Fifield, 41, is the second woman to allege this week that Platner engaged in nonconsensual sexual conduct. Jenny Racicot, 41, who said she previously dated Platner, told The Post and other outlets on Monday that he sexually assaulted her in late 2021, leading a growing number of allies to drop their endorsements and call on him to withdraw from the race for a Maine seat in the U.S. Senate. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), his most influential and prominent supporter, said he spoke with Platner on Tuesday and urged him to withdraw from his campaign to unseat Susan Collins, the incumbent Republican.

Platner, 41, a Marine Corps veteran and oyster farmer, also denied Racicot’s allegation but said on Monday that he was “mindful of the political reality” that the reporting will “inflict” on his campaign and was “taking the time to reflect on the best path forward.”

Fifield initially told The Post about the alleged condom removal during a June 20 interview that was off the record. She said she decided to speak publicly about it Tuesday in part because, she said, she wanted to show that Racicot was not alone in experiencing issues with Platner involving sexual consent.

top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 46 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I hate politics. And this is precisely why.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Yes politics sucks. The sad part is it only gets worse the less you pay attention, but because you're not paying attention, all is good.

    This whole thread though feels like two bots arguing about which one is more right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    It gets worse the more I pay attention. It gets worse no matter what. It destroys my faith in humanity and makes me hate being part of a social species.

    Fuck everyone and I hope we go extinct because we deserve it.

    And this reaction gets worse with every election cycle. Every election makes me hate people more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 89 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    Fifield, who spent 7 years working for the Heritage Foundation and made all of these accusations a few months ago without any evidence, is the reason why people are so hesitant to take the more recent one seriously.

    If the Heritage Foundation is doing anything to take you down, you're probably doing something right.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Heritage foundation.... Yeah they are pretty much all liars . plus aren't they against contraception?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    It’s a long listen but worth checking out How Conservatism Won by Robert Evans. He lays out in a clear concise way “how a consortium of rich failsons got together to fund a network of right wing think tanks and shift American culture in a fun new direction. (note: it was not actually fun at all).”

    The Heritage Foundation is the at the root of a lot of the issues in the U.S. right now, it really can't be overstated just how malicious they are. They write the policies and vet the candidates, if they're not the actual shadowy cabal they definitely share some membership.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    So Maine's choices are an alleged sexual assualter or a known and confirmed adjudicated rapist and 99.9% likely a pedo protector known as Susan Collins? Two extremely shitty choices, I'll admit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    The Politco story is well sourced with therapist and boyfriend messages from before Platner was ever in politics.

    Sometimes a broken clock is correct, this is one of those times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Did they publish the evidence? Or are we to take the word of complicit media?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    There are images of the texts in the Politico article. The therapist and ex-boyfriend's testimonies as well.

    It's not about taking the word of complicit media - it's about taking this woman's word.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I for one do believe her, however not without skepticism stemming from the massive and well funded effort to get him out of the race and put a friendly (to neo liberals) in position for critical votes. Both parties are making a massive effort here and therefore their actions, and those of media under their control are more suspect. I hadn't seen the publication of evidence yesterday, guess I missed it. Thank you for sharing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    I mean that's the whole asymmetric corner we've painted ourselves into. Every time you give flimsy accusations the benefit of the doubt, you make real accusations less credibile. Every time you doubt real accusations, you enable rape culture. Normally the ethics seem clear - always believe women and rape culture eventually starves. But what if fascists weaponize the issue before that happens?

    Yeah, common sense says a conservative activist doing this during a campaign is probably full of shit. But didn't Brett Kavanaugh's accusers have the same smell? Maybe jumping in front of the spotlight is the only way these women can be taken seriously.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 64 points 4 months ago (43 children)

    I don't wanna be that guy, but purposefully removing a condom during sex without consent is rape.

  • source
  • hideshow 43 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    We’ve got weirdos pretending that this waters down the term rape in this thread, lovely.

    When you are having sex with someone, presumably you are trusting them? You are trusting them to be safe, to not push boundaries, to do only things you consent to do.

    When someone stealths you, they are saying that they don’t give a fuck about you. That trust was misplaced. They are willing to do something to you that you explicitly did not want. Are they going to stop there? (The same type also often pushes for anal/“accidentally” attempts penetration there.)

    It’s terrifying and traumatic. Your head races - are you current on your birth control? How likely do you think it is that this guy has some disease? And you get a physical reminder that your consent didn’t matter, the sensation and needing to clean up after if they finished.

    It’s also so goddamned common. It’s trivialized.

    If you slip the condom off without someone’s consent, you are a rapist. Rape fucks victims up whether it’s a stranger in the bushes or a FWB stealthing you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    What if it slips off because your dick is too small?

    Maybe he’s got a thin penis like the detective in Deuce Bigalo Male Gigalo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -19 points 4 months ago (31 children)

    Then don't be. Rape is too overloaded. Find a more descriptive term.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago (12 children)

    "I consent to protected sex" is not equivalent to "I consent to unprotected sex."

    Rape means here is no valid consent to the sexual act itself (or consent is obtained through force, coercion, incapacity, etc.).

    The sexual act in question is unprotected sex. The man had no valid consent to the sexual act itself. Consent was not obtained. The woman's bodily autonomy was violated.

    He knew this when he tried to take it off. Otherwise he could have consentfully never used it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    Exactly, it's more than just rape. It rape with intent to deceive or something. That's why it needs a more descriptive term.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Rape describes the action which took place. Deceit describes the manner in which it took place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (4 children)

    Just like aggravated rape. It communicates additional crimes, and supports longer sentences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I think I get where you’re coming from, but it’s still rape. You could categorize it, sure, but it should still have rape in the name just like aggravated rape does. Point being that some losers like to call it stealthing. But we already had to word for that stuff, “rape.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Oh sure, rape can certainly still be part of the term. No issue with that. Didn't really think there was any reason it shouldn't be. But "just" calling it rape seems an injustice.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Well, I’d argue that it’s similar to raping someone who is unconscious. Because the act of removing a condom is, in effect, a manner of violating personal autonomy without their knowledge. With aggregated rape, presuming that means forceful, the victim knows what’s happening.

    I’d even stick by this assessment because, should the victim become aware during the act and express discontent — it can then become aggravated rape, as well. Hell, even if the victim doesn’t express anything… because a victim could notice the initial form, then become too scared to directly address the matter. That ought count as both forms still, right?

    I would be in favor of distinguishing between the two forms, legally, if it meant that perpetrators can get hit with both charges at the same time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    I am in favor of it being two charges. I really think there should be a bunch of them really. It's just not one type of crime. It is many. Like raping a prepubescent child is a charge on top of rape, and likely another charge for abuse of trust position based rape as well. The punishment and required treatment are different than for raping a 17 year old who the person held no position of trust or power over (like a 22 year old boyfriend type situation). Currrently they are both just "rape" in some states.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    This is like when a Muslim family is attacked and the comments are all debating if racism is the correct term since Muslim isn't a race.

    It's just muddying the waters, destructing from the crime and the victims, and providing cover for the wrongdoers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Both are arguing over the technical definition instead if the injustice committed. It's exactly like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago* (7 children)

    we're not here to censore violence and minimize what happened to an actual victim of violence because your sensitive ears cant hear it. you and your delicate ears are not the victim here. the rape victim is. stop making their trajedy about your ears.

    be a better person than this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    You loaded a lot of BS into my words that wasn't there just to feel superior. Be a better person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Then don’t be. Rape is too overloaded. Find a more descriptive term.

    We don't need to load any BS into your words, there's plenty on display.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    So, since you only see what you want to, let me spell it out. They already have various categories of rape. Like aggravated rape and such. These are like rape+. I am saying a more descriptive term like that should be used to highlight the heinousness of the crime. But you refuse to see that. You just want to be righteous so bad you will make up something to be righteous about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    You're tone policing now.

    YATA. Meet my block list.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago*

    Perfect, anyone who is incapable of understanding this concept, please do block me. That will save me the trouble of having to explain to people who's minds are made up and don't want to rethink their opinion in light of new information.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    Removing a condom during sex without consent, known as “stealthing,” is classified as a form of sexual assault in several countries, including Britain, Canada and parts of Australia. In the United States, Maine, California and Washington state have laws that address the nonconsensual removal of condoms during sex.

    There is another term for it, however, it still fits the bill as rape.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    I don't wanna be that guy, but it is rape. If you think that it isn't, it's on you to find the descriptive term, not me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    So the guy is also accused of not stopping when she said stop. That is also rape. Do you not see a problem with calling them both rape? Which sounds worse, 2 counts of rape. Or 1 count of rape and one count of . To me the second one conveys that he has a pattern of disregard for women beyond just one situation. I also think the condom thing shows intentional deception, where as he could claim he was too far into it to stop when she told him to. Combined as seperate things, they are more incriminating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    So the guy is also accused of not stopping when she said stop. That is also rape. Do you not see a problem with calling them both rape?

    ...No????

    They ARE both rape.

    Just because one rape is different from another rape doesn't mean they're not both rape, what the actual fuck are you talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    where as he could claim he was too far into it to stop when she told him to.

    This made my skin crawl.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 35 points 4 months ago (15 children)

    She estimated that Platner removed condoms without her consent at least six times when they had sex at both of their residences in D.C. during their two-year, on-and-off relationship. She said she told him that she was upset about it but that he would make light of the situation.

    “I confronted him both during and after [sex] because he knew that I was not on birth control and how dangerous that was,” she told The Post in one interview. In another, she said: “He would act like cute about it, like ‘Oh sneaky me.’”

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    I really don't understand women. What would compel a person to have sex with someone who raped them 5 times already?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    Men get stuck in bad and abusive relationships as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    She said they dated on and off for about a year. Doesn't sound like being "stuck" in a relationship. I get it that people have issues. I guess I'm just lucky I never had to deal with anything like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah relationships can be complicated. It's not only women that get caught up in it though.

    I'm going to take a wild educated guess that this particular woman's conservative background set her up to allow men to take advantage of her in various ways as a pattern, but that is admittedly speculating based on lived experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah relationships can be complicated. It’s not only women that get caught up in it though.

    Yeah, I guess you're right. I still don't get this though. There are bad matches, toxic relationships and then there's being raped and agreeing to more sex. Just fucked up people going through things I guess. The question about Platner is can you really change? Or having issues 10 years ago means you can never be trusted again? And if that's the standard should we trust his ex?

    Anyway, I think the issue was making him the candidate in the first place. It was clear form the beginning he's toxic. People pretended it's fine as long as they could but there's a limit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Or having issues 10 years ago means you can never be trusted again?

    Pretty sure this happened only 5 years ago in 2021. And no, I don't think that's enough time to change enough as a person to be trusted with a seat in the Senate personally.

    Anyway, I think the issue was making him the candidate in the first place. It was clear form the beginning he’s toxic. People pretended it’s fine as long as they could but there’s a limit.

    I absolutely agree. He should have never been chosen to begin with considering his complete history.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    He dated Fifield (the one accusing him of removing condoms) over 13 years ago. I thought the rape allegation are also from decade ago but you're right, it was 5 years ago. So yeah, looks like he didn't change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    FYI, the other allegations are also rape.

    He entered her home without her knowing, then forced himself on her despite her telling him over and over that she didn't want it.

    He also came inside her after she explicitly asked him not to (she wasn't on birth control).

    Dude is a fucking Nazi rapist. We should be relieved that this came out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 5 points 4 months ago

    Ohhhh hahaha our interaction pissed someone off enough to go through my recent post history and downvote every single comment.

    My goodness, the misogynists on this site get so cranky hahaha

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Ya'll pretending like men like this, especially men who seek power, don't commonly sexually assault and rape women.

    You should read up on Occam's razor

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (6 children)

    Bad archive service that edits stored content and uses visitors to DDoS a website.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Actually really good point, I meant to grab the original Washington Post link anyway. It's updated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Yet I use that site often and when I've looked into network traffic, the only high traffic comes from one of my devices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    I use it myself quite often as well, I just really had meant to grab the original link for the post so nbd to update it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    If the guy has any actual desire to do good in the world, the best thing he could do now is drop out. Given his stated politics, I figured the tattoo was from when he was young and stupid, like he said, but this shit... People don't outgrow this shit.

    He needs to go.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 27 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    I dug up his old Reddit comment about rape victims earlier because I was curious and couldn’t quite remember the details:

    “Holy fuck, how about people just take some responsibility for themselves and not get so fucked up they wind up having sex with someone they don’t mean to? Men and women, you make a choice to consume enough of a substance to lose your self control. So if you don’t want to be in a comprising situation, act like an adult for fucks sake.”

    He needs to drop out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -24 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    They can outgrow it, just takes more work than most people are willing to do. I'm with you though, if he were truly reformed he wouldn't say it never happened, he'd own up to it an explain.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Yeah, there's still plausible deniability, I'm not fully convinced he's a rapist, I'm just not particularly convinced he isn't given the accusations. Holding his ground will say he's more invested in his ego than his professed beliefs.

    If he's innocent I hope he drops out and continues the fight to clear his name.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›