About 40% of Americans have cut back on streaming services in the last three months because of financial concerns, according to a recent report

Americans are quitting subscription streaming services in droves as the cost of living continues to climb, a recent report has found.

Streaming services such as Netflix and Hulu have become increasingly popular in recent years, but Deloitte’s 2026 Digital Media Trends report, released late last month, shows how Americans are getting frustrated over the cost to have their favorite movies and TV shows at the click of a button.

“As the cost of everyday essentials like food and housing remain high, many consumers are reevaluating their budgets and cutting back on nonessential expenditures,” Deloitte said in its survey results. “At the same time, prices for media and entertainment services continue to climb.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 151 points 7 months ago (46 children)

My Jellyfin server is doing great. My only constraint is my free disk space

  • source
  • hideshow 46 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 7 months ago (31 children)

    Yea, fucking AI making it too expensive to be a data hoarder. I have to keep making hard decisions on which media to delete.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I'm kicking myself now for not buying more 20 TB hard drives when they were under $250. It's rough out there for any computer related hobbies right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    I bought two right before stuff jumped too badly. Looked about a week later thinking buying another one might be an ok idea, rofl no way I can justify it now..

    So now I'm debating if I really NEED backups.. certainly not of everything.. I still need a video card, and those never did really come back down..

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    For whatever reason I bought 10 at once and I've just been slowly feeding them to my array as I need them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    If you have the processing power to spare (and haven't done it already), you might be able to re-encode your media files to a more space-efficient codec.

    I've reduced some of my video files by as much at 75% using Handbrake to convert from AVC to H.264 or H.265. I'm not the most discerning viewer, so I haven't noticed any difference in video quality, but I've definitely noticed the extra space on my drives!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I've got an ffmpeg script saved on my Mac which re-encodes video to a fraction of its original size without any apparent loss of quality. Shit's basically magic.

    I have one for audio as well, but I think it's an Apple-only MP4 codec, that requires you to have to manually build it into ffmpeg on any other platform. But the end result is that my 2 hour radio show AIFFs that start out at 4GB end up being high quality MP4 at around 75mb.

    Like I said, magic.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Do you happen to remember where you got it? I’ve got a Mac and while the idea of going through all the media files on my servers to convert them I twitch a little bit, but would also love to cut down space without giving up some of my files

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Pretty sure it's this command;

    ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -vcodec libx265 -crf 30 -tag:v hvc1 output.mp4

    On my M2 Air, conversions are usually pretty quick, depending on the size of the input. After a short while it does throttle because there's no fan, but it counters along nicely.

    As for audio; I use XLD, set to encode HE-AAC at 80kbps. It seems really low, but still sounds great.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    In the process of shifting my entire iCloud photo library over to Immich, I've discovered that a huge amount of the videos I've shot over the years with various iPhones are ridiculously huge x264 .MOVs. So I've been fiddling about with ffmpeg this morning, and have landed upon this script that re-encodes them to around 10% of their original size with no visible loss of quality, and retains EXIF metadata. One video I have is 90 seconds long, and is of bats filmed at twilight over a large pond in the New Forest. The original is 132mb, but because most of the clip is basically black, it's been able to compress it to 2mb. Which is mad.

    Anyway.

    Navigate your terminal to a folder that contains a bunch of videos and paste this in, then sit back and let ffmpeg work its magic:

    for i in *.MOV; do ffmpeg -i "$i" -map_metadata 0 -vcodec libx265 -crf 30 -tag:v hvc1 -movflags use_metadata_tags "${i%.*}.mp4"; done
    

    For just the odd one or two videos, here's the basic ffmpeg command:

    ffmpeg -i input.mp4 -map_metadata 0 -vcodec libx265 -crf 30 -tag:v hvc1 -movflags use_metadata_tags ouput.mp4
    

    God, I love ffmpeg.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago*

    Just as a heads up, if you aren't concerned about "copyright"/"intellectual property" the better way would be to download native h.265 rips instead of re-encoding your existing h.264 files, as those will look better since you aren't compressing the already existing compression artifacts of your old files. Copy of a copy and all that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (16 children)

    Which is why it can make sense to pay for pirate shares.

    Many are around $5-8/mo, and they're libraries are bigger than my own, with the added bonus of I don't have to do any maintenance.

    $60 to $98 per year, is a better deal than paying for these HDD prices. For me at least the trade-offs are worth it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (15 children)

    Private torrent tracker groups are better and free

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    Except you're still paying for extremely inflated storage costs, on top of your Usenet fee, which is roughly the same cost as a pirate share - depending on what you're paying for i.e. block vs monthly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (2 children)

    True, but I was talking about private indexers, not shares. I guess I'm lucky that I bought a fuck ton of drives before the bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child)

    I have a good bit of storage, around 60tb usuable.

    But as those drives die, I will not replace them at these prices.

    I have used the free trials of a couple different jellyfin shares to test them out, and was really impressed.

    YMMV, but after collecting and serving my own media for around two decades, the hobby part of it isn't as important to me as the the ability to access a large media library for the lowest cost possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    Can be... not as reliable or safe

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    I've had better reliability from Usenet, personally, but YMMV. Safe though? If you use Usenet over SSL, you don't even need to download over VPN, if that's what you mean.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    How does a fella get piped into those private torrent tracker groups?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I'm even using jellyfin in the car with android auto to listen to music. Recently bought a external blu-ray drive so I can rip all my old CD's and DVD's so at least some of my data is legit :D

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    I'm doing the same but I'm looking for a good client that resumes playing music on startup. Any recommendations?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    No I haven't got that figured out quite yet, it seems to resume if I just connect to my stereo bluetooth as long as I haven't touched Jellyfin between drives but not with android auto. Just figured out how to get playlists working on AA today, kind of a work around but it looks like there is a request to fix it out there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    I had to resort to used SAS drives on my server.

    You can get them pretty cheap, but you absolutely have to run a full smart test and check the error correction log before using.

    Plus they usually come with 5 years power on time minimum, so you'd only want to run them in any RAID/ZRAID combo that has redundancy.

    Couple of people here mentioned re-encoding, but that also harms the seed count if you're using BitTorrent as the exchange medium.

    Part of the issue is that Bluray remux rips are usually in H.265 at 10 bit with Dolby Vision which pushes 4K file size into the 70-100Gb range.

    That's fine for a single movie on a bluray disk, but its atrocious for saving multiple onto a drive or NAS.

    But then most encodes still almost all use H.265 or H.264 which still gives you a fat 30Gb file for 4K.

    I'm pretty sure AV1 solves this issue because it has much better compression compared to H.265, especially for higher pixel content, but no Blurays are using AV1 because there's no reduced cost in forcing a change in consumer hardware.

    Plus I think AV1 technically doesn't support Dolby Vision in proper yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments