Hey folks, being the family IT man I've held onto all of my families photos/videos over the last 20 years

I've been pretty careless with the backups and I know if I don't do anything it's only a matter of time before I lose them

Although I've never used them, tape drives seem to be the best so I thought I'd ask here if anyone uses them for their homelab?

It might be overkill for a few GB of photos but I'd also use the tape drives for data hoarding purposes so it's a win win in my book

all 45 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 42 points 1 year ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Tape drives are the keytars of the tech world. They seem cool and a pro can really jam with them… but they’re not the most practical and you should really get a guitar or a keyboard until you know what you’re doing.

    That made me snort. But you speak the truth. I have a Roland AX-Edge that I bought off a guy who thought it would be a good idea to play. I think he paid like $1200 for it and after the new wore off, he sold it to me for $400, basically brand new.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I am a mediocre musician on my best day who has been playing stringed instruments for about 65 years now. I also play keyboards, tho not the piano which, imho, is a different instrument entirely. The AX-Edge is not one of my favorite instruments tho. I bought it on a whim thinking I'd give it a go and see what all the buzz was about. Back in the 80s and early part of the 90s, it seemed like everybody had one. After the initial excitement of discovering a new instrument wore off, it kind of goes south from there. The angle at which you have to strike the keys is very different than the angle of my normal keyboards/controllers which doesn't seem like much but it gives me fits. Overall, it wasn't worth the $400 I paid for it, tho I could probably turn it on CL for closer to the original price. The equipment itself is quite capable, it's just one of those oddities I thought would be cool to learn, but in retrospect, $400 could have been better spent elsewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    I have around 65TB backed up on LTO5 tapes. Found them very reliable when needed for a restore and great for an off-site backup.

    However I would say it is overkill for anything under 20TB.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    How much did this system cost? I have an idea for a product and one of the key parts of it is having a huge amount of local storage. I would need like 10x what you have though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The lto 5 drives are around $400 on ebay and the tapes can be had for around $20 each - less if bought in bulk and each tape hold 1.5TB.

    I don't find it that slow as in the event of a restore like i am doing at the moment, I can get through around 3 tapes per 24 hours.

    One thing I will say is although newer LTO standards allow you to treat it like a normal drive it works better using proper software designed for the task like Iperius Backup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    If you have a bigger budget around $2k something like LTO7 with 6TB tapes would be fantastic for larger data sets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    How much do those tapes cost if purchased in bulk? I am trying to figure out how much a petabyte storage system costs, and how much physical space this would take up, and how much electricity it would require to run. I had a lot of trouble finding this information on Google because I know so little about tape storage and don't know what all I would need. I am probably not going to actually do anything with this but I am curious because I had this idea for a product and can't get it out of my mind. The most important part (for the hardware portion) is having nearly a petabyte of physical, local storage. I am aware this would be quite expensive and relatively large, but the product would be intended for governments and companies not individuals.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    How have I never heard of tape drives for backup before? They seam like the ultimate medium for archival storage. Super cheap although very slow, sounds like a good compromise to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Backblaze r2 is $6/tb/mo first 10gb are free

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Looks at my 60tb media archive

    There's got to be a cheaper way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    OP mentioned GBs not TBs. But also, I only backup stuff that I can't redownload, which doesn't include my linux isos. I def wouldn't backup 60tb of media unless its family stuff, but that's me. You do you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Eh it's a lot of hq BluRay rips of disks I don't have anymore. I could reacquire and rerip, but it'd be a total pita. The rest is personal docs/photos/etc. I've been spitballing sticking a NAS at my mom's, but money's tight right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Definitely do not do tapes.

    I'd also recommend Backblaze. Their S3 compatible storage is pretty affordable. I backup to a Kopia repo and then replicate to Backblaze nightly.

    Tapes require so much more work to keep up to date and mght not even be cheaper over time.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    The good ones... Are not cheap (if someone knows a cheap option though, I'd be happy to add it to my own repertoire!)

    For me, I backup with:

    • A second NAS
    • a clone to a NAS at two other homes (family), which also sync to mine
    • Encrypted backups to generic cloud storage

    Edited to add:

    You dont need to backup everything.

    What is being backed up by me at all the locations above:

    • Content I can't replace (home photos, movies, etc)
    • Configs for services
    • Personal documents and other such data.
    • etc

    Aside from the home movies, its not a huge amount of data. Lots of VHS conversions of graduations, Christmases, etc of long past.

    Locally I back up more to the second NAS including:

    • Content I can replace but this is faster
    • Full backups of VMs
    • LXC snapshots
    • etc

    So while I have a huge amount of storage at home, what's needed elsewhere is not anywhere near as much.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The offsite NAS at the family’s house - how did you configure offsite access? Did you have to upgrade their router?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    Great question! If it's only a few GB I wouldn't bother with tape. There are other options like

    • Google Photos - I've been using it for 10+ years without filling up the free 10 or 15 GB, whatever it is.
    • Burning a bunch of DVDs, repeat every 5 years.
    • Get a couple cheap hard drives then replace 1 of them every 3-5 years so one is always fairly new.
  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    a few GB of photos

    get an m-disc burner and make multiple full backups to distribute around your family

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Hetzner Storage box is $20/month for 10tb.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Forget the tapes. This is hard to say but just pay for online storage. It's $9.99 a month for 2TB from Google and Apple. Your data will be safe and accessable by family if something happens to you. You could also get a cheap NAS like device like this https://a.co/d/dgsnQbr and maybe every couple of months you create a offline backup onto another device.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    @BigTrout75 @Squiddork and ffs print out some instructions on how to access it all. And tell someone where you've put that.Consider using a decent password manager and you'll only need to let your loved ones know how to get into that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    In this vein, Backblaze Personal unlimited account would be well worth it to me. $8.25 USD ($99/year contract) for unlimited backups. The downside to Backblaze is if you're pushing large volumes of data, like above 5 TB, it is excruciatingly slow doing a restore online. Luckily, they will sell/rent you a 10 TB drive with your data, shipped to you. After you make the restore/transfer, you can decide to send the drive back for a full refund, or keep it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    Why do tape drives seen to be best? What's your use case? They're still used in enterprise environments because they're insanely dense compared to hard disks, and it's real easy to load a truck with a few petabytes to ship elsewhere. Is that what you need? Density? Seems like not for just a few gigs.

    If you want backups you need to ship your media, tapes or otherwise, off-site.

    Pop your files into a cloud service and call it done. If you're looking for long term archives and don't want to use other people's computers, burn some DVDs and store them at someone else's house.

  • source
  • My advice is avoid tape backups. The cost, risk of media degredation, and management overhead make them not worth it, especially for a homelab.

    Also, restoring an entire VM is almost easier than recovering a single file, just because of the sequential nature of reading data from a tape. Data recoveries are pretty slow in general.

    I backup to an external hard drive with regular copies to iDrive S3. Been doing it that way for a number of years with no problems.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Tape is unfortunately uneconomical for regular people due to the drives costing so much, unless you get a used, older generation one.

    How many GB's do you mean? Maybe try some optical discs, BD-R at 25GB maybe.

    Otherwise just rent some online storage. Hetzner Storage Box is cheap and Storage Share is only slightly less cheap, and has lots of sharing features (it's really NextCloud).

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    If they're considering optical media, typical BD-R, while viable, may not be be the best choice. BD-R M-Discs would probably be a better choice for backups. Especially if they're planning on needing access to the data over a period of decades, which would be potentially useful for familiy photos/videos and critical documents.

    They are more expensive, as is the drive needed for them, but not by enough to be out of reach or even unreasonable given the additional durability of the discs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    DVDs are the same idea but easier

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I wouldn’t do tape. If you don’t want a cloud option, why not use use a thumb drive?

    If you are willing to do tape, you can store a thumb drive into same way.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Tapes can have long term issues in storage, as the tape reel winds will eventually start to bleed over magnetic signals from one wind to the next.

    In analog world, they call it tape hiss. In digital world, with good error correction, it can last a long time, but is still ultimately prone to data corruption, eventually..

    I recommend a video surveillance rated multi terabyte hard drive, they're designed to run 24/7. I have two 4TB Seagate Skyhawks.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    LTO tape is good for 30 years when properly stored. You should be transferring the data to a newer format much sooner than that anyways. LTO drives are only backwards compatible for 1 or 2 versions, so you probably won't be able to find a working drive that can read your tape 30 years later.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Tape drives will be expensive and likely beyond overkill for this. I'd recommend you grab a blue ray DVD writer and use that instead. The discs are generally shelf stable for 25 years and hold about 50-128GB depending on the disc. Duplicates are cheap, storage is relatively easy, and it doesn't require constant upkeep/power like a hard drive would. Downsides? They just stopped making the discs, so they'll grow in cost over time. That's about it that I can think of.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments