From the GOG newsletter: "A note about your GOG Patrons subscription"

Transcription as alt text for the image.

#GOG

**Dear Patron,**

We want to let you know that due to a technical issue on our end, at least one of your GOG Patrons monthly subscription was not charged. We've since identified and resolved the problem.

**Here's what this means for you:**  
• Your next subscription charge will go through as normal.  
• We will **NOT** retroactively bill you for the missed​period — consider it on us.  
• You don't need to take any action.

​We appreciate your continued support of GOG Patrons, and we're sorry for any confusion this may have caused.

Warm regards,  
**The GOG Team**

all 45 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 69 points 3 months ago (22 children)
  • [+] -50 points 3 months ago (21 children)

    Yeah, they're so great for... not charging their monthly donation subscription twice?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    ... For giving everyone of them the month for free because they messed up their billing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 3 months ago

    Also if I may add, having followed GOG for some 9 years now, it always seemed to me like their worst side is transparency/communications, only starting to change in recent years but weakly so. Having them share the information openly, even if by newsletter, is to me quite the improvement already.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -8 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    A free month of... access to a discord server?

    What exactly does GOG Patrons give me?

    As a Patron, you'll get access to our dedicated community Discord server, featuring fun gaming-related activities and exclusive video content, plus special recognition across GOG in the form of unique badges and mentions on GOG Preservation Program game pages. Perks may grow or change over time, but we'll always communicate them clearly before you sign up.

    I can't imagine GOG is losing much

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    You had to scroll through a lot on your linked site to get to the part that you copied... It is not a service, it is more of a donation. Hence the name "Patron" I assume.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -11 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    It is not a service, it is more of a donation.

    Yeah, they’re so great for… not charging their monthly donation subscription twice?

    I'm pretty sure I knew that already. The other guy said they got a month "for free," which begs the question "what are you getting?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Nothing material in the sense that you imply. Access to the community, that's it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    A free month of… access to a discord server?

    Thanks, but I'm pretty sure I already knew that too

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Great! Now put all the pieces together :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You were wrong and now you're barking at some other thing, a bit pathetic isn't it? It's not life threatening to say you misunderstood. It happens to all of us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Have i misunderstood. They wouldn't have been charging it twice. They messed up the billing so their options were charge for the missed one or don't charge. Not charge twice....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Presumably, if they didn't give everyone affected a "free month" of access to a discord server, they would charge them for the month where there was a mistake and then again for the current month. They'd be charging twice now to make up for the fact that some people weren't charged earlier.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    What? The message literally says they will not be charging for the missed month

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

    if they didn’t give everyone affected a “free month” of access to a discord server, they would charge them

    Why is everyone in this thread telling me what I already said?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You ever stop to consider that perhaps you're the one having issues communicating with everybody else?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago

    I see this like people making comments without reading a linked article in a post: you already think you know what it says so you don't bother actually reading anything to make sure you're right. I don't think it really matters what I say if people aren't even going to bother reading it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    So rather than admit you might have been wrong, you invented a situation where you were right

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    It was me explaining how GOG are the good guys, for not charging twice, for their monthly donation subscription.

    It's objectively the right thing to do, but it shouldn't even matter because anyone donating to a for-profit company should be financially secure enough to handle a late withdrawal from their account.

    So again, while GOG not charging people on the donation subscription plan is the right thing to do, GOG doesn't provide much (if anything) of value for that subscription in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 3 months ago
    [–] 10 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Why would anyone donate to a for profit company?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (17 children)

    Dear patron,
    in light of the recent bad publicity for shining a light on our Nazi leanings, we've decided that we can't afford any more bad publicity at the moment, and are highlighting how cool and good we are by eating a small financial mistake we made.
    Rest assured that if we couldn't financially afford to do this we wouldn't be allowing you to keep your free month.

    Best,

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (16 children)

    Do you have a source for that claim?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (14 children)

    Of their knowing sharing of Nazi imagery? Yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (7 children)
  • [+] -13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

    Go fuck yourself, trash. Learn to read.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    So no source then. Go spread your lies elsewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    There is quite literally a source posted directly above you. Stop flaming, calm down and take in new information. This was a very well publicized story.

    The apology doesn't substantially address how the symbols wound up in the email in the first place. The problem with the runes isn't their placement, it's that they are explicitly and indelibly associated with Nazis and white supremacists. Just as with the swastika, their meaning prior to the Third Reich is irrelevant: The Nazi links are too clear and prevalent to pretend that any other connection is equally meaningful.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (3 children)

    A source was already shared hours before you decided to be a dick. Fuck off and read it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    A relevant source, I do not see one where GOG is ran by nazis mr tourette.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Disabilities as insults? That makes sense for you, tbh. My instinct was right: you're genuinely a bad person.

    Get blocked, loser.

     

    SOURCE

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago

    Lol you're the one spewing insults as a maniac (in maniac good enough for you?) because you don't have the mental capacity to respond in a normal way. Moron is maybe better, or is that too bad too for mr sensitive snowflake?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Oh you do have a source? Please share then, I'd like to learn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    A source has already been shared, hours ago. You're clearly just trying to be antagonizing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Not at all, you were the one who said you had a source. So I wanted your source. I've read the ones other people posted. But you are the one antagonizing, because you started this whole source discussion, yet you seem to be the only one who isn't providing one. You're just talking shit and letting everyone else try to back you up.

    You wanna parrot what you "heard" and expect others to back you up, but when I ask you for a source, I want yours. But sure, sit on that high horse if you want, but everyone else can see it's not a horse, it's an ass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Good Old Guys

  • source