I'm the opposite, lots of rapid fire photos, but I do photo a lot of animals. I don't pose them either. I like candid shots of the pets doing there thing.

I got to sit through a photos and editing class as a para last year and I learned so much about it! I really wish film was easier to get developed because I have this beautiful 60 year old agfamatic that I adore using and now I actually know how to adjust for lighting and angle, different framing techniques, and everything, but I still can't afford to develop the shots.

Ah, I am very sad to hear that, I hope you are a good bot like the T-800 in Terminator 2!

Yes, I know, that's why I used it as an overly-reductive example. I'm saying you can't just easily explain your technique. Even if you identify the leading style, a good photo is going to incorporate a number of principles and techniques. That's why my alternative was launching into a Photography 101 lesson.

When someone asks you what equipment you use, they probably fall into one of two camps:

-They're making smalltalk about your hobby, in which case again, that opens the door to a more in depth conversation if that's the vibe. "I used X camera with Y lens, which works really well with this kind of framing at these settings." You can even skip the equipment entirely and just focus on a particular effect and how you achieved it, explaining how it's more to do with lens settings and composition than a specific camera.

-They're interested in the hobby themselves, and looking for information that will inform what kind of equipment they will start using. A good photographer can make use of a disposable camera, but someone starting off needs a bit of guidance to find equipment that is good enough for serious work, but cheap enough for an entry level enthusiast.