▲ 873 ▼ FAFO .. bummer (lemmy.world) submitted 6 months ago by zedgeist@lemmy.world to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 30 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 1 point 6 months ago (4 children) why is the same person replying to their own tweet? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 6 months ago (3 children) Because it's a direct follow up to what they said, pointing out a related observation. It's like people adding an edit to their post or someone commenting on their own lemmy post. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago (2 children) this felt more like they forgot it was their own post permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 months ago* (1 child) It's a post from later, providing added input after the OP has seen how many scientists agree with the sentiment... The reason for the reply is literally written in the text that it is made up of permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 1 point 6 months ago Ah i see I misread "how many scientists are retweeting this" as "how many scientists sre tweeting this" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 6 months ago (3 children) Because it's a direct follow up to what they said, pointing out a related observation. It's like people adding an edit to their post or someone commenting on their own lemmy post. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago (2 children) this felt more like they forgot it was their own post permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 months ago* (1 child) It's a post from later, providing added input after the OP has seen how many scientists agree with the sentiment... The reason for the reply is literally written in the text that it is made up of permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 1 point 6 months ago Ah i see I misread "how many scientists are retweeting this" as "how many scientists sre tweeting this" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 0 points 6 months ago (2 children) this felt more like they forgot it was their own post permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 months ago* (1 child) It's a post from later, providing added input after the OP has seen how many scientists agree with the sentiment... The reason for the reply is literally written in the text that it is made up of permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 1 point 6 months ago Ah i see I misread "how many scientists are retweeting this" as "how many scientists sre tweeting this" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 months ago* (1 child) It's a post from later, providing added input after the OP has seen how many scientists agree with the sentiment... The reason for the reply is literally written in the text that it is made up of permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 1 point 6 months ago Ah i see I misread "how many scientists are retweeting this" as "how many scientists sre tweeting this" permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MadhuGururajan@programming.dev 1 point 6 months ago Ah i see I misread "how many scientists are retweeting this" as "how many scientists sre tweeting this" permalink fedilink source parent