, but storing heat is not a long-term solution, is it?
I think of it as a simpler alternative to pumped hydro when all you need is heat. It kind of dumb to waste the great pumped hydro resources that can store electricity on heating stuff. So, this can cover their heating needs during bad weather, and they can used pumped hydro for the rest.
Yes it is. The heat from the sand battery can be used throughout the winter. All you need is good insulation.
Removing industrial and transportation, heating represents is more than half of the energy use in Finland. Being able to store it and use later - particularly in district heating applications - is definitely a long-term solution
For more on strange batteries, Half As Interesting did a really cool video on different ways we do long-term energy storage.
As long as you can expect some periods of very cheap energy before its cold so you can warm it up again, seems like a decent idea actually.
How do they heat it, ideally would be using heat pumps.
I honestly thought it would be bigger. Having said that, we (as in the municipality i work for) currently have 40-60 MWh sand batteries in production. The first, small and hot, one is currently charging to go into production when it gets colder. The bigger and colder battery is slated to start charging the next season.
“And you can store it for long periods, not just two hours or four hours like lithium-ion batteries, but potentially for days and maybe even weeks.”
I'm guessing here, but "for days and maybe even weeks" must be because the battery is above ground? With good insulation seasonal storage is very much in the cards.
A day care in another Swedish municipality use about 1/5 of the "normal" energy for heating thanks to a sand battery. As in 15-18 kwh/m2/year as opposed to 70 kwh/m2/year as is the current upper limit for new buildings in Sweden.
Whoever has been paying attention to renewables knows that much better energy storage would help to solve intermittency. Personally, I've been fascinated with all the R&D being done in this field.
Why not sodium?
I've heard about so many grid storage solutions, from iron to sand apparently, but why not sodium?
all 9 comments