you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 155 points 3 months ago (77 children)
  • [–] 81 points 3 months ago (73 children)

    I understand it’s a joke but I wanted to throw some other numbers out there for people to consider, since resistance training can massively improve your quality of life and it’s very common for people to believe it needs to be a full time job to see results. For disclosure, I am a trainer but don’t offer services via lemmy

    But you can get head-turning, people-ask-you-questions-unprompted levels of muscular with <5 hours a week in the gym. And that’s the full time commitment for what I’d called a “serious trainee”, any more than that is mainly for people who simply love training as a form of recreation and actively want to spend more time lifting.

    Most of my clients do 2.5 hours a week and still get great visual results, albeit more slowly. More importantly, you cash in on quality of life benefits with shockingly little weekly commitment. Even one session per week is enough to feel huge improvements in energy and endurance during day to day tasks, improve your metabolic health, improve your bone health, improve your mental health, as well as experience the whole cascade of improved injury outcomes (for example resistance trained individuals are less likely to fall, less likely to be injured if they do fall, and are more likely to make a full recovery if they do get injured).

    It’s extremely worth starting, for all ages and genders. Again, apologies for being overly serious under a joke. I like to leave little comments like this under popular gym posts because it occasionally results in someone beginning or returning to training

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 73 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    I know there's probably isn't your area of expertise, but I don't know where else to ask.

    Are there any gym memberships out there that aren't completely sketchy and impossible to cancel?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    Definitely, and actually you would be surprised. A lot of places introduced no-contract memberships after covid. Lots of places went out of business too, then all that equipment went up for sale for cheap and lots of new places ended up opening.

    But the main thing to look for is small, privately owned gyms. I can really only speak to my area, but I have several. The most common arrangement is simply that you pay monthly, can cancel any time you want, but every time you sign up again there’s a sign-up fee. One other place I know simply charges an extra $10 per month for a no-commitment membership.

    Keep an eye out, again for smaller privately owned commercial gyms in general, but also for specialized gyms such as those that cater to powerlifting, olympic lifting, or strongman. Usually they are lacking in “amenities” that drive the price up, and are less likely to have predatory subscription schemes in general. The only downside is that these places can seem very intimidating at first, but the community is likely to be very welcoming

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Find a locally owned gym. Ask what their policy is on day passes, month to month, contracts, etc. The cost will be a bit higher than Planet Fitness, but they probably won't screw you, and the community tends to be way better.

    Also, if you want to get fit, I highly recommend finding a gym that is either "fun" or offers classes. Rock climbing, gymnastics/acrobatics, martial arts, etc tend to be more fun and engaging than showing up 3 days a week to do 3 sets of 8, and if your goal is to just generally get fit and healthy. For that matter, there are also often groups meeting up all over cities for free or cheap to run, cycle, walk, boat, play sports, etc. And if you're really dedicated to some kind of lifting, having a time and place to show up, where you know you will see friendly faces trying hard together is far more likely to keep you consistent. This is why crossfitters are often ripped, despite crossfit being a dumb training philosophy - it got the fundamentals right: get people to show up consistently and try hard by making a welcoming community that gathers at a regular time and place. Often powerlifting, oly lifting, kettlebell, strongman, and off-brand/crossfit-style gyms will offer regular classes where people train together for this very reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    As a sweeping generalization, this is only a problem with chain gyms.

    If you need a solid litmus test though, call them during core hours and ask for a quick tour. Nearly all indie gyms will let you pay for a day pass or similar if you’re new (though that isn’t always part of their posted rates). If they won’t let you test the waters without signing up for recurring payment, it’s not a gym worth going to.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    If you're in the US, I've used the YMCA for many years, it had a decent gym. When I had to move, I just had to talk to the receptionist on my way out of my last visit and they cancelled my subscription in a few minutes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (31 children)

    Resistance training is not bodybuilding

    Correct. Bodybuilding is a presentation sport with a variety of rulesets and judging criteria. Resistance training is a form of exercise with many proven physical and mental benefits

    Most athletic people I've seen (especially runners) often look like they have no muscle

    Usain Bolt was phenomenally muscular when he was competing, as are most sprinters. Many recognized Olympic sports reward larger physiques

    Biceps have nothing to do with longevity.

    You have my permission to skip direct bicep training.

    Just make sure, assuming you want the full spectrum of proven benefits, that you hit your pulls (such as rows and pull ups, or appropriately scaled variations). This will heavily involve your biceps just so you know, but the main focus is the back.

