▲ 467 ▼ Thoughts?? (mander.xyz) submitted 1 year ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 80 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) Why did the contracts specify that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) A lot of government stuff requires that they have complete provenance of all code in the system. When you have people contributing to it from different places - potentially different countries - they get nervous about it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You'd think they'd also be worried about most proprietary software being a black box when it comes to their code. But it could be only a secondary concern permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago We were restricted even on some proprietary software (especially if it was from a foreign owned company), but you'd be surprised how much scrutiny some of the major packages have had. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) A lot of government stuff requires that they have complete provenance of all code in the system. When you have people contributing to it from different places - potentially different countries - they get nervous about it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You'd think they'd also be worried about most proprietary software being a black box when it comes to their code. But it could be only a secondary concern permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago We were restricted even on some proprietary software (especially if it was from a foreign owned company), but you'd be surprised how much scrutiny some of the major packages have had. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) You'd think they'd also be worried about most proprietary software being a black box when it comes to their code. But it could be only a secondary concern permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago We were restricted even on some proprietary software (especially if it was from a foreign owned company), but you'd be surprised how much scrutiny some of the major packages have had. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago We were restricted even on some proprietary software (especially if it was from a foreign owned company), but you'd be surprised how much scrutiny some of the major packages have had. permalink fedilink source parent
