you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (25 children)

It's why ranked choice is the only sane voting approach. First past the post heavily favors right wing authoritarians.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago*

    Ranked-choice voting is a decent choice for uninominal elections.

    Proportional elections are a popular alternative, and they are arguably fairer than even RCV because they are not susceptible to gerrymandering or votes otherwise being weighted by geography (i.e. your vote still matters just as much as anyone's if you live in Redneckville, Mississippi). They do have other downsides though.

    Unfortunately here in Belgium we do proportional voting and the Prime Minister is nonetheless a far-right separatist in charge of a right-wing coalition so, uh, maybe FPTP is not the only thing that stands between the citizenry and a communist utopia lol

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (22 children)

    β€œVoting is actually bad” Tankies 🀝 Nazis

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [+] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)
  • [+] -7 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    "I support genocide"

    Anti-tankies 🀝 Nazis

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    " The Holo-incident is not THAT bad" Tankies 🀝 Nazis

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (8 children)

    Comparing a famine caused by poor harvests across eastern europe and exacerbated by poor management to the fucking holocaust is wild.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    "poor management" is one hell of a way to put it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I mean, even the Holocaust could also be said to boil down to poor management if we're just doing shitty arguments.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    The holocaust was the result of pretty effective management, only possible with the latest technology, courtesy of IBM.

    What lesson do libs and anarchists take away from the holodomer anyway? Don't try to redistribute grain or stop hording during a famine?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Literally only tankies are stupid enough to believe old Soviet Propaganda about how Holodomer was not a genocide. when it clearly was.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Well you can either look at the now public soviet archives to see what the government was saying to themselves, you know primary sources, and plenty of historians who cite those or you can accept what anti-communists with no primary sources and a weird tendency to rehabilitate nazi-collaborators say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    This is why far "left" and "right" are itself misguided labels. It's more like far opposite on the other end where they meet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Horsehoe theory is misguided itself, it was pitched purely to distance liberalism from fascism when historically they are linked, and to demonize those who support collectivization over privatization. Read Blackshirts and Reds.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    For almost all of human history, the current center of the the western Overton window would have been considered far, far left. Does that mean that monarchism and feudalism is the true center, and liberalism is actually the same as being to the far right of monarchism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    The modern left-right political spectrum only makes sense in a modern sense. Trying to apply it like it's some sort of universal law is stupid. Monarchism, for example, can't be placed on the spectrum because there are different types of monarchies that are radically different from each other and there are different monarchs within each of those systems that are radically different from each other.

  • source
  • parent