    In fact, extra weight is extra load on heart.

    Dangerous medical misinformation, you should delete this. Resistance training has proven cardiac benefits. There is zero risk of acquiring “too much” muscle mass

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (21 children)

    Perhaps once you understand why you are wrong, and you realize how much your error has the potential to harm people, you will apologize.

    This study is definitionally unrelated to any form of resistance training, or the additional total body mass that you can acquire via resistance training.

    It is an observational study on the outcomes of IFBB contestants. For anyone who doesn’t know, the IFBB is the primary bodybuilding federation for drug abusers. They run the “Mr. Olympia” contest which you may have heard of.

    The drug abuse they glorify directly results in many extreme health issues including sudden cardiac death, in exchange for levels of muscle gain that far exceed what is possible for any natural athlete.

    I want to be clear. What they are doing is extreme, illegal, dangerous, and critically, not related to resistance training in any meaningful way. The body will not allow you to become so muscular that it harms you, which is why these extreme athletes need illegal drugs to become so large in the first place.

    It is shockingly irresponsible and ethically wrong for you to withhold this necessary context, and to so severely contort this paper into your unrelated false conclusion

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (17 children)

    I see, so in the end, you have decided to persist in falsehood. I hope you know that through humility, it is still possible for you to be redeemed from this shame.

    Beyond that, the actual content in your latest comment here is ludicrous beyond credulity. You continue to literally lie about the contents of the study. You assert imagined facts about bodybuilding as a whole that nobody else ascribes to. You propose a ridiculous false dichotomy between aerobic and anaerobic exercise.

    It is my hope that everyone will be able to easily see through what you are doing. Here is some accessible educational material for those who may possibly be confused by your continued repetition of dangerous and misleading information:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strength_training

    Some highlights, emphasis mine:

    Strength training, also known as weight training or resistance training, is exercise designed to improve physical strength. It may involve lifting weights, bodyweight exercises (such as push-ups, pull-ups, and squats), isometrics (holding a position under tension, such as planks), and plyometrics (explosive movements like jump squats and box jumps).

    The effects of strength training include greater muscular strength, improved muscle tone and appearance, increased endurance, cardiovascular health, and enhanced bone density. These benefits contribute not only to athletic performance but also to long-term health and independence, especially as individuals age.

    Regular resistance training supports metabolic function, helps regulate body weight, and can improve mental well-being through the release of endorphins.

    Strength training also provides functional benefits. Stronger muscles improve posture, provide better support for joints, and reduce the risk of injury from everyday activities.

    Engaging in strength training has been linked to a 10-17% reduction in the risk of death from all causes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and lung cancer. Two of its primary effects-muscle growth (hypertrophy) and increased muscular strength-are both associated with improved longevity and lower mortality rates.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (15 children)

    Muscle building is a primary effect of resistance training. Bolded that for you above.

    You are not being misinterpreted. You are wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (13 children)

    Who is this biceps only person you are obsessed with?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    I don’t know why you’re still talking about it but yes. Exclusive bicep focus is not a good strategy for improving your health. Nobody ever said otherwise, not even the meme (the subject has a fully developed upper body, and the angle even shows off the whole back). Just let it go

    It’s also literally irrelevant. The reason you pissed off 100% of the community is not because you dislike bicep training, but because you posted dangerous medical misinformation, which is still in fact in your original post. You have now agreed that you were wrong about that. You should edit your post to correct your mistake

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    extra weight

    Correct, this part is where you were wrong, as you have now agreed in writing.

    Why would anyone get hurt by that?

    You are actively encouraging people to develop osteoporosis and sarcopenia. Secondarily, you are steering them away from the massive list of other proven benefits of training, such as reduced injury risk and improved mental health.

    It’s literally as insane as telling people to avoid drinking water because drinking alcohol is bad for you, and those are both things you drink. And then posting a random study about the health outcomes of alcoholics and literally lying through your teeth as you say the study is about drinking in general, whether it be water or alcohol.

    It’s shockingly disingenuous and unethical

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (4 children)

    Just to clear some more confusion - when I say extra weight, I mean any form of weight (including fats) that don't directly contribute to better wellbeing of your body, longevity and better cardiovascular function.

    What do you think I meant by extra weight?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (3 children)

    If you are so concerned about confusion, you should refrain from ever explaining or offering advice to anyone moving forward

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (2 children)

    That hasn't really happened before and people generally take my advice (probably because I look like 30 at near 40, muscular and fit). Recently also managed to get my chubby cousin to start going to the gym after I bombarded him with studies highlighting how important it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Are you implying 20% body fat is low?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    It kinda is if you're a woman. Of course there's not very much overlap between women and 6'1" 300 lb guys.

