I dunno (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 10 months ago (18 children)

b*c is the product of b and c.

Show me one textbook where a(b+c)^2^ gets an a^2^ term. Here's four in a row that say you're full of shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (17 children)

    b*c is the product of b and c

    Nope! bc is the product of b and c - it's right there in the textbook! 😂

    that say you’re full of shit.

    Says person yet again who has proven they are full of shit about the definition of Terms 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (16 children)

    The result of a multiplication operation is called a product.

    Show me one textbook where a(b+c)^2^ gets an a^2^ term. Here's four in a row that say you're full of shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (15 children)

    The result of a multiplication operation is called a product

    Now you're getting it - axb=ab. axb is Multiplication of 2 Terms, ab is the single Product. It's the reason that 8/2(1+3) and 8/2x(1+3) give different answers 🙄

    Show me one textbook where a(b+c)2 gets an a2 term

    I already gave you many that tell you a(b+c)=(ab+ac) Mr. Ostrich - which part of a(b+c)=(ab+ac) are you having trouble understanding?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (14 children)

    Multiplying two things makes them one term.

    "When a product involves a variable, it is customary to omit the symbol X of multiplication. Thus, 3 X n is written 3n and means three times n, and a X b is written ab and means a times b." Modern Algebra: Structure And Method, page 36. Immediately before the definition you're now lying about.

    Fuck your non-sequitur. a(b+c)^2^ is a*(b+c)^2^, as backed up by - for example - these four math textbooks. No textbook will ever say it produces an a^2^ term. You made it up. You're just full of shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (13 children)

    Multiplying two things makes them one term

    You so nearly had it, look "two things"! Yes axb is 2 Terms being Multiplied to make them one 😂

    Immediately before the definition you’re now lying about

    Nope! Says exactly what I already said, and I have no idea why you think it says otherwise. Now read the next page, which tells you ab is one Term and doesn't say that axb is 1 Term. 🙄 You're proven wrong by the very textbook you're quoting from! 😂

    Fuck your non-sequitur

    Says person trying to disprove a(b+c)=(ab+ac) by dragging a(bc)²=ab²c² to try and make a false equivalence argument 😂

    a(b+c)2 is a*(b+c)2

    No it isn't! 😂 The first is one term, the second is two terms

    for example - these four math textbooks.

    Says Mr. Ostrich, still ignoring the dozens of textbooks I posted saying a(b+c)=(ab+ac)

    No textbook will ever say it produces an a2 term

    No, it produces an ab term and an ac term, a(b+c)=(ab+ac) 🙄

    You made it up. You’re just full of shit

    Says Mr. Ostrich, now completely full of shit, still ignoring the dozens of textbooks I posted, including ones written before I was even born

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (12 children)

    Yes... to make them one.

    a*b and ab are both the product of a and b, and a product is one term. As explained by the textbook you chose.

    a*b^2^ is ab^2^, even if b=(x+y). No textbook you're grasping for contains your made-up exception. They all show what I'm rubbing your nose in. You're just full of shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    a*b and ab are both the product of a and b,

    Nope. Only ab is the product of a and b. axb is Multiplication of 2 terms

    As explained by the textbook you chose

    If you had read more than 2 sentences of it, you would discover that you cannot use axb to show the product, only ab 🙄

    a*b2 is ab2

    No it isn't 😂 1/axb²=b²/a. 1/ab²=1/ab². Welcome to why we teach students about Terms 🙄

    No textbook you’re grasping for contains your made-up exception

    Law is the word you're looking for, and I posted dozens of them here in this post which you keep ignoring Mr. Ostrich

    They all show what I’m rubbing your nose in. You’re just full of shit.

    Nope, they all show you are full of shit Mr. Ostrich. See previous link

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (9 children)

    "a X b is written ab and means a times b."

    Rub rub rub.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    “a X b is written ab and means a times b.”

    Notice that it doesn't say equals, speaking of Illiterate fraud, as per your other comment 🙄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (7 children)

    They're more than equal - ab means a*b. It's an identity, which you'd understand, if you weren't lying about being a teacher.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    They’re more than equal

    They're not equal at all 🙄

    If a=2, b=3...

    1/ab=1/(2x3)=1/6

    1/axb=1/2x3=3/2=1.5

    It’s an identity, which you’d understand

    Nope! axb==ab is an identity, which is NOT how it's written, "illiterate fraud" as per your other comment

    if you weren’t lying about being a teacher

    says person who is lying about what the textbook says 🙄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Convention saying 1/a(b+c)^2^ is 1/(a(b+c)^2^) instead of (1/a)(b+c)^2^ doesn't change how only (b+c) is squared.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Convention saying 1/a(b+c)2 is 1/(a(b+c)2)

    There's no such convention, given it would violate The Distributive Law 🙄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    You can't keep your own horseshit straight.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    You can’t keep your own horseshit straight

    No idea what you're talking about, again, I've been saying the same thing the whole time

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments