all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I thought it was just me. Glad to know I'm not alone.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago
    [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    Same. Eating is just a chore

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    This is just like my wife!

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    even though food is good, it would be really nice to never eat again if I never had to experience the nausea

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    inb4 “ackshually it’s ’nauseated’“

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    I think your problem might not be your hunger or eating unless you're eating spoiled food.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (6 children)

    What do you mean? If you're saying the problem is neither then what is it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (5 children)

    If you feel nauseated regardless of whether or not you have eaten, then there is no correlation to your state of having eaten with your nausea. Something else must be causing your nausea. If it is temporary, maybe a stomach bug or some medication. If it is chronic, maybe GERD/acid reflux or gastritis.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (4 children)

    Huh???

    That's not what the OP is saying.

    Sometimes when I am nauseated, it's because I haven't eaten in too long. Other times when I am nauseated, it's because I ate something that didn't agree with me or I'm sick. It becomes difficult to tell which it is until you try eating something.

    If eating something ends up improving the nausea, then it was because you needed to eat. If eating ends up making the nausea worse, it's because you're sick or ate something that didn't agree with you. You can see how this then becomes a dangerous game to play.

    This is not "nausea regardless of state". This is nausea where you can't tell the cause without potentially making it worse.

    Have you really never been in that scenario before?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    There are 3 steps in the meme. "Nauseated and having not eaten." "Eating." "And nauseated after having eaten." So this person is clearly nauseated for reason beyond hunger or having eaten, unless their nausea before was cause from hunger and the nausea after was caused by eating spoiled food.

    Also hunger does not cause me nausea, so... no can't say I relate directly. It can for my wife though, so I have dealt with that situation. But if she was nauseated, ate something, and then was still nauseated, then clearly it wasnt the hunger causing her nausea. It was something else, like a flu, meds, or digestive issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    You're not getting it because your body doesn't do this. That's ok. Your wife probably does then.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    I don't see what there is to "get". I understand what you are saying. I'm saying that you are projecting meaning onto the meme that isn't there, or are trying to conflate it with some other meaning. The point still stands, regardless of how your body reacts to hunger, that if your nausea is persistent regardless of whether or not you have eaten recently, then your issue isnt simply related to whether you have eaten, is it? There is nothing to get beyond that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    I was always like this until I started taking stimulants

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Ah yes, the agonies of refeeding syndrome

    And/or

    Just a normal day with semaglutide! 😄

  • source