This is the future (reddthat.com)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
emoji 1
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 432 points 1 month ago (106 children)

To be fair, nfts and vr were never forced on consumers quite like AI is. VR is incredible for certain types of gaming. NFTs are also incredible too. They allow you to quickly identify morons with disposable income.

  • source
  • hideshow 106 child comments
  • [–] 110 points 1 month ago (21 children)

    Correct, the only idiotic thing about VR is buying your hardware from Mark Zuckerberg. As the folks in the VR community here are already aware, I got my Steam Frame the other day and basically the only reason I've had to take it off my face since then is because the thing has a finite battery life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    It's funny how people were comparing the Frame to Quest, saying it's DOA because of the price, niche device only for a few enthusiasts.

    Meanwhile, the Frame is flying off the shelves and the waitlist seems to be twice as long as the number of the units available. :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I'm on the waitlist and can't wait to get my hands on it. I'm a gamer since the 80s, and it's the first VR device i actually can't wait to get my hands on. The prospect of getting a VR headset that is as well supported as any valve hardware while not spying on me is simply great. If others are like me, it explains a lot why the line is so long.

    Edit: My specific use case is as an replacement for a large TV for playing games on. It takes less space and is less invasive than any Smart-TV nowadays.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    All the joy of Steam, pumped directly into my eyeballs? Yes, please.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    And all the joy of also being a small Linux computer, still with the eyeballs thing. Hit "desktop" in the hotbar on the bottom and you're looking at a KDE environment.

    Most programs can also be opened into a separate full-screen styled floating window you can stick wherever in virtual space, independent of the base desktop.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    You can move the main center window and the dashboard bar by grabbing the long skinny horizontal stripe beneath either them, same as moving any other floating window. Unless you hit "float in world" on the center window the dashboard/taskbar/clock will remain pinned to the bottom of it.

    The inverse L shaped grab handle on the lower right of any window allows you to resize it. When you are holding it, pushing the analog stick forward or back will move it closer to you or farther away.

    Word on the street is that you can use FrameDrop to put .apks (and other executables) into your Frame's library. I haven't had occasion to try it; my main interest in onboard software has been regular productivity-ish apps that run natively in Linux. I stream actual games from my desktop PC, which is approximately three million times more powerful than the Frame itself.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    Think Valve said something about that in the future. Also you can use a power bank while using was also mentioned. If I'll get the money I'm definitely buying steam frame rather than to buy spy hardware.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Jokes aside, they all have something in common: a technology that can be useful in some very specific niches, but is advertised as a solution to all problems in the world and usd in large scale for things they shouldn't be used for, just to grab investors' money

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 month ago (54 children)

    VR and AR both have massive unrealised potential. It just seems the tech isn't quite there to break through just yet, especially for AR.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 54 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    I get nauseated very fast with a vr headset and I don't think it will improve, there have been several generations of improvements where people have told me they are so good now, and every time I feel like crap within a minute or two.

    I think that is another major problem with vr, it's unusable by some percentage of people that I think is significant enough to affect the market (or lack thereof).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    I've found an acid test for susceptibility to VR sickness. Driving in VR.

    Most brains know what it feels like to be in a car, in control or otherwise. Feed in only the visuals of "being in a car" and watch the face turn green in tandem with the brain's ancient "we've eaten poison!" subroutine kicking in.

    In Elite: Dangerous, I can pirouette a Vulture round an asteroid field -permaboosting with flight assist off- shooting other ships all day long. Drop an SRV onto a moon and drive 100 metres, pass me the sick bucket.

    I put this down to having plenty sensory memory of "car" but none of "high velocity space fighter".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    The chatbot is just as likely to tell you it canceled the meeting without cancelling the meeting.

    There was a recent talk by the guy that started Zoom and he was pushing an AI technology that would attend meetings for you. It was so ridiculous because the ultimate dream would be a bunch of AI chatbots attending a meeting on behalf of their operators, and what would the point of that even be?

    I think it was Angela Collier on YouTube if you want to share some rage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    My current employer is pushing AI HARD. Like "throw out old processes, 10x everything, the singularity is here so we can't work the way we always have".

    The thing is, the best use case for AI I have found is replacing middle management. The bots are pretty good at summarizing a bunch of PRs and doc updates into weekly bullet point progress updates (which is 90% of how those managers are judged). I've flirted with the idea of making an AI team manager to replace the helicopter EMs and PMs and let the devs focus on the dev'ing.

    That idea got shut down quite quickly.. wonder why.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Wait, if they get rid of PM's who is going to hop out during a long tense meeting and get donuts and coffee?

    This seems really short sighted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (29 children)

    AR has so many unsolvable privacy issues it's wild ..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Honestly I don't need a camera or anything integrated but I'd love to have an integrated screen for my glasses. Would be nice when putting things together to just sync it with my phone and just have it there, also maps. Look I have to wear glasses all the time might as well add a tiny bit more utility.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    It's solvable if you take surveillance capitalism out of the equation, just as Valve are doing. AR with Meta behind it will never be something that is socially acceptable since their whole business model is selling out the user and everyone around them. With a company like Valve which has a pretty good track record regarding privacy (a.k.a the only things transferred regarding usage are what games you play to make store recommendations fit your taste and bug reports if you approve them) i can see a wider adoption taking place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I don't think that's true, your personal privacy as the owner of the device is one thing, everyone else's right to not be continuously photographed is another. Having Valve operate it over meta doesn't solve that. Also, what happens when Gabe does and the investment bank that buys it decides they want to sell everyone data to maximise profit?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    There's a difference between passively waiting for a voice command by a person identified in RAM and storing these things. And sure, there will always be people breaking the rules, but if you actually try to make the product secure, the vast amount of people will NOT be fucking around with that.

    Take Metas PervGlasses for example: There's a LED that shows it is recording. You can remove that light with a simple dremel, and no one at Meta even thought about implementing a simple check like making the LED flash a OTP code to be recognized by the camera at the start of recording. It makes a whole lot of difference who is developing these things, trust me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I always thought it could be useful to use NFT as a proof of ownership in a software, for example you buy a game you get an NFT that proves your ownership, down the line you sell the game to someone else, you handover the NFT and bam you are no longer the owner. But software companies won't use that as it would create a resale value and THEY want to sell new games not le YOU sell your games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Yeah, I honestly don't know of any tech that has been pushed so hard. NFTs were never something large companies were interested or invested in, and VR was always a niche product. I find AI useful for certain things, but I hope this bubble bursts as soon as possible...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    I played an MMO in 2002. People made financial transactions for things in a digital universe. That MMO shut down and the servers wiped around the time Bored Ape shit started. Made me laugh.

    But then again, Steve Bannon once made a living selling WoW gold. Shit is wild.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (6 replies)