you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 58 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

I think the reasoning is that since Jews lacked foreskins but their neighbors the philistines had them, bringing the foreskins showed that it was not Jews you went out to kill. It's like if you wanted someone to kill 100 rattler snakes and as proof you bring 100 rattlers as that's their distinctive body part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    So we actually have found some logic in Bible? Unexpected...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    I mean, the "logic" that led to the Israelites not having foreskin to begin with isn't exactly rock solid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    yeah but how else are you going to give hepatitis to a baby?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)