▲ 716 ▼ I dunno (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone) submitted 11 months ago by LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to c/science_memes@mander.xyz locked 705 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 point 10 months ago (9 children) "a X b is written ab and means a times b." Rub rub rub. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (8 children) “a X b is written ab and means a times b.” Notice that it doesn't say equals, speaking of Illiterate fraud, as per your other comment 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 point 10 months ago* (7 children) They're more than equal - ab means a*b. It's an identity, which you'd understand, if you weren't lying about being a teacher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (6 children) They’re more than equal They're not equal at all 🙄 If a=2, b=3... 1/ab=1/(2x3)=1/6 1/axb=1/2x3=3/2=1.5 It’s an identity, which you’d understand Nope! axb==ab is an identity, which is NOT how it's written, "illiterate fraud" as per your other comment if you weren’t lying about being a teacher says person who is lying about what the textbook says 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (5 children) Convention saying 1/a(b+c)^2^ is 1/(a(b+c)^2^) instead of (1/a)(b+c)^2^ doesn't change how only (b+c) is squared. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (4 children) Convention saying 1/a(b+c)2 is 1/(a(b+c)2) There's no such convention, given it would violate The Distributive Law 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (3 children) You can't keep your own horseshit straight. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (2 children) You can’t keep your own horseshit straight No idea what you're talking about, again, I've been saying the same thing the whole time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 child) You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago. Troll. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago Yet again, I have no idea what you're talking about Troll says person who can't back up anything they say about Terms with textbook references 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev -1 points 10 months ago (8 children) “a X b is written ab and means a times b.” Notice that it doesn't say equals, speaking of Illiterate fraud, as per your other comment 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 point 10 months ago* (7 children) They're more than equal - ab means a*b. It's an identity, which you'd understand, if you weren't lying about being a teacher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (6 children) They’re more than equal They're not equal at all 🙄 If a=2, b=3... 1/ab=1/(2x3)=1/6 1/axb=1/2x3=3/2=1.5 It’s an identity, which you’d understand Nope! axb==ab is an identity, which is NOT how it's written, "illiterate fraud" as per your other comment if you weren’t lying about being a teacher says person who is lying about what the textbook says 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (5 children) Convention saying 1/a(b+c)^2^ is 1/(a(b+c)^2^) instead of (1/a)(b+c)^2^ doesn't change how only (b+c) is squared. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (4 children) Convention saying 1/a(b+c)2 is 1/(a(b+c)2) There's no such convention, given it would violate The Distributive Law 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (3 children) You can't keep your own horseshit straight. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (2 children) You can’t keep your own horseshit straight No idea what you're talking about, again, I've been saying the same thing the whole time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 child) You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago. Troll. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago Yet again, I have no idea what you're talking about Troll says person who can't back up anything they say about Terms with textbook references 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 point 10 months ago* (7 children) They're more than equal - ab means a*b. It's an identity, which you'd understand, if you weren't lying about being a teacher. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (6 children) They’re more than equal They're not equal at all 🙄 If a=2, b=3... 1/ab=1/(2x3)=1/6 1/axb=1/2x3=3/2=1.5 It’s an identity, which you’d understand Nope! axb==ab is an identity, which is NOT how it's written, "illiterate fraud" as per your other comment if you weren’t lying about being a teacher says person who is lying about what the textbook says 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (5 children) Convention saying 1/a(b+c)^2^ is 1/(a(b+c)^2^) instead of (1/a)(b+c)^2^ doesn't change how only (b+c) is squared. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (4 children) Convention saying 1/a(b+c)2 is 1/(a(b+c)2) There's no such convention, given it would violate The Distributive Law 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (3 children) You can't keep your own horseshit straight. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (2 children) You can’t keep your own horseshit straight No idea what you're talking about, again, I've been saying the same thing the whole time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 child) You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago. Troll. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago Yet again, I have no idea what you're talking about Troll says person who can't back up anything they say about Terms with textbook references 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (6 children) They’re more than equal They're not equal at all 🙄 If a=2, b=3... 1/ab=1/(2x3)=1/6 1/axb=1/2x3=3/2=1.5 It’s an identity, which you’d understand Nope! axb==ab is an identity, which is NOT how it's written, "illiterate fraud" as per your other comment if you weren’t lying about being a teacher says person who is lying about what the textbook says 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (5 children) Convention saying 1/a(b+c)^2^ is 1/(a(b+c)^2^) instead of (1/a)(b+c)^2^ doesn't change how only (b+c) is squared. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (4 children) Convention saying 1/a(b+c)2 is 1/(a(b+c)2) There's no such convention, given it would violate The Distributive Law 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (3 children) You can't keep your own horseshit straight. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (2 children) You can’t keep your own horseshit straight No idea what you're talking about, again, I've been saying the same thing the whole time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 child) You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago. Troll. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago Yet again, I have no idea what you're talking about Troll says person who can't back up anything they say about Terms with textbook references 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (5 children) Convention saying 1/a(b+c)^2^ is 1/(a(b+c)^2^) instead of (1/a)(b+c)^2^ doesn't change how only (b+c) is squared. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (4 children) Convention saying 1/a(b+c)2 is 1/(a(b+c)2) There's no such convention, given it would violate The Distributive Law 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (3 children) You can't keep your own horseshit straight. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (2 children) You can’t keep your own horseshit straight No idea what you're talking about, again, I've been saying the same thing the whole time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 child) You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago. Troll. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago Yet again, I have no idea what you're talking about Troll says person who can't back up anything they say about Terms with textbook references 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (4 children) Convention saying 1/a(b+c)2 is 1/(a(b+c)2) There's no such convention, given it would violate The Distributive Law 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (3 children) You can't keep your own horseshit straight. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (2 children) You can’t keep your own horseshit straight No idea what you're talking about, again, I've been saying the same thing the whole time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 child) You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago. Troll. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago Yet again, I have no idea what you're talking about Troll says person who can't back up anything they say about Terms with textbook references 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (3 children) You can't keep your own horseshit straight. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (2 children) You can’t keep your own horseshit straight No idea what you're talking about, again, I've been saying the same thing the whole time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 child) You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago. Troll. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago Yet again, I have no idea what you're talking about Troll says person who can't back up anything they say about Terms with textbook references 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago (2 children) You can’t keep your own horseshit straight No idea what you're talking about, again, I've been saying the same thing the whole time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 child) You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago. Troll. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago Yet again, I have no idea what you're talking about Troll says person who can't back up anything they say about Terms with textbook references 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 child) You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago. Troll. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago Yet again, I have no idea what you're talking about Troll says person who can't back up anything they say about Terms with textbook references 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SmartmanApps@programming.dev 0 points 10 months ago You sneered about 1/ab five minutes ago Yet again, I have no idea what you're talking about Troll says person who can't back up anything they say about Terms with textbook references 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent