you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 129 points 7 months ago (84 children)

This gets posted regularly on Lemmy, and while the economic take is tone-deaf at best, there's a real issue with generating more power than you can use. You can't just dump grid power


it needs to go somewhere. The grid needs to consume as much as it generates at all times or else bad things happen.

There are of course solutions, but that doesn't mean it's not an engineering challenge to implement.

Figuring out what to do with kilowatts is easy, but figuring out what to do with megawatts, at the drop of a hat, is substantially harder.

  • source
  • hideshow 84 child comments
  • [–] 96 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    Peak energy production would be a good time to train the damn llms instead of building natural gas power plant I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Given the price of RAM and graphics cards, it is obvious that running LLM is at least somewhat limited by the amount of hardware available. So having that hardware sitting idle, except when there is too much solar power, is obviously not economically viable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    Power and grid infrastructure is a limitation that can exceed hardware availability in some regions. Musk has a datacenter with 20-something methane gas generators running throughout the day to power his mini-me sycophantic AI, Grok.

    At the cost of a cultural deficit, solar could provide an environmental benefit there during the day.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago

    You can dump megawatts. But there is no need for that. It's not like solar panel inverters will just keep increasing voltage until they can push the power into the grid. They have an upper limit.

    Basically I don't see your point

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    Maybe I don't know enough about electricity at large scale, but at small scale you can just cut the circuit. Electricity isn't like water that just sits in the pipe when you close a valve, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Can't you cut the power at each individual solar panel? I assume that the amount of electricity out there is low enough to not cause that kind of problems?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    You're pretty much describing what hybrid inverters do for home solar panels. They can disconnect and not export to the grid when you don't need it and just power your house and charge your batteries.

    But hybrid inverters are quite a bit more expensive than standard grid-tied inverters that are always pumping into the grid.

    For instance, I just had to replace my home inverter that died and I got a cheap 6 kilowatt inverter for about $1,300. A hybrid inverter would be at minimum 3 or 4k.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] [S] 27 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Solar panels need an aperture.

    Again, though, using gravity batteries or pumped hydro is a great way to manage excess juice, though these are expensive options.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago (12 children)

    Batteries? Boil water? Anything?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Use excess to boil water for steam turbines. Solved. Big oil has INSANE propaganda.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Grid scale storage is actively being worked on.

    Chemical batteries, like rechargeable lithium ion batteries, are a big part of it. Sodium ion batteries and iron air batteries are coming up, as well.

    Somewhat related are rechargeable fuel cells and flow batteries, that similarly store chemical energy that can support two-way charge/discharge cycles.

    Gravity storage, like pumping water up into a reservoir and then using it to drive turbines on the way down, or elaborate elevator shaft type systems, can store some energy but require lots of land and material, or require very specific geographic features not commonly found.

    Kinetic energy storage, turning lots of heavy flywheels and then recapturing that momentum to produce electricity when needed, is also on the grid (and kinda mimics the rotational inertia of the turbines traditionally synced across the grid).

    Some other storage technologies include capacitors, pressurized gas containers, and thermal heat storage with molten salt that can be used to make steam to drive turbines on demand.

    But all of these solutions are difficult to scale up to the point where they make a significant difference in addressing the mismatch between supply and demand at different times of day. We gotta do all of it, and right now the most cost effective solution is chemical batteries, so that's been growing at an exponential rate.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago

    The extra power issue is not that hard to solve, when you get close you can start mandating the inverters to have smart connection to the grid, so they stop providing power to the grid if demand is satisfied.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (11 children)

    You can’t just dump grid power — it needs to go somewhere. The grid needs to consume as much as it generates at all times or else bad things happen.

    we figured out this problem centuries ago it is called capacitors. long term it is called batteries

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    shit like this burns power fast if you need to clear capacity. just ground it. i'm not that smart of an engineer and this is not that hard of a problem. the hard part is the grid, the interconnectedness, the load balancing, and that's already done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    That would actually be sci-fi as fuck, and I'm now 100% for it. I want power plants to have constantly zapping Tesla coils

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    Neither of which grow on trees.

    Edit: well I guess lemons grow on trees and those are batteries if you try hard enough…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    my dude gravity is a battery if you know how to use it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    The problem we have to solve is that the energy storage that's built into the grid was built before widespread home solar adoption. We need new energy dumps, and those cost money. Of course the obvious answer is taxes, but good luck convincing Americans to pay for vital infrastructure

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    No. No no no. You can literally turn solar generation off, nearly instantly. It's called curtailment and it's done all the time in saturated markets. Older residential inverters don't have the reactive technology, but residential solar is a drop in the bucket compared to utility-scale solar.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Figuring out what to do with kilowatts is easy

    So what you're saying is that if it's distributed enough (say, on the roofs of houses, sized to serve the needs of the occupants) it's not a problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    But if I’m not home, my AC is off, fridge isn’t running at that moment, all of that power gets dumped onto the grid.

    And if it couldn't do that, your solar panels would warm up a little bit and nothing else of consequence would happen. Ditto for your neighbors' solar panels, and everybody else's. Whoop-de-do.

    It wouldn't even cause a net increase in the urban heat island effect, because if that energy weren't hitting solar panels it would just be heating up people's roofs instead.

    Sure, the energy company pays a pittance for the energy I put onto the grid, but it’s still payment. I’m not gonna put a dummy load on my house to not export power

    You're conflating an technological problem with an economic one. The only reason you claim my proposal wouldn't work is because you don't want it to because it cuts into your profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (13 children)

    a giant flywheel for every town!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 7 months ago (12 children)

    Pumped Hydro is a pretty safe storage method using preexisting technology if you have hills in the area.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PH0IJ-_qOI

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    i don't want safe, i want DANGER!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Store it as compared air in steel tanks buried underneath your home. No protective coating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    Like any hydroelectrics it has large environment impact and dam failures tend to be the deadliest industrial disasters when they happen. Also most good locations have already been used. You cannot just build it wherever (without insane costs). Pumped hydro is hardly a solution here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    Pumped hydro isn't the same as a hydroelectric dam. Because both reservoirs are engineered and you don't have the concrete wall as the single point of failure, you don't have the same risks involved. Pump Hydro can be whatever size you want and spread out to distribute the grid load.

    Also, are dam failures worse then Climate Change or are they just more dramatic?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    Solar panels don't care if the energy they could produce isn't consumed.

    Wind generators can be feathered and breaked until they stop rotating and generating.

    Hydro-generation dams can simply close their water intakes and stop generating.

    The things that have problems stopping generation are not renewables, they're things like nuclear power plants.

    Negative energy prices are not a technical problem - if the decision to do so is made, renewable generation systems can quickly stop producing.

    Negative energy prices are due to Market systems being used to decide who stops generating if supply exceeds demand - instead of some centralized entity deciding who will stop, the individual suppliers look at the market price for their product and decide themselves to stop/start producing or not.

    Because electric power supply/demand balance changes way faster than said market signals are produced and processed ultimatelly to decisions to stop or start generation, you end up with prices overshooting and undershooting the ideal price point which is in equilibrium with the supply/demand balance, and sometimes the undershooting results in negative prices.

    So negative energy prices are the result of the political choice of using market systems rather than some kind of centralized control - a system with centralized control would respond far faster to falls in demand and would thus not generate more power than demand to the point that somebody is actually paid to consume power.

    So yeah, the idea that it's solar panels that are the problem by causing negative energy prices is complete total bullshit - the choice of a market system to regulate supply and demand is the source of the problem and solar, because it has very low operational costs and thus the price solar operators are willing to sell their product for is lower, just means that when the market at times naturally undershots (because it's SLOW at responding to changes in supply/demand) it will do so against an equilibrium price which is lower because solar is cheaper, and will thus more frequently end up going below zero price and into negative territory before bouncing back and stabilizing at the price which is in equilibrium with the current supply/demand balance.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    It doesn't even have to be stored in a way that can be turned back into electricity. Electrical heaters are damn near 100% efficient except for transmission losses, and there are tons of industrial processes that can store and use that heat.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (6 replies)