    But yeah, the problem there is the abuse of steroids and growth hormones required to get such a body. That will fuck your body up in various ways you might not even notice at first.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

    Bodybuilding is a form of resistance training. And there are multiple forms of bodybuilding, some healthy and some significantly less so. The above trainer seems to be talking about a sort of general fitness and casual bodybuilding that is indeed good for health and longevity.

    Running is great, in moderation. But having reasonable amounts of muscle mass is also great. Most people are going to have better health outcomes looking like Brad Pitt in Fight Club rather than Edward Norton

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    There is not a single evidence that muscle mass within natural limits becomes detrimental. Of course it's kinda hard to test it out as well as we would need naturals, close to their maximum limit and hold that for decades, but no point to scare anyone that it's a possibility naturally as most people will never even reach close to their maximum muscle building potential.

    Even when going to steroid abuse territory, it's questionable whatever steroids do more damage than just the muscle mass itself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    That excessive muscle mass is detrimental or that lack of cardiovascular training is detrimental?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I wouldn't bother with this person, they've got a huge bee in their bonnet about bodybuilding and muscle mass. They seem to have extrapolated the negative health effects of doing huge amounts of steroids and putting on inhuman muscle mass out to all bodybuilding period, and they refuse to have this misconception educated out of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Understandable, but that does once again go back to the point that detrimental amount of muscle mass is only achievable through the usage of steroids and at that point it's questionable which did more damage. Within natural limitations, it's not something someone should worry about.

    Though yes i do agree with you that cardiovascular training shouldn't be completely neglected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    I think the confusion/general anger/dismissal occured from me also saying that growing arm biceps hardly relate to longevity, and for me resistance training is all about longevity and health, not simply looking good. There are muscles in your body that directly relate to health of cardiovascular system, longevity, health, etc., and then there are others that scientifically don't really show signs of increased longevity or better health (directly), like arm biceps. They do, however, relate indirectly in a way that it still counts as an exercise, which is always good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    Does it have to be with the gym? Is there anything that generally being active doesn't cover?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    Joint health, bone density, and strength/muscle mass are things you will miss out on if, say, you just play ultimate frisbee. But getting stronger doesnt have to be 3 sets of 8 on bench. You can get essentially the same health benefits by engaging in sports that train strength, like martial arts, acrobatics, or rock climbing. That said, many people who do any kind of physical activity aggressively typically find that they enjoy lifting at some point in their athletic careers, as lifting itself can improve athletic performance and ward off sports injuries, due to the controlled and progressive nature of gym work, as compared to the more chaotic nature of real-world activities.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    A commercial gym is not necessary!

    So “general activity” I can only assume is stuff like going on walks and hikes, playing sports, enjoying the outdoors, and so on. This will generally fall under the umbrella of cardiovascular exercise which is extremely good, and you should do

    Resistance training is typically performed in much shorter bouts of intense activity. It’s very convenient in a gym, but you can do pretty much everything you need with the right setup (bench press is very similar to pushups, for example, which don’t require equipment.)

    The biggest challenge outside of a gym is how to progress movements. For example, once you can do 50 pushups, how could you make it harder so that the movement would be appropriately challenging, and not take all day? And then another issue sometimes can be training the muscles of the back without equipment, typically done via pull-ups and rows.

    But ultimately everything is doable! Check out the youtube channel “Hybrid Calisthenics”, he’s got a ton of excellent content aimed directly at this question. He also sells cheap gymnastics rings which handily solve the muscles-of-the-back problem, if you have somewhere to hang them from (even a tree!)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    I mean, the limitation of calisthenics isnt the back, but the legs. Not to say there arent good leg exercises, but the legs are so strong that you have to get pretty creative pretty quickly if you want to keep progressing them.

    The other thing I want to note is that a lot of people gravitate towards calisthenics because you can do it at home, and they feel uncomfortable in a gym, so they decide to try calisthenics rather than face their gym anxiety. And while this can work for some people, for most it will hamstring their progress since exercising alone at home is almost custom-designed to kill motivation and habit formation, and thus will stop people from staying consistent and getting the results they want. In addition, calisthenics progressions are often pretty big leaps, and it can be frustrating to be able to rep out 20 on one exercise, and then be shut down by the progression.

    If you think that calisthenics is cool, or you dont have the money for a gym membership or equipment, or if there are no gyms around you, then go for it! But I would suggest you do your workouts somewhere other than at home (like at a local park) and that you try your best to meet up with others with a similar interest, as these are the things that will make the habit stick.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Another vote for checking out hybrid callisthenics. They also have a website with a basic routine including instructions and links to videos explaining all of the progressions for each movement that is free to use and a great resource for people who are new and need some direction.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Its about control. Being active is great overall but could leave some weak spots or even be wearing things out. Certain muscles might not get worked quite right or to their full range of movement. Working out with good technique and variety should hit all your muscles and identify any tight or painful spots you need to work on.

    If you're after results, like increased strength, endurance, or a better physique, then thats where training comes in. You have to push to near failure to demand muscle growth. If you start biking 5 miles a day, those first few weeks and months you might grow a bit, but eventually that 5 miles won't be as challenging and you'll plateau in terms of strength and endurance. Thats where training, either training the muscles or doing more cycling, really starts to work. Thats how you grow and start improving again.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    You can do resistance exercises without the gym and get a good chunk of benefits from it. It's easier with a gym though, and in my experience more fun.

    If you just want to dip your toes in it, look into calisthenics. Should you find that enjoyable and hit a plateau in your progress, consider joining a gym at that point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    It's quite possible to do resistance training at home, and it's particularly affordable if you use resistance bands, which also take up extremely little space.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Can confirm.

    Having an progressive program tailored to one's goals is key. In the first 6 months of going to the gym I wasn't seeing a lot of results. It was certainly better than nothing; I was learning the exercises, developing the base level strength to handle beginner weight levels... But where were these newbie gains everyone was talking about?
    It wasn't until I got on a good plan that I started making noticable leaps in strength. A year in, I decided to add in some cardio (just a 2 mile run) and suddenly I started blowing up.

    When I finally got my routine optimized I could be in and out of the gym in an hour. 3 times a week, that was it. If I was tight on time, I would simply do my run on my off days.

    So daily investment of 30 to 45 minutes.

    You can buy a cheap weight bench and you won't even have to go to the gym. Hell, you can buy a cheap rack, too, like I did and do every exercise in your home for free.

    You can accidentally lose 45 minutes just zoned out on the couch flipping through channels, so time-wise, it's about the best ROI you could ever make.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You can accidentally lose 45 minutes just zoned out on the couch flipping through channels,

    This is why my home workouts end up taking longer lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    At gym: rest timer goes off, me seeing that guy eyeing my bench for the last 20 minutes, better knock out the last set.

    At home: rest timer goes off, "You're not the boss of me!"

    Also me: between set, mmm, a pb&j sounds great right about now, wanders off

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    So I guess the trick is, and has always been, consistency?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Honestly I would say consistency is somewhat overrated in the grand scheme of things

    ALERT. ALERT. OVERRATED DOES NOT MEAN BAD

    Consistency is obviously extremely good. I used to preach it. But honestly, I took on a client with severe intermittent health issues which results in them having about 50% adherence (meaning they miss, on average, about half their training sessions)

    And they ended up progressing just fine lol

    Actually I feel like a far bigger risk is for people to assume they need to have perfect consistency, then drop training altogether when they aren’t able to meet that high standard.

    The critical thing to understand is that resistance training is EXTREMELY potent for beginners. Even inconsistent effort will do pretty amazing things for your health

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    What i really meant by consistency isn't really being perfect anyway, it's more about longevity, as in, being imperfect, but over a long period of time, ideally as long as you are capable.

    I really appreciate all the info you're giving! It's really encouraging.

    I was a high level athlete growing up, so my only previous example of what was "enough" is hard to live up to as an adult working in an office, but seeing as ive been going an average of 7-8 hours per week, that makes me feel a lot more confident that I am, in fact, doing enough.

    So thank you :)

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I can't imagine 40 hours a week of endurance training being anything but detrimental to one's health. The pain of stacked up micro injuries would be unbearable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Lots of pro runners run over 100 miles a week, once you're there it's not so bad. Cyclists will do even more, bike packers get excited by the idea. As a kid I went to canoe camp and we would paddle for 40 hours a week sometime. Not sure if I should include through hiking.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    40 hours a week is quite uncommon, but elite cyclists can put in upwards of 30 hours. With that type of volume, intensity management is quite important. You need to do the large majority of your exercise at low intensity for it to yield good results.

  • source
  • parent