you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

My point is that existential threats override real concern about incremental gains in administrative power by the government. I used Denmark as a hypothetical and parallel example of a country that could centralize given the same condiitons, threats to sovereignty, not anything to do with what theyre actually doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    If this is how we're rolling over with the "existential threat" of Trump going back and forth about a 51st state, the hell is going to happen if/when an actual war breaks out?

    That's literally why the article is titled the way it is. War powers as if its wartime. But its not wartime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Trump waging economic warfare against Canada.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments