you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 32 points 10 months ago (8 children)

They should maybe have done that when it became clear the site was run by a Nazi, but better late then never.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

    Nazis be nazis

    Prudes be prudes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Prudes be prudes

    I don't see this as an issue of prudes vs. non prudes, it's a form of sexual assault.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    I think they're just pointing out that politicians were okay with staying on Twitter after it became a nazi website, but the "grok porn" is the final nail in the coffin for them, it suggests that they consider sexual content to be worse than nazi content.

    Obviously having an AI generate porn of real people should be a crime, and probably already is, but the law is optional for corporations and billionaires.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    yeah, that's valid, I can't come up with any reason to separate the degrees of deplorableness of X - the nazi shit was repugnant enough for any outfit to leave - see NPR etc. and there's no value add to it - it's a cesspool and there's so little to be gained, it's inexcusable to use it at this point, much less rely on it.

    now that they're making porn out of whatever the chuds want to prompt what the fuck over, like, learn to leave something behind

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments