you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 29 points 2 weeks ago (15 children)

Rationalism it was: instead of bothering with heads they proved the number with foreskins. Much lighter and safer to store for longer time.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

    I think the reasoning is that since Jews lacked foreskins but their neighbors the philistines had them, bringing the foreskins showed that it was not Jews you went out to kill. It's like if you wanted someone to kill 100 rattler snakes and as proof you bring 100 rattlers as that's their distinctive body part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    So we actually have found some logic in Bible? Unexpected...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    I mean, the "logic" that led to the Israelites not having foreskin to begin with isn't exactly rock solid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    yeah but how else are you going to give hepatitis to a baby?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Historically, heads weren’t all that common. Usually only for specific bounties where you’d need to show it was the right person.

    For more general things, scalps, ears, and fingers were all far more common.

    I mean think about it. It’s gruesome enough on its own. But, fondling dead guy dick is… especially unpleasant. (And they probably stank.